oo thats interesting to see who in the US elections you are close to:
(https://legacy.gamingw.net/etc/www.politicalcompass.org/images/usprimaries_2008.png)
everyone's in the green square, eh?That's a good way to lose the election
looks like you US guys need to vote Nader
As far as school attendence and seatbelts and shit are concerned, however, if you don't want to comply thats your fucking problem man, I'm not cool with humankind being above natural selection as we currently are kinda teetering on the edge of as it is. Granted I'm not saying that human evolution is slowing or stagnating, actually the research shows human evolution increasing in rate (duh higher population -> more mutations -> faster evolution. a child could figure this out). But the things that we are going to great lengths to make sure the weak, the stupid and the ill survive, when they really shouldn't just infuriate me. So I guess that I am kind of a ruthless bastard, but hey, if you aren't going to help yourself, why should I help you?
ahahahahahha. please don't tell me you advocate eugenics toono thats just stupid
So yeah, I guess I see how my feelings on other things (those were just two simple examples) fit into that ideology, but the fact of the matter is I operate on a 'HEY! What is going to make the lives of people everywhere better than worse?' basis. As far as school attendence and seatbelts and shit are concerned, however, if you don't want to comply thats your fucking problem man, I'm not cool with humankind being above natural selection as we currently are kinda teetering on the edge of as it is. Granted I'm not saying that human evolution is slowing or stagnating, actually the research shows human evolution increasing in rate (duh higher population -> more mutations -> faster evolution. a child could figure this out). But the things that we are going to great lengths to make sure the weak, the stupid and the ill survive, when they really shouldn't just infuriate me. So I guess that I am kind of a ruthless bastard, but hey, if you aren't going to help yourself, why should I help you?
no thats just stupid
I just think that if people arent willing to better themselves then why waste time trying to force them? if they dont get it then they dont get it*. too bad. if they died it would be better for the rest of us. in today's world, one less mouth to feed isn't hurting anything honestly (other than that human life obviously, but it probably wasnt worth much anyway and the energy that would have been expended on their behalf is better put to use doing something more productive)
*I can forsee an argument about maturity, but honestly thats a trait that should be selected for and for whatever reason to our detriment as a species we have transcended this
I just think that if people arent willing to better themselves then why waste time trying to force them?
hey i don't want to let you get away with this. this is utterly stupid and terrible.
first off, your argument is stupid. you say that we should not go to lengths to help the "weak" survive because it's no use, and you try to justify this by suggesting that if someone is "weaker" than someone else, then it's their fault?
you have to decide whether superiority is determined at birth or if it is something you can change by force of will or action. if you think it's the latter, then you don't believe in darwinism and your natural selection argument is ridiculous. if you think it's determined at birth and you are advocating leaving people who have done nothing other than been born a certain way to either fend for themselves or heck just kill them outright, then you're a total shithead.
then there's how you don't think we should try to help the ill survive. close down hospitals? forget about curing cancer, the tough ones will ride it out then we'll be stronger for it. the human race will be stronger.
you sound like a 12 year old black metal fan.
A weird thought just came into my head.. I thought this was a gaming forum sooo.. why are we discussing politics?Actually, this is a general forum on a gaming forum. Discussing gaming goes to the gaming forums of this gaming forum.
I think he's middleclass or something, which does explain everything.He has a damn good kitchen and cars to be middleclass imo
(http://www.politicalcompass.org/facebook/pcgraphpng.php?ec=-4.75&soc=-6.00)This is me, too.
(http://gamingw.net/pubaccess/32030/politics.jpg)
i got right there, which is weird because GW thinks i am so different politically???
(http://www.politicalcompass.org/facebook/pcgraphpng.php?ec=5.75&soc=8.56)this is funny because when I retook the test to try and get as high up in the upper right hand corner as possible, for every question I basically asked myself "if I was a rich, corporate-loving, racist, sexist, God-hates-fags-supporting, morally selfish, xenophobic piece of shit, how would I answer this question????"
this is funny because when I retook the test to try and get as high up in the upper right hand corner as possible, for every question I basically asked myself "if I was a rich, corporate-loving, racist, sexist, God-hates-fags-supporting, morally selfish, xenophobic piece of shit, how would I answer this question????"I tried to do the same thing. This graph doesn't actually reflect my views :p
and i pretty much got your score.
i don't know you, and I'm not trying to make any connections. this is all just a very weird coincidence :fogetgasp:
I tried to do the same thing. This graph doesn't actually reflect my views :pHaha that's good. Looks like Marmot, UPRC, and XxSylverxX did the same. At least I HOPE they did :fogetshifty:
this test seems really fucking dumb to me(http://gamingw.net/pubaccess/38866/crybaby.jpg)
the phrasing on most questions seems pretty biased and the whole test just seems kind of like a spitshined FIND YOUR CRUSH test or whatever. maybe that is just a failing of internet quizzes rather than just this one though!
what
he's completely right, you're a stupid guy.Are you trying to be funny? Either way I think you might be overreacting a bit!
go to hell!!!
See, I totally exploited the test, Pidgeotto221.I tried to do the same thing. This graph doesn't actually reflect my views :p(http://www.politicalcompass.org/facebook/pcgraphpng.php?ec=5.75&soc=8.56)this is funny because when I retook the test to try and get as high up in the upper right hand corner as possible, for every question I basically asked myself "if I was a rich, corporate-loving, racist, sexist, God-hates-fags-supporting, morally selfish, xenophobic piece of shit, how would I answer this question????"
and i pretty much got your score.
i don't know you, and I'm not trying to make any connections. this is all just a very weird coincidence :fogetgasp:
death penalty for serial murdering scum imoI would only support this for serial murdering scum in the level of: a) High corporate manipulative scumbags that control b) Far right authoritarian governments that support c) Religious extremist factions.
also wouldnt being raised by a homosexual couple be similar to being raised by a single parent?no
also wouldn't it mean you don't really have the opportunity to properly discover for yourself which gender you associate yourself with as you are being raised by people who don't really know alot about one of the other sexes? I don't really know alot about this stuff and I haven't read anything about it sooo feel free to educate me!If that was the case, how do you explain all the gay people that were brought up by heterosexual parents? /me thinks outside the box
also wash cycle what happens if you have a car accident and become mentally brain damaged or you get put in a wheel chair?:gwa:
Can we make sure you get put down for your wrong doing? This fuck the sick/weak/old regime you advocate was exactly how hitler started out :fogetbackflip: :fogetbackflip:
Bugger me, the test is stupid and isn't really supposed to tell you anything about where you actually stand politically, but you are a cunt for being such a weehead about it.
no
Why would it not be similar to being raised by a single parent? How would a homosexual male educate a young boy about females when he has had no experience with them whatsoever?Like I said, there are homosexual people who were raised by heterosexual couples.
How would a gay couple know how to raise a young girl for example?
Like I said I'm pretty ignorant to this stuff and I would like to be "educated".
But according to a topic made not so long ago the homosexual person is born with a different "brain" than the heterosexual.Your brain is not wired the same way when you are an infant and when you are a fully developed adult. That topic showed differences between fully developed adult brains.
What if the person is heterosexual and is given to a homosexual couple? Isn't that a bad environment to be brought up in?
Why would it not be similar to being raised by a single parent?
But according to a topic made not so long ago the homosexual person is born with a different "brain" than the heterosexual.No, it was found out that homosexuals have different brains than heterosexuals. It did not prove that they were born with different brains.
What if the person is heterosexual and is given to a homosexual couple? Isn't that a bad environment to be brought up in?There is no correlation whatsoever. Children that are raised by a homosexual couple don't have a higher chance of turning out homosexual themselves. This is a myth propagated by those against homosexual marriage, and it's long been dispelled by real-world experience from countries that have legalized adoption by homosexual partners.
(http://g.photos.cx/aaaaa-a5.png)Holyshit, how are you that left and that authoritarian at the same time? This test is bonkers!
whoah
Nah, left and authoritarian at the same time works, its pretty much communism....?Oh, what about right and libertarian? How can that work?
Oh, what about right and libertarian? How can that work?That's the american dream *_*
That's the american dream *_*What makes right libertarians and right authoritarians differ, then?
Love money, hate gays.
Stand for STRONG CHRISTIAN MORALS and PRIVATE ROADS to get your dollar from your god-given land!
What makes right libertarians and right authoritarians differ, then?Right libertarians are typically not religious and don't believe in socially conservative values like NO GAYS.
Holyshit, how are you that left and that authoritarian at the same time? This test is bonkers!