yes we have, I thought? we set up what we believe to be pre-lifes earths conditions in a little box or something and simple virus-like life forms formed within it, didnt that happen?
am i crazy?
Doubt it.
According to scientists , it would take millions of years for that to happen.
Fantastic that you would know about these sort of things, eh? Too bad that everything you just said is half-assed and speculative, and you are a dumb dumb dumb creationist douchebag.
I present the facts that are backed up by science.
Anything that is "Maybe" is not fact
Yes you did!
The picture probably came from Kent Hovind's site , but I found it on google.
Away your hands from your eyes and/or ears and stop shouting LALALALALALA whenever a scientist gives you sufficient evidence/somebody else points you to said evidence!
EVIDENCE , EXACTLY! Not proof.
Evidence - a few bones on the ground, a trail of bread crumbs, biased speculation , easy to doubt , etc.
Proof - Real , Fact , OMG it's in front of me , unbiased conclusion , etc.
What evidence is their for animals being evolved from a common ancestor , following lifeless matter?
NONE!
Life has never been recreated in a laboratory.
No one has ever replicated a model of a transitional form , without it being an animal with a disease , a deformed animal , a recreation of an animal from only a few bones like a jaw or a tooth , an animal that was created with plaster , or a "Put together" like bird bones and reptile bones.
In fact , you can't even say that radiometric dating or c14 dating is accurate , because it has been proven that these methods of dating could lead to false info.
I don't remember how c14 works , but I think it works by measuring the amount of carbon 14 in a bone and telling whether or not the bone is old , based on the amount of c14 in the bone.
Measuring the radiation in a fossil is not 100% , because there could have been massive radiation super disasters , which caused large biodiversity , thus allowing animals to evolve over a very short time.
Even understanding geographic column is not going to make it any more true , because there have been a number of things underneath dinosaur fossils .
This is a fact , go look it up.
People find stone aged items underneath dinosaur fossils all the time.
So let me get this straight, you are willing to accept the theory of evolution ONLY if thousands of chimpanzees get tortured just because someone doesn't understand what common ancestor means? Here's an analogy that might help you grasp the concept: We did not evolve from chimps, rather, chimps and humans have a COMMON ANCESTOR. That common ancestor went down many paths, two of which, that still survive today, is the human branch and the chimp branch. So think of it as such, if instead of a large scale of millions of years we were talking about just three generations of births in a human family, let's say that I am Human Stevenson and you are Chimp Stevenson, we have the same grandpa, but that doesn't mean that I am descended from you or the other way round. This is a stupid analogy and I feel like I must be stupid in order to get what you don't understand about the theory.
What are you talking about?
I didn't say we evolved from "Chimps" or I didn't say that you believed that.
Why are we talking about chimps?
I like it when people tell me what I'm thinking of. I didn't mention abiogenesis at all, yet you seem to try to explain it to me EVEN GOING AS FAR TO EXPLAIN THE WORD TO ME (hint: I am greek, I know what abiogenesis means). Once again, you are a moron who doesn't know what he's talking about.
Well you said that abiogenesis is a process.
Is genesis a process?
Yes, although the earth being supported by nothing points to it being flat
So you believe the Earth is flat? You just said it yourself.
Bullshit. You don't know what you are talking about. Ape skeleton? What species of ape? Hell, hylobates(gibbons) have a skeleton that looks WAY too similar to our own yet they are our least closely related of the four major ape genera. A chimpanzee skeleton, a gorilla skeleton, these could be great search terms but no, you just want to go with "ape" because you don't believe in the taxonomy of species and categorize them by how hairy their pubes are and how snotty their noses are.
I do believe in the taxonomy of species .
According to genesis , each day is an addition to the previous day.
In the first day , Earth and Heavens were created.
Second day , light and some other physics were created.
On the fifth day , Birds and fish were created.
On the sixth day , an addition to the birds and the fish were created , those who could walk on land.
I believe all animals on Earth share similarities with the birds and the fish , because each day in genesis is an addition to the previous.
Just because we share traits with other animals , doesn't mean that we share a common ancestor.
An alien could have made us from their genes , yet given us genes that were identical to Earth animals.
There are many theories .
You claim to not know Kent Hovind but you seem to be posting the exact same inane bullshit he has been praising up until he got jailed.
Kent Hovind had a 2 year old pocket puggle named "Anabelle" that died of a bad skin disease?
What does cosmology have to do with evolution? Why do you always do that? Why are you so stupid? We don't know where the bloody universe came about, the scientists are trying to figure it out, but oh well, might as well believe it just popped into existance because somebody wished it to be so, right? Fuck you.
Whats with all the hostility?
What does cosmology have to do with evolution , you say?
Nothing.
Abiogenesis has everything to do with cosmology , because people think cosmology proves abiogenesis , when cosmology can't even find out where the universe came from.
Where did the universe come from?
Did it come from nothing ?(Contradicts physics)
Did an infinite amount of energy expand into a universe randomly , when it is scientifically proven that nothing is random?
You lack understanding in the concept of language. Might aswell have written this post in leetspeak using numbers and random russian symbols because that'd make it easier for you too.
You are the one who writes a series without using commas like retards and dumbtards and fools and special people and weirdos do.
Screw you.
I would say the same , but I prefer not to insult people with hideous words.