Short Version:anime is kind of lame watch
this instead
Long Version:Let's face it. 99.98% of the fans of anime do not realize that artistically, it has pretty much nothing to offer. Sure, you have the Miyazaki films and the stylistically mature things like Bebop or Big O, but the vast majority of modern animes contains (1) shitty j-pop music, (2) shitty animation, (3) shitty characters, (4) shitty stories and (5) a shitload of unnecessary episodes.
But let's take our minds off of this anime, for a moment, and look at other forms of animation. In the western world, animation is very, very different--or at least, it was. I won't go in depth on the history of animation, but I'll tell you what I've gleaned from my experience and Wikipedia: the modern era of animation in the west is seeing a significant rise in computer animation, while traditional animation is declining rapidly.
That's not to say traditional animation (which means pencil and paper, for those who know little in the ways of animation (stupid) ) is completely dead. In fact, Disney is currently producing a
new, traditionally animated feature film that is due out in 2009. And if there's anything I respect about anime, it's that anime is pretty much one of the few things in the world that use a significant amount of traditional animation, though its quality is on par with cheaply produced Saturday morning cartoons.
There are tons of things to hate about Disney, though, and I'm not up for talking about that. Instead, the main focus of this topic, which has been skewed in the introduction, is on a traditionally animated, incomplete masterpiece by Richard Williams:
The Thief and the Cobbler.
These next few facts are taken directly from Wikipedia:
"The Thief and the Cobbler (released as The Princess and The Cobbler in Australia and South Africa, and Arabian Knight in most other countries) was the
twenty-six-year animated feature film pet project of Canadian animator Richard Williams. Beginning the work in 1964,
Williams intended for the film to be his masterpiece, and a milestone in the art of animation. The Thief and the Cobbler was in and out of production for over two decades, until Williams, buoyed by his success as animation director on Who Framed Roger Rabbit, signed a deal in 1990 to have Warner Bros. finance and distribute the film. This deal fell through when Williams was unable to complete the film on time. As Warners pulled out, The Completion Bond Company assumed control of the project and had it finished by producer Fred Calvert without Williams."
So what do we know about Fred Calvert's lovely rendition of
The Thief and the Cobbler? Again, from Wikipedia (hmm what a handy website):
"Calvert made several significant changes to the film. Much of Williams's finished footage was deleted from the final release print to make way for newly created scenes and song sequences. Steve Lively was brought in to record a voice and narration for the previously mute character of Tack and several other characters that already had vocal tracks prepared for them were re-voiced. The new scenes were produced on a very low budget, with the animation being produced over a short period of two months by freelance animators in Los Angeles (some from Kroyer Films, who is also credited), former Williams animators at Premier Films in London, and Don Bluth animators working under Gary Goldman in Ireland. The ink and paint work was subcontracted to Wang Film Production in Taiwan, who themselves outsourced most of the work to their satellite studio in Thailand; additional ink and paint work was done at Varga Studios in Hungary.
The end results have been compared to Saturday morning cartoons from Korea, and it is obvious that
little regard was given to matching the painstaking quality of Williams's original scenes; the primary concern was to complete the film in as little time and for as little money as possible."
Provided you're still following this story,
The Thief and the Cobbler then gets published twice: once in 1993 as
The Princess and the Cobbler and again in 1995 by Miramax as
Arabian Knight. Much of Williams's original artwork is gone; originally, Williams kept this material in his vault. When the film was taken away, this material was sent to artists in Thailand and presumably discarded by the artists there.
The story doesn't end there, however.
The Thief and the Cobbler has a loyal fanbase, perhaps more loyal a fanbase than any anime has ever had. Using sources from
The Princess and the Cobbler and bootlegged workprints, and help from some of the original animators of the film, fans have produced unofficial restorations of
The Thief and the Cobbler. Other plans for restoration have been made by professionals, more notably by Roy E. Disney in the mid 1990s. The only restoration that has any content in it, however, is the fan-restored version.
I won't say much on the plot, other than that it involves a thief, a cobbler, a princess, and has a strong influence from Near Eastern folklore.
The fan made cut of
The Thief and the Cobbler is available online and can be watched
here. It's still unfinished--a couple spots here and there have no content and are portrayed by stills. Any person who has some respect for the craft of animation is really obligated to watch this. Richard Williams is a brilliant animator, as seen in his work and his rather well-written Animator's Survival Kit. The film is also animated by some of the most highly regarded animators, Ken Harris being one of them. Though I may be generalizing just a bit, most people here don't know any of these people. Well, you fucking should. Read some Wikipedia articles or something. I reccomend reading the ASK if you're into the craft of animation or are an animator yourself. Williams was the animation director for
Who Framed Roger Rabbit?, which I'm sure many of you have actually seen.
For those of you who actually watch (or have seen) this, I'd like to read your opinions on the film. At first glance, a couple people may immediately get the idea that it stole from
Aladdin, but if you read closely in your Wikipedia articles, you'll notice that it pretty much came before Disney's
Aladdin was even thought up.
The Thief and the Cobbler vastly different, regardless--in terms of style, transitions, story, characters, and pretty much everything. It's the last film that has Vincent Price voice in it. Oh yeah, and Sean Connery voices the main character.
yeah i'm referencing and quoting wikipedia articles but hey it's easier for me i have to write less.
edit: i added a shorter version of this post because the long version is fucking long