3d visuals make a film a videogame?
Hell no. I didn't say that at all.
Giving something 3d visuals and equating it as the same thing as 'innovative' or 'creative' is what the videogame industry has boiled down to. And this film is proof that this backwards paradigm is slowly being shifted to the film industry even as we speak.
Saying the film industry has become the same thing as the videogame industry is quite different from calling a film a videogame, so I retract the last statement I made as a gross over-simplification of the matter.
James Cameron's Avatar is not, I repeat,
is not a videogame. (despite how much I would like to believe that to be true)