That's pretty good but I preferred
David Brooks' New York Times column on the subject, where he boldy states that charity work isn't enough and that it's necessary to take a harsh look at the deeper, underlying causes of poverty in Haiti such as, uh, voodoo.
As Lawrence E. Harrison explained in his book “The Central Liberal Truth,” Haiti, like most of the world’s poorest nations, suffers from a complex web of progress-resistant cultural influences. There is the influence of the voodoo religion, which spreads the message that life is capricious and planning futile. There are high levels of social mistrust. Responsibility is often not internalized. Child-rearing practices often involve neglect in the early years and harsh retribution when kids hit 9 or 10.
We’re all supposed to politely respect each other’s cultures. But some cultures are more progress-resistant than others, and a horrible tragedy was just exacerbated by one of them.
He then suggests that the real way forward is to install "
self-confident local leaders who will create No Excuses countercultures in places like Haiti, surrounding people — maybe just in a neighborhood or a school — with middle-class assumptions, an achievement ethos and tough, measurable demands", in order to to "
replace parts of the local culture with a highly demanding, highly intensive culture of achievement — involving everything from new child-rearing practices to stricter schools to better job performance." Presumably the next step is the
Sassy Gay Friend initiative, which will help struggling Haitians regain the self-confidence and 'sassitude' necessary to bootstrap themselves into a stronger market presence.
edit: but yeah i am kinda flabbergasted that a lot of people seem to be going with the SHIFTLESS, LAZY angle on this whole thing, jesus. neoliberalism wat dat