I'm writing it now but first I will answer these questions to dispel any misconceptions you might have
I don't want this topic to sidetrack more than it already has, so what is the problem exactly? Do you want us to completely scrap the idea and let GW be the way it is because it is "perfect"?
no. no one thinks it's perfect as it is, and we all agree that it's good to see something being done. we disagree about what's being done, which I'll address in my next post shortly.
Or do you WANT a new site but you want someone else to make it?
only if it comes to that, but I think it would be better for all of us if it doesn't.
Or is it that you want us to shut down GW because it is lost anyway?
not me, not marge or ramci or any of us guys who have been trying to make suggestions instead of saying LET IT DIE
1. It's a completely separate site. It's not going to be a new version of GW in more than that it is a successor in spirit and run by GWers, so it's obviously going to be different in a lot of ways, but probably not different enough to stop GWers from enjoying their stay there.
this is exactly what we're trying to make sure this happens. we don't think you've paid enough attention to things like "probably not different enough" and we're trying to provide some insight into how you can get this transition to work out much more smoothly
3. If you don't want the site to be focused on game development, you're free to make a site of your own that isn't. Nobody is stopping you. You could also visit Tomatoland and whatever other sites there are that originally spawned from GW. Nobody is stopping you.
It can be about game development, since that's what you personally want to do with the site because that's what you personally are interested in. but I don't see why it can't be more than that, and I'll address this in my next post when I get back. also, tomatoland was never meant to be a replacement for GW and in its current state I doubt it could.