Event The OLYMPIC GAMES!!! (Read 3487 times)

  • Avatar of dada
  • VILLAIN
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Administrator
  • Joined: Dec 27, 2002
  • Posts: 5538
Doesn't that kind of defeat the point of the olympics? I mean isn't it all about nations competing?
That's really just a way to get people riled up and excited about "them" competing for "their" honor. The Olympics should still be a perfectly fun and interesting event without tying the competitors to a particular region or exclusionary group of people. I mean I love the World Cup too, but the way people go crazy over "their" guys is just absurd.
  • Avatar of goldenratio
  • now das fresh
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Member
  • Joined: Jun 27, 2002
  • Posts: 4550
That's just like any sport though. Look at soccer where people have riots for "their guys", or any american football fans that identify with their hometown/whatever. I mean obviously that's all stupid, but the Olympics aren't any MORE stupid, i don't think. At least with Olympics you are competing on a global scale.
yes coulombs are "germaine", did you learn that word at talk like a dick school?
  • Avatar of Warped655
  • Scanner
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Member
  • Joined: Mar 25, 2004
  • Posts: 2416
The reason people WANT to have a favorite sports team is that it makes it all seem more important to them. If you watch a generic sporting event with 2 team with like, randomly selected athletes you'd be bored because you wouldn't care who won.

Not that I don't get bored anyway. I don't like watching sports usually (or playing most of them). Olympics are no exception.

The nationalism does make it a little more nauseating though.

"Go my favorite sports team!" -Brian Regan
  • Avatar of Belross
  • Dreamer
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Premium Member
  • Joined: Feb 10, 2002
  • Posts: 781
Re: the money spent - that money gets put back into the economy in various ways - money spent on advertising, planes, hotels, meals, etc. A lot of the time people talk about "wasting money" as if that money gets literally burned up and can never be used again, when in reality it goes back into the hands of real people. Spending money is good. I mean yeah you could always say "we should be spending this dollar on noble thing x instead of frivolous thing y!" but if you take that to the extreme you end up spending literally ALL of your money on humanitarian efforts which isn't really possible or even desirable. How about rather than spending that $60 on video games you send it to starving people in Africa huh?! There are other things less useful than the Olympics that we could be taking money from to put towards humanitarian aid that would make more sense.

Re: the nationalism, it's impossible to avoid in a competition where you are bringing together people from around the world. Even if you turned the Olympics into a massive free-for-all where everyone was competing against everyone else to be The Best (which is already sort of the case anyway since people compete to even get on the teams to go to the events) and stripped away focusing on the nationalities of the people involved, the general public at large would still choose that thing to pay attention to. You couldn't stop it if you tried. You need to abolish nations first in order to abolish nationalism.
0-------0
|Belross|
0-------0
  • Administrator
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Premium Member
  • Joined: Oct 30, 2005
  • Posts: 2534
Quote
You need to abolish nations first in order to abolish nationalism.




and we're just at page 2
  • Avatar of tuxedo marx
  • Fuckin' A.
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Premium Member
  • Joined: Oct 21, 2005
  • Posts: 4143
yeah well, you know who else hated internationalists??
  • Avatar of Faust
  • Comedy Bronze
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Global Moderator
  • Joined: Nov 27, 2001
  • Posts: 1018
Yo, I get the point about the extremer nationalist side of things, but I also think that friendly rivalry isn't a bad thing if it is actually FRIENDLY lol.

That said, historically that doesn't seem to be how it goes down. I'm also a little disturbed about the extreme lengths some nations go to to win medals - such as the recent examples of abuse in China.

However, cheering for a "side" just makes it a little bit more fun, but I guess there's a difference between "Go Italians, stop the US from winning ALL the medals" and "GO MY NATION, DESTROY THOSE SUBHUMAN ATHLETES FROM NATION X WHOM MY NATION HAS BEEF WITH".

Speaking of racism, a Lithuanian guy was being racist to some Black security guards recently, going so far as to Hitler salute them up. Another gamesgoer caught them on camera, and also the police nearby who DIDN'T DO ANYTHING TO STOP HIM. Great job upholding the law there guys.
Hey hey hey
  • Avatar of Faust
  • Comedy Bronze
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Global Moderator
  • Joined: Nov 27, 2001
  • Posts: 1018
Not only that Faust, but there's a female boxer from Ireland that some fight commentators have described as maybe the best female boxer ever, so that'd be cool to watch unfold at the very first Olympic Woman's Boxing event!

My favourite part of the Olympics is A. That Canada's goal was to come in 11th (we aim high in Canada) and we're currently in 30th with 3 bronzes, and that the host country is also getting its ass beat haha.

Haha, yay Canada!

Don't worry, when like DRESSAGE comes up it will be Team GB's time to shine XD
Hey hey hey
  • Avatar of crone_lover720
  • PEW PEW PEW
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Premium Member
  • Joined: Mar 25, 2002
  • Posts: 5554
USA isn't even a nation. and what exactly do you guys see wrong with people supporting their countries or nations? probably not the same thing I see. do you really want to dissolve all our borders so that everyone is the same (like us??)

my opinion on that is we lads shouldn't get to decide on that.
well sure, but for us ppl who don't actually decide anything I think it's important to note that maybe there's a good reason why some of these categories are separate and that's not necessarily a bad thing
  • Avatar of dada
  • VILLAIN
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Administrator
  • Joined: Dec 27, 2002
  • Posts: 5538
well sure, but for us ppl who don't actually decide anything I think it's important to note that maybe there's a good reason why some of these categories are separate and that's not necessarily a bad thing
I agree, and I'm sure if you asked, the overwhelming majority of women athletes would prefer it the way it is. Maybe someday there will be a movement within the women athletes world to change this, and when that time comes we have to listen and comply (most likely this will happen on a per-sport basis, iirc amateur hockey is already played mixed, and I'm sure some other sports are too), but until then the status quo should be preserved.
  • Avatar of dada
  • VILLAIN
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Administrator
  • Joined: Dec 27, 2002
  • Posts: 5538
do you really want to dissolve all our borders so that everyone is the same (like us??)
Dissolving borders doesn't mean "everyone is the same", it just means there won't be anymore artificial boundaries separating rich and poor people that also work to legitimize nation-state power centers.
  • Avatar of crone_lover720
  • PEW PEW PEW
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Premium Member
  • Joined: Mar 25, 2002
  • Posts: 5554
Dissolving borders doesn't mean "everyone is the same", it just means there won't be anymore artificial boundaries separating rich and poor people that also work to legitimize nation-state power centers.
those with more capital/cultural capital/social power (us) will continue to steamroll less powerful nations (which still exist w/o artificial borders) and cultures, causing a ton of problems for people of those cultures, and also backlash for the dominating group
  • Avatar of dada
  • VILLAIN
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Administrator
  • Joined: Dec 27, 2002
  • Posts: 5538
I don't envision the dissolution of the nation-state ceteris paribus. It's part of a much broader path towards an oppression-free society. I'm not gonna explain something so broad and complex in an Olympics topic but at least I should say that people who propose this don't see the concept in isolation.

On a much more conservative note, what I'd like is if people stopped being so stupidly nationalistic and just enjoyed the sports for what they are.
  • Avatar of Belross
  • Dreamer
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Premium Member
  • Joined: Feb 10, 2002
  • Posts: 781
do you really want to dissolve all our borders so that everyone is the same (like us??)
Personally, yes. I can't think of a single good reason for the concept of nationhood except that it allows groups of people to more easily polarize, compete with each other for resources, and dehumanize each other to the detriment of humanity as a whole. National pride doesn't exist to make you feel better, it exists to exclude other groups of people so that you can become superior to them.

Fuck this is all making me want to take a sociology class or read a book on the subject because I'm sure people much smarter than I have already worked it all out.
0-------0
|Belross|
0-------0
  • Avatar of goldenratio
  • now das fresh
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Member
  • Joined: Jun 27, 2002
  • Posts: 4550
Personally, yes. I can't think of a single good reason for the concept of nationhood except that it allows groups of people to more easily polarize, compete with each other for resources, and dehumanize each other to the detriment of humanity as a whole. National pride doesn't exist to make you feel better, it exists to exclude other groups of people so that you can become superior to them.

Fuck this is all making me want to take a sociology class or read a book on the subject because I'm sure people much smarter than I have already worked it all out.

See whenever I end up thinking this (religion too, imagine how much violence and bigotry could be "rid of" by eliminating religion), I always feel like they are just scapegoats and no artificial ideas (like religion or nations or social castes or whatever) are ever the "true and only" cause of these issues. If we rid the planet of all these things, I don't think the average amount of hatred/bigotry would change, at least not significantly. People will always find something to argue about and no matter how often or how many regular people learn about these social and psychological problems it will always be present. I'm not saying we should just give up trying to get people to give up these childish ideas and move on I don't think they are the true cause of any real issue.

Humans are just evolved and hard-wired in very specific ways that, probably, only evolution can ever get rid of. You can never get rid of nationalism, especially not by just getting rid of nations. I think if every single leader of every country on Earth could get together it's possible we could create a worldwide environment that would gradually evolve our own species to the point where we aren't "hard-wired" to be in small groups and to try and identify with only that group, etc (these are the sources of all these nationalism/culturalism/etc. issues) then we might stand a chance at like, "tricking" our evolution to proceed in a way we want. Humans really weren't designed to live with a global focus and intellectualism alone will never get us there.


If that sounds like a bunch of bs sorry, it's just I always end up thinking about how these dumb institutions and sort of "base" ideas (I mean seriously how non/anti-intellectual do you have to be to TRULY BELIEVE that what nation you live in has any bearing on ANYTHING AT ALL of importance, namely about character and legitimate-ness of a person) I always can't help but think we're doomed to act this way. Religion and football teams are just the modern expression of tribes and whatnot. There will always be something and I think we'll be in real trouble when the world is divided and wars are waged based on your indentation style in C++ or which serif font you prefer for TV screenplays versus film screenplays or which way you hang the toilet paper (over the top is always correct DIE BOTTOM-HANGING INFIDELS).
yes coulombs are "germaine", did you learn that word at talk like a dick school?
  • Avatar of Warped655
  • Scanner
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Member
  • Joined: Mar 25, 2004
  • Posts: 2416
Quote
or which way you hang the toilet paper (over the top is always correct DIE BOTTOM-HANGING INFIDELS).
Ugh I hate how this is even a topic of debate, even 'silly debate'. (I'm pretty sure its solely because of a fucking commercial, which fuels my rage of dumb commercials a bit more) Like I have an 'opinion' on it. But to share it would be to legitimize it as something to debate. I have actually encountered people arguing about this and it makes me want to SLAP THEM. Talk about anti-intellectualism. "heh heh I'd rather discuss this thing of absolutely no importance rather than discuss something that matters because serious discussion is to scary for my cave-person brain".

Sorry random bitter tangent.

But yeah the rest of your post is a bit pessimistic. I think its pretty impractical to assume we will KILL each other over inconsequential things that are clearly inconsequential to even laymen.

Only things that seem important but are in fact inconsequential. Like whether you believe/worship in one god or the other or live in one place or the other. This is why we need to educate and explain to people why killing each other over such shit is bad (really killing people in general is bad but you get the picture). And maybe abolish those things all together.
  • Avatar of crone_lover720
  • PEW PEW PEW
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Premium Member
  • Joined: Mar 25, 2002
  • Posts: 5554
people want to feel like they're part of something/belong somewhere, and counter-strike clans are only suitable for a minuscule number of people

kinda agree with GR
Personally, yes. I can't think of a single good reason for the concept of nationhood except that it allows groups of people to more easily polarize, compete with each other for resources, and dehumanize each other to the detriment of humanity as a whole. National pride doesn't exist to make you feel better, it exists to exclude other groups of people so that you can become superior to them.

Fuck this is all making me want to take a sociology class or read a book on the subject because I'm sure people much smarter than I have already worked it all out.
they have, though not necessarily smarter people, and I never had a sociology class. the average person thinks about this stuff in terms of modernization theory, because that's what we learn in school and from the media and everything, but it's incorrect, capitalistic, and part of our western bias. what I'm talking about is world systems theory. saying you want to remove all boundaries sounds like a great idea, if you're a member of a powerful global ("western") civilization. otherwise, you're probably going to see your culture, way of life, and personal values slowly be destroyed and replaced by something alien. and what can these people do about it? what have they already tried doing about it in asia and the middle-east

it's not our differences that are the problem!!

I don't envision the dissolution of the nation-state ceteris paribus. It's part of a much broader path towards an oppression-free society. I'm not gonna explain something so broad and complex in an Olympics topic but at least I should say that people who propose this don't see the concept in isolation.

On a much more conservative note, what I'd like is if people stopped being so stupidly nationalistic and just enjoyed the sports for what they are.
your conception of oppression and your values aren't the same as everyone's, and idk on what grounds you could establish yours are right for the entire world and theirs aren't, or how you could peaceably convince them. that's typical western bias!
  • Avatar of Faust
  • Comedy Bronze
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Global Moderator
  • Joined: Nov 27, 2001
  • Posts: 1018

But yeah the rest of your post is a bit pessimistic. I think its pretty impractical to assume we will KILL each other over inconsequential things that are clearly inconsequential to even laymen.


As I just threatened you with VIOLENCE in another thread for pronouncing a word differently to me, I feel that you are giving people too much credit with this statement XD!!
Hey hey hey
  • Avatar of crone_lover720
  • PEW PEW PEW
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Premium Member
  • Joined: Mar 25, 2002
  • Posts: 5554
the olympics are probably the best way to deal with national pride. yeah, there are problems, but can you think of anything better than sating national belonging and pride through peaceful sports, rather than eg war? where's that quote about Americans feeling bad that they haven't beaten up anyone in a war in a while

or is the problem that we netizens don't really feel like we belong to any nation and the Olympics haven't upgraded to our Web 2.0 societies yet. long jump for the gamers category, saltw versus ggz
  • Avatar of Faust
  • Comedy Bronze
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Global Moderator
  • Joined: Nov 27, 2001
  • Posts: 1018
PS: Rowing tomorrow, Team GB is relying on Helen Glover and Heather Iforgethername to get UK's first gold! If they win, they'll be the first ever women to win gold for rowing for the UK! That'd stick it to those Oxford punks!

Also if Hiroshi Hoketsu doesn't win a gold for dressage I'll cry my eyes up. He's 72 and hasn't seen his wife for a year as he's been training in Germany, while she stays at their home in Japan. He is one of my OLYMPIC HEROES this year!
Hey hey hey