man I love you hundley.
You're so eloquent, whereas I stumble in the process (something about the forum format makes me write exceptionally bad) of trying to explain myself.
I share that same spirit. That targ spirit. That part that you wrote speaks to me very truly, and I know it did to Diggity Dawg too. Who I miss. Fuck, where is he. (I understood that the intent of FIERCE NIGGAR was the opposite as well.)
in case you care, targ still is part of my life. I dont manifest it much, but it has been incepted into my DNA
Yeah, I had a feeling this is kinda what you were trying to say all along, but kinda got caught up in this stupid rapid-fire debate to say it.
It's been a bit of a bummer seeing the last couple pages of this topic. I can understand why people would not have the same fondness for that bullshit as we do, as you can take a pretty objective approach to how stupid it all was, but that rubbish was pretty important to us for our childish reasons. It was this thing we had, and it was neat being a part of it, particularly considering all the fun stuff that came from it. I guess it's really inevitable that this would happen when you have this kinda foolish, silly entity that some people see as a period of their personal growth but could pretty easily be just written off as bad humor. Oh well!!!
I'm glad to see I'm not the only targ lifer.
It's not the same as it was, but I still got that shit in my blood. Probably always will. RUINED FOR ALL ETERNITY.
i understand the logic in comedians having freedom and pushing boundaries - and for some dark humor can even be a coping mechanism through some kind of trauma - but more often than not these jokes are always lazy and unfunny and said mostly for dumb shock value. like take that carlin bit for example. completely ignoring the subject matter, there was nothing about it that made me think 'ok this could be kinda funny i guess'. he seemed to think that there was something inherently funny in being silly about a serious issue and that was basically the extent of the whole bit. like there was nothing clever about it at all. any dumb hack could've made the same joke and often those are exactly the kinds of shitty jokes you hear from people who've watched too much family guy or tosh.0.
pretty broad generalization, i think.
"i understand the logic in comedians having freedom and pushing boundaries ... but more often than not these jokes are always lazy and unfunny and said mostly for dumb shock value."
correct me if i'm wrong, but this is basically saying that satire breeds laziness? i mean, that's the internal logic for comedians to push boundaries, to challenge the norm and rationale of acceptable behavior and thought. some comedians do it poorly, sure, or do it for no reason other than to be noticeable, but i don't think their fuckups really override the reason why comedians do this to begin with. it's bad, sure, but "more often than not are always lazy and unfunny" suggests some intrinsic failings in this method of comedy, which i genuinely disagree with.
i don't think you're really trying to say this, or really mean this. i'm guessing you're just unusually irritated to see comedians fuck up serious topics, and i can respect that. i'm not really terribly bothered by it myself, and humorists really need to step extremely far over the line to bother me, but that's purely my own sentiment. i've tried(and failed) enough in comedy to know that sometimes you throw everything and the kitchen sink out there. sometimes stepping way over that line is the right thing to do, sometimes it isn't, and it can be hard to tell. i usually save my venom and intense scrutiny for comics who are expressing a genuine, quantifiable negative viewpoint, rather than one that is just obliviously reaching for a joke in the taboo, which is usually the case for a comedian not understanding a topic they're trying to satirize.