By the way a prime example of needless arguing is also Star Wars.
 
Now, personally, I prefer the prequel trilogy over the original trilogy. I was born in 1990 and saw the PT before the OT.
 
Usually saying that is enough to get flamed. I've argued my point a million times, but to people who saw the original Star Wars first (and even to some who did not see it first), the OT is better no matter what.
 
So I just gave up on that and decided to respect their opinion. And hopefully they will respect mine.

Mace Windu alone makes the prequels objectively better then the originals.

Really? Mace Windu? Isn't Mace Windu like famous for being Samuel L. Jackson's least interesting character.

Really? Mace Windu? Isn't Mace Windu like famous for being Samuel L. Jackson's least interesting character. ​

 
Another classic example of internet arguing, randomly making up facts up to support your point.

You're right The One. We shouldn't argue about Star Wars. Mace Windu was an excellent character full of... character.

i hate u guys

I fucken tried to elevate the level of discourse, talkin brains and shit, but then pokemon and then the star wars prequels and that's just not a good rhetorical place to be

you only made it worse

Quote from: The One on February 24, 2013, 07:58:49 pm

Mace Windu alone makes the prequels objectively better then the originals.

 
So what is Lando to you? Chopped liver?
 
Because to me he is an objectively better character than Mace Windu. You can argue otherwise, but be warned that I will take any such argument as the equivalent of arguing that Anakin Skywalker is a better character than Han Solo.

 
Oh yeah a backstabbing snitch is so much better then a loyal but badass Jedi. But he redeemed himself later on, so it's all good, right?
 
Mace Windu's lightsaber is PURPLE. Making him the only dude in the galaxy with a lightsaber that's not green, blue, or red. That is badass.