Well I was reminded a lot of the Tom Cruise War of the Worlds with blair witch. Yea the visuals were great the audio I suppose too (I was pretty engrossed in it) and the acting and dialogue were very good I thought. But I can't help thinking so what afterwards. It's just like War of the Worlds where you follow just a few people and their tiny unimportant adventure. And I mean I didn't want a scientist to come out and say "Oh hey this is what it is" or whatever, but at the same time I was hoping for more clues than what was given. I mean there a ARG to go with this right? But all the mystery and all the anticipation for this was pointless as it was exactly what you gathered from the trailer, nothing more or less.

I still thought it was fun to watch and I'd rate it high or whatever and recommend it.

What I wonder about is, do you actually get to see the monster? or monsters, as I gathered
Because as far as I read, it doesn't actually show well in the movie. If that's
actually true, I'd be a real let-down for me.

Yea was the fact that it had lungs on the side of it's head important or something?? I only ask because it seemed like the major focus of the monster in that last seen

1. Made me fucking nauseous.  The constant running scenes became extremely annoying.

2. What the hell was with that ending? The least they could do is at least have someone pick up the tape recorder a year later or SOMETHING, it was way too abrupt. The very last black screen remained for 10 seconds and when the credits rolled the audience simultaneously all yelled "what the? that's it?"

3. Pretty much just simulates 9/11 and the Iraq war.

4. What the fuck just happened?


Not that bad of a movie otherwise, though -- it's basically Godzilla meets Blair With Project.  Also, Nokia product placement was far too obvious.

Cool story my brother threw up but it was really was a combination of the guy next to him was pretty smelly and the motion sickness. But Trystero was saying he heard a lot of people threw up so that's really funny.