Weird Baby learned to read at nine months! (Read 2345 times)

  • Avatar of Doktormartini
  • Stop Radioactivity!
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Premium Member
  • Joined: Apr 24, 2003
  • Posts: 1949
This is pretty amazing...apparently a baby has learned to recognize words at 9 months, and at 18 months she was reading them. 
http://gigglesugar.com/670138

What are your thoughts on this?  Like, should they be trying to get their baby to read at such a young age?  Are there advantages/disadvantages?  It's just seems like kids keep doing things at younger and younger ages. 
Dok Choy
  • None of them knew they were robots.
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Premium Member
  • Joined: Nov 5, 2006
  • Posts: 3242
Wow, if a baby can maybe the scientists will find a monkey that can read and write too, it would be awesome if they did this!
Play Raimond Ex (if you haven't already)


I'll not TAKE ANYTHING you write like this seriously because it looks dumb
  • Avatar of Mateui
  • GW Staff: Article Alcoholic (Current Mood: Happy!)
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Premium Member
  • Joined: Aug 20, 2002
  • Posts: 1685
Yeah, the earlier the better. Infancy is such a crucial period for learning that a child can absorb so much information. The more you can teach them then the more prepared they'll be for future learning. Plus, it's easier to teach a child when they're younger, and if you instill within them the desire to learn they'll enjoy doing so later on.
  • huh?
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Premium Member
  • Joined: Sep 16, 2005
  • Posts: 432
Wow, that's pretty impressive. He does have a great point. It is kinda funny how we still follow the old tradition of starting school when we're 5 when children are doing more and more at a younger age. For example, the applicants to colleges now are increasingly more competitive. They were raised with better and better technology. It would make sense that they can also start learning at an earlier age.

  • Avatar of Cheesy Doritos
  • Moses
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Premium Member
  • Joined: Oct 19, 2003
  • Posts: 958
I'm going to have a baby and teach him to do my job at 9 months so I can relax. Child work laws be damned.
  • Avatar of Roman
  • Gameboy Advanced Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Premium Member
  • Joined: Apr 9, 2002
  • Posts: 1460
maybe one day we can have baby scientists
  • Avatar of DarkPriest
  • Gamemaker > Rm2k
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Premium Member
  • Joined: Nov 27, 2001
  • Posts: 423
I don't know, I think I'll prefer giving my children (should they appear at some point) a normal childhood of fun and games instead of learning about nuclear physics at the age of 3.
<Drule> I can play the didgeridoo actually
<Drule> some guy on the street taught me
<Drule> come to think of it
<Drule> it was pretty gross how I played on his didgeridoo

so wrong...
  • Avatar of Vellfire
  • TV people want to leave
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Premium Member
  • Joined: Feb 13, 2004
  • Posts: 9602
Why is this listed under humor, and why can't I find anything about it anywhere else?
I love this hobby - stealing your mother's diary
BRRING! BRRING!
Hello!  It's me, Vellfire!  FOLLOW ME ON TWITTER! ... Bye!  CLICK!  @gidgetnomates
  • Avatar of Doktormartini
  • Stop Radioactivity!
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Premium Member
  • Joined: Apr 24, 2003
  • Posts: 1949
My German teacher said that lots of times kids learn languages better than adults because adults are so focused on just translating shit.
Dok Choy
  • Avatar of Roman
  • Gameboy Advanced Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Premium Member
  • Joined: Apr 9, 2002
  • Posts: 1460
I don't know, I think I'll prefer giving my children (should they appear at some point) a normal childhood of fun and games instead of learning about nuclear physics at the age of 3.

but think about how cute it would be

you could give him a little lab coat and glasses
  • None of them knew they were robots.
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Premium Member
  • Joined: Nov 5, 2006
  • Posts: 3242
Why is this listed under humor, and why can't I find anything about it anywhere else?

Because it's a HOAX duh
Play Raimond Ex (if you haven't already)


I'll not TAKE ANYTHING you write like this seriously because it looks dumb
  • Avatar of Roman
  • Gameboy Advanced Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Premium Member
  • Joined: Apr 9, 2002
  • Posts: 1460
Because it's a HOAX duh

so... no baby scientists?

man
  • Avatar of GirlBones
  • I will.
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Premium Member
  • Joined: Mar 14, 2006
  • Posts: 1450
When I was in highschool, they would occasionally try to teach us how to recognize a good source on the internet. I always thought they were dumb lessons, because it's generally pretty simple to determine the quality of info online, but Doktormartini shows me again and again why those lessons were important.
boop oop a doop
  • Avatar of Vellfire
  • TV people want to leave
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Premium Member
  • Joined: Feb 13, 2004
  • Posts: 9602
Dang I don't see how anyone can see this and not even start to question whether or not it's true.
I love this hobby - stealing your mother's diary
BRRING! BRRING!
Hello!  It's me, Vellfire!  FOLLOW ME ON TWITTER! ... Bye!  CLICK!  @gidgetnomates
  • None of them knew they were robots.
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Premium Member
  • Joined: Nov 5, 2006
  • Posts: 3242
so... no baby scientists?

man

Not really, in fact there's a very serious documentary about this, it's about babies that were genetic engineered to become "smart" and they fed them a lot of ritalin
Play Raimond Ex (if you haven't already)


I'll not TAKE ANYTHING you write like this seriously because it looks dumb
  • Avatar of the_bub_from_the_pit
  • Power to the flowers
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Member
  • Joined: Dec 17, 2005
  • Posts: 1608
I feel ripped off. I used to know Hebrew as a kid but then when I moved to Canada English replaced it and I forgot it all :(
  • Avatar of ATARI
  • Lichens!
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Premium Member
  • Joined: Oct 26, 2002
  • Posts: 4136
I think this could become a great new television series: 

"lil' scientists"
  • Avatar of Shepperd
  • MUSULMAEN
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Premium Member
  • Joined: Apr 23, 2004
  • Posts: 2618
uh.. my sister could read by that age.

This is WAY OLD SHIT


EDIT: my mum applied the same procedure on me but a little later because she found about it after having me for a while.

The cons is that you become a very intellectual kid from early age, develop a huge amount of imagination, first grades are a breeze but you fail at social interaction because YOU ARE TOO FUCKING AHEAD OF YOUR STANDARIZED TIME
Last Edit: October 28, 2007, 10:38:08 pm by Shepperd
  • Avatar of hobo2
  • guns or swords?
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Premium Member
  • Joined: Jan 18, 2004
  • Posts: 1018
I don't know, I think I'll prefer giving my children (should they appear at some point) a normal childhood of fun and games instead of learning about nuclear physics at the age of 3.

Exactly. I dislike how people are rushing life in order to "stay competitive." Relax a bit, life shouldn't be only about work. Let the kid be a kid.
  • aye ess dee eff el cay jay ache
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Premium Member
  • Joined: Jun 24, 2005
  • Posts: 5149
Yeah, the earlier the better. Infancy is such a crucial period for learning that a child can absorb so much information. The more you can teach them then the more prepared they'll be for future learning. Plus, it's easier to teach a child when they're younger, and if you instill within them the desire to learn they'll enjoy doing so later on.

jam packing your kid full of information isn't always the best, kids need time to think about things and develop an imagination else they'll just spout out what they were told when they grow up!

also: autism!
I USE Q'S INSTEQD OF Q'S