He was not right he was just insane or something like that.

Now I ask you, can we allow this kind of people who can't control themselves to live together with more normal people?

You're the one who was going to kill your uncle or whatever because he wanted to cut your dog's tail off. You think this is normal or even remotely controlled?

dude must have been pretty fucked up to stab another life form. honestly can you actually see yourself STABBING a living being? I mean a random dog (keep in mind not MINE) came after me with an intent to kill me, I would kick it until it passed out. now this guy, his own fucking dog. wow. goes to show how fucked up this world is eh

dude must have been pretty fucked up to stab another life form. honestly can you actually see yourself STABBING a living being? I mean a random dog (keep in mind not MINE) came after me with an intent to kill me, I would kick it until it passed out. now this guy, his own fucking dog. wow. goes to show how fucked up this world is eh

If a dog came after me with an intent to kill me (and it was capable of doing so), I'd waste no time in stabbing it. It's me or the dog in that case and that's not a very hard choice. But if it wasn't capable of actually killing me, I'd probably just kick it out of the way or try to get it calmed down or something.

dude must have been pretty fucked up to stab another life form. honestly can you actually see yourself STABBING a living being? I mean a random dog (keep in mind not MINE) came after me with an intent to kill me, I would kick it until it passed out. now this guy, his own fucking dog. wow. goes to show how fucked up this world is eh

if something comes at me with the intent to kill i will kill it the fuck back. No question about it, I'll protect my life with any means I have! Besides a dogs life is nothing compared to a humans.

if something comes at me with the intent to kill i will kill it the fuck back. No question about it, I'll protect my life with any means I have! Besides a dogs life is nothing compared to a humans.

But the dog was chained. It wasn't coming at anyone with the intent to kill anyone.

Also if someone killed a dog or any other animal I liked for no reason at all other than they being insane I'd want to commit mass murder against that person. Don't say that  a "dog's life is nothing compared to a human's" because there are a lot of people that nobody would care about if they died.

--

You're the one who was going to kill your uncle or whatever because he wanted to cut your dog's tail off. You think this is normal or even remotely controlled?

No I wasn't going to kill anyone, I just wanted to. But I didn't. And do you know why? Because I control myself.

He's right though. As for your argument...there are many more dogs that nobody would care about if they died than there are people. So yeah, shitty argument.

Doesn't justify killing the dog, but he is right.

I'm pretty sure this is not always the case.

But the dog was chained. It wasn't coming at anyone with the intent to kill anyone.

Also if someone killed a dog or any other animal I liked for no reason at all other than they being insane I'd want to commit mass murder against that person.

You can't commit mass murder against a single person, as the "mass" part means more than one.

Yeah, but it is 99.9% of the time, and that's what really matters. If you asked someone, "would you rather have that random person or that random dog killed," most people would pick the dog (unless they happen to be crazy animal lovers).

Again, just because not everyone would rather have a dog die over a human doesn't mean that your point is valid. There's always an exception to everything (well, almost everything). A human life is still more valuable than a dog's.

But then you're generalizing. Generalization is always wrong.

Why do you guys even bother to argue with Inri? Let's get back on topic.

Well, it could be argued that this topic has ran it's course, and it could also be argued that a topic like this didn't even really have a point to begin with since there is only so much to discuss here (oh my gawd what a horrible man ad infinum), but whatever.

Why do you guys even bother to argue with Inri? Let's get back on topic.

Well, it could be argued that this topic has ran it's course, and it could also be argued that a topic like this didn't even really have a point to begin with since there is only so much to discuss here (oh my gawd what a horrible man ad infinum), but whatever.

Thank you for setting GW on the path of righteousness!

I know, I try.

What does "this topic has run its course" mean? Have all the people who matter had their say? Did we all get our big moral arguments out? Did we go off topic, then have someone mini-mod the conversation unsuccessfully back onto said topic?

Did Paragon come in and ruin the topic?