to say he didn't know about the newsletters for 20 years is not possible. if you can somehow reason this then tell me why someone so incompetent as to allow a newsletter written under his name for 20 years with the most racist shit possible (MLK IS A GAY PEDOPHILE and THE LA ROITS STOPPED WHEN BLACKIE WENT TO PICK UP HIS WELFARE CHECK) could possibly be a competent politician is beyond me. something like this is so incredibly stupid and the lack of oversight with something he put his name on is astronomical.
you cannot deny this. stop talking about HEH THE BURDEN OF PROOF IS ON YOU TO PROVE HE REALLY WROTE IT. you are retarded if you use this defense. ron paul endorsed the newletters. it means nothing if he wrote it, at the end of the day he approved of it even if he didnt read it (hint: not an excuse). he even admitted it was as good as his own writing because it would confuse people to say otherwise, although now he is saying otherwise because he has to clear his record. if ron paul ever did become a real presidential candidate he would be torn to shreds just on the newsletters alone, barring any of his wacky policies. the most obvious contradiction of ron pauls ROCK SOLID INTEGRITY was proposing a bill for cold war medals (which would cost TAX PAYERS 200+ MILLION):
http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c107:H.R.3417:yet he denied the rosa parks medal when it was self funded by the u.s. mint (turning the vote into basically IS IT A GOOD IDEA TO GIVE ROSA PARKS A MEDAL???) saying the taxpayers shouldn't have to pay for it. ron pauls voting record is horrible in general, this, the we the people act, and the darfur bill are just the most obvious ones.
think about 20 years. that is probably longer than the age of most ron paul supporters (based off multiple graphs i saw that tracked the statistics of donations to ron paul, the large majority was male and young. i will post it if you would like to try and argue it). think about this again. do you think anyone should be able to be a potential president given they made such a gargantuan mistake that spans 20 years? it's virtually impossible to get you to agree ron pauls ideas are retarded, but surely you must agree something like this is such a grand error, that it at least should put DOUBT in peoples minds about his ability to be president. for most people it has been enough to convince them he is completely out of his fucking mind.
every time i have seen a paul supporter REBUT CLAIMS they do it by simply saying YOU ARE WRONG. there is no amount of evidence in the world that will ever convince you otherwise. you are already solid in your belief, even given that history paints a horrible record for libertarianism and the fact that no real nation uses a government like it. this results in made up GOBBLEDEGOOK that, by the way, as dada pointed out, consists of NU-UH BECAUSE <MADE UP SHIT> which no one other than yourself believes. don't even bother typing if you aren't going to post links with reputable sources. saying "well times have changed this is why it will work" doesn't cut it. post real, solid evidence of your claims. there is a reason ron paul has failed in his presidential bid, there is a reason the vast majority of this multinational forum thinks he is a KOOK, and you guys are doing no favours in trying to establish the credibility of libertarianism or ron paul.
all this said, a libertarian "government" will never ever happen in a civilizised society. i am going to wager to say this is why you guys are so angry because you think THE WORLD IS RETARDED I AM THE ONLY SANE PERSON AHGHHHHHH. the whole world is going to continue to laugh at libertarians and paul supporters, while you silently stew truly believing libertarians are the "real majority" but the world is too full of "sheeples" for it to ever come to fruition.
Gaming World Forums
U.S Presidential Primary Thread
