Politics U.S Presidential Primary Thread (Read 20603 times)

  • Avatar of Moses
  • Grammarian
  • Group: Member
  • Joined: Feb 27, 2008
  • Posts: 21
it's been stated about 6,000 times that she has to win over 60% of the delegates in every state yet to come to even TIE obama in pledged delegates.
That and she's a giant bitch.

I was really surprised last night's polls turned out the way they did.  I was pretty sure Obama would get Texas, and Hillary would get Vermont.  I live in Vermont, and everyone I've to whom I've talked has said they're voting/voted for Hillary.  I guess that's just my town, though.
http://www.averagehardcoregamer.com/
  • Comrade!
  • Group: Member
  • Joined: Dec 19, 2005
  • Posts: 68
The Chairman's Quest (RM2k3) 100% Complete - http://www.gamingw.net/forums/index.php?topic=47923
Topic thread contains download links.
  • Avatar of jamie
  • ruined former youth seeking atonement
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Premium Member
  • Joined: Jun 4, 2003
  • Posts: 3581
not appreciating that one bit rwildcat.
  • Group: Member
  • Joined: Mar 5, 2008
  • Posts: 14


thats funny. i cant stop watchin it :fogetlaugh:
  • Avatar of Cho
  • Comrade!
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Member
  • Joined: Jun 6, 2004
  • Posts: 438
Quote
Hillary and Bill aren't the same person? Well damn, you'd think she was basing her entire "experience" claim on her being.. his wife during his presidency or something.

Also that whole "Hey I've been active in politics since I was like, 18, which was before Obama was even born" thing. But let's ignore that and focus on the fact that she was just the First Lady (which, I mean, still, that's more experience in the White House than Obama or McCain).

Quote
And uh, as a DEMOCRATIC CANDIDATE FOR PRESIDENT, you don't go saying that the other potential DEMOCRATIC CANDIDATE FOR PRESIDENT is not as qualified to be president compared to the REPUBLICAN nominee for president. Unless of course you're unbelievably desperate and selfish and will stop at nothing to get the nomination, even if it means absolute suicide for you and your party.

So like, McCain shouldn't say that he thinks Obama would make a better president than Ron Paul? It shouldn't be about what's best for the party, it should be about what's best for the American people. HEY MAYBE WE WOULDN'T HAVE AS MANY PROBLEMS IN THIS COUNTRY IF DEMOCRATS AND REPUBLICANS DIDN'T SPEND SO MUCH TIME DEMONIZING EACH OTHER???? idk tho. Frankly, it shows that she's willing to bridge the gap between the parties, something Obama only talks about  :fogetshh:

Quote
edit: and christ go watch the news or something. it's been stated about 6,000 times that she has to win over 60% of the delegates in every state yet to come to even TIE obama in pledged delegates.

Which, realistically, she could do. In fact, if I were to watch the news right now, they'd all tell me she's gaining momentum or whatever the hell term they're using. But you're right, its not like a Democrat to screw up his front runner status during the primaries by doing something stupid.

Hey I bet if Michigan and Florida get to actually have delegates, I bet all the Obama supporters will call Clinton an evil conniving bitch who's trying to cheat their man out of his nomination.

EDIT:
Something I don't feel like quoting, but you brought up the telephone ad earlier. I just wanted to point out that Obama's campaign retaliated with this. Obama's just as guilty of fearmongering as Clinton.
Last Edit: March 06, 2008, 05:42:45 am by Cho
  • Avatar of The Truth
  • SB is unaware that Dimmu sucks
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Premium Member
  • Joined: May 15, 2003
  • Posts: 1204


Hey I bet if Michigan and Florida get to actually have delegates, I bet all the Obama supporters will call Clinton an evil conniving bitch who's trying to cheat their man out of his nomination.

what would that make her then?
--- Back when we were young and loved the internet....
  • Avatar of cowardknower
  • The MONSTER that lives inside of your COUCH!
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Premium Member
  • Joined: Aug 7, 2002
  • Posts: 1807
i will vote for whoever does something about reality tv
  • Avatar of Vellfire
  • TV people want to leave
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Premium Member
  • Joined: Feb 13, 2004
  • Posts: 9602
The whole thing about experience pisses me off as a basis for voting for someone.

guess who had experience?  george w bush!
I love this hobby - stealing your mother's diary
BRRING! BRRING!
Hello!  It's me, Vellfire!  FOLLOW ME ON TWITTER! ... Bye!  CLICK!  @gidgetnomates
  • Avatar of BlackRaven
  • Comrade!
  • Pip
  • Group: Premium Member
  • Joined: Dec 18, 2005
  • Posts: 111
Using experience as the main criterium makes a dictatorship a very viable alternative.
  • Avatar of Xeno|Soft
  • Chicken Hunter
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Premium Member
  • Joined: Jun 18, 2002
  • Posts: 564

Hey I bet if Michigan and Florida get to actually have delegates, I bet all the Obama supporters will call Clinton an evil conniving bitch who's trying to cheat their man out of his nomination.

EDIT:
Something I don't feel like quoting, but you brought up the telephone ad earlier. I just wanted to point out that Obama's campaign retaliated with this. Obama's just as guilty of fearmongering as Clinton.

1. You just lost your bet, Obama's stance is that he's all game for Michigan and Florida, as long as they are redone, because his name wasn't even on the ballot in Michigan, and In Both states he wasn't allowed to campaign. And he was following the rules layed down.

2. The add was not fear mongering, it was mocking in my opinion, Clintions ad. He even got laughs out of it in the last couple of speeches he made.
  • Avatar of Finality
  • Still a Roleplay Reformer...
  • Group: Premium Member
  • Joined: Feb 4, 2002
  • Posts: 79
It was no surprise Hilary won Texas. Cause they rather choose a white woman than a black man. Racist ass America.
  • Avatar of Ryan
  • thx ds k?
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Premium Member
  • Joined: Oct 22, 2003
  • Posts: 4460
Also that whole "Hey I've been active in politics since I was like, 18, which was before Obama was even born" thing. But let's ignore that and focus on the fact that she was just the First Lady (which, I mean, still, that's more experience in the White House than Obama or McCain).

how is being active in politics in any way a measure of how much experience you have towards RUNNING A COUNTRY? is rush limbaugh experienced enough to be president? how about chris matthews?

and.. how is being FIRST LADY in any way a qualifier to RUN THE COUNTRY? is barbara bush qualified to run the country? what about betty ford?

Quote
So like, McCain shouldn't say that he thinks Obama would make a better president than Ron Paul? It shouldn't be about what's best for the party, it should be about what's best for the American people. HEY MAYBE WE WOULDN'T HAVE AS MANY PROBLEMS IN THIS COUNTRY IF DEMOCRATS AND REPUBLICANS DIDN'T SPEND SO MUCH TIME DEMONIZING EACH OTHER???? idk tho. Frankly, it shows that she's willing to bridge the gap between the parties, something Obama only talks about

uhh.. no? since when did politicians give a shit about what was best for the american people?  they want what is best for them and (concurrently) best for their party. besides, ron paul is not a relevant candidate with a serious chance at the nomination. obama is. hillary is throwing the fucking kitchen sink at him and shit like that will destroy her political career if she fails to get the nomination.

Quote
Which, realistically, she could do. In fact, if I were to watch the news right now, they'd all tell me she's gaining momentum or whatever the hell term they're using. But you're right, its not like a Democrat to screw up his front runner status during the primaries by doing something stupid.

so you think there is a realistic chance that hillary will get 60% (or even win) wyoming, mississippi (largest % of african americans in the country!), indiana, or north carolina? sorry but every one of those states has like 20 point margins between obama and clinton. everyone with even the slightest bit of intelligence knows that clinton can not overturn obama's delegate lead. she just can't. her only option is to convince the superdelegates to swing to her.

and if a huge obama scandal does erupt, ok fine. but that's still besides the point: clinton will not win this thing based on pledged delegates

ssorry to burst your bubble...
Last Edit: March 06, 2008, 07:11:02 pm by Ryan
  • Avatar of Impeal
  • Quoth the raven "Nevermore."
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Premium Member
  • Joined: May 9, 2002
  • Posts: 849
The whole thing about experience pisses me off as a basis for voting for someone.

guess who had experience?  george w bush!
Well yeah, that's a good point, but I think the argument has even worse problems with it.

I think the experience, aside from jading her, makes it likely for her to have a much larger personal agenda. If she were to ultimately win the presidency, the past four presidents will've been bush, clinton, bush, clinton. So yeah, people argue the experience thing as if it's something in her favor, but really it's just highlighting that she's part of a political dynasty, and I don't know why anyone would like that.
  • Firbolg Warrior
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Premium Member
  • Joined: Dec 9, 2002
  • Posts: 1201
The whole thing about experience pisses me off as a basis for voting for someone.

Same here.  The thing that really pisses me off though is that it's a really stupid argument to make since McCain has a hell of a lot more experience than she does.  It's an argument that would backfire on her if she used it in the general election. 
Gaming World Mini City: Population, Industry, Transportation, Security Current rank 3950.
Click a different link each day.
  • Avatar of dada
  • VILLAIN
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Administrator
  • Joined: Dec 27, 2002
  • Posts: 5538
I think the experience, aside from jading her, makes it likely for her to have a much larger personal agenda.
Yeah, that's the thing. Obama is a (relatively) young politician who hasn't allowed himself to be corrupted by the game of politics.
  • Avatar of Neophyte
  • Master of Darkness
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Premium Member
  • Joined: Apr 20, 2003
  • Posts: 1296
This is insane, Obama raised $55 million dollars during the month of February.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/23504993/
I really don't like how Hillary plays that experience card as well. It's obvious experience doesn't matter. I hate how people just want the same shit over again(Bush, Clinton, Bush), it sickens me really.
  • Avatar of The Truth
  • SB is unaware that Dimmu sucks
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Premium Member
  • Joined: May 15, 2003
  • Posts: 1204
Uh, no to burst your bubble Velfarre but I don't like misinformation being spread.

Dubya had LESS experience than Obama, and ZERO legislative experience.
--- Back when we were young and loved the internet....
  • Avatar of Xeno|Soft
  • Chicken Hunter
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Premium Member
  • Joined: Jun 18, 2002
  • Posts: 564
Yeah he came directly from being a CEO for some oil company I beleive.
  • Avatar of Vellfire
  • TV people want to leave
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Premium Member
  • Joined: Feb 13, 2004
  • Posts: 9602
Uh, no to burst your bubble Velfarre but I don't like misinformation being spread.

Dubya had LESS experience than Obama, and ZERO legislative experience.

yeah but he was reelected which means he had experience being a president


he was still FUCKING BAD AT IT
I love this hobby - stealing your mother's diary
BRRING! BRRING!
Hello!  It's me, Vellfire!  FOLLOW ME ON TWITTER! ... Bye!  CLICK!  @gidgetnomates
  • Avatar of Sarhan
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Member
  • Joined: Dec 5, 2005
  • Posts: 943
ssorry to burst your bubble...

This is great news. I've been hearing how hard it would be for Hillary to catch up in delegates, but I never understood why. Great article.

I want to see what Cho has to say now.

Locked