GW GW community site news and staff recruitment (Read 3190 times)

  • Avatar of DS
  • DragonSlayer o_O
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Member
  • Joined: Jul 7, 2002
  • Posts: 2668
EDIT: Applications are closed.

First of all, no, GW6 is not finished, I bet you all had that in mind when you saw the topic title but read further and you'll know what this is about!

We have decided to put up a temporary site until GW6 is finished. Currently our main site isn't interesting at all and we really want to have something to attract new members and also let our current members know about what's going on in the community. The site we'll be using works like a blog, it's going to have community related articles about different forum events, updates on GW's situation and just generally interesting forum topics (links included) and so on. Plus it's not only limited to what's happening in the community right now. For example, articles about GW's past events or history are good too. We welcome anything which people would be interested in. That's really the only criteria our temporary site is going to have for articles. It's not going to be something overly serious, it's there to show that we have a very interesting community. A way to increase activity. We have had plans for a community section once GW6 is eventually finished and our aim is to bring forums and main site together.

Which brings me to my next point, we are looking for a few temporary (possibly permanent) staffers who are interested in updating the main site with various interesting community related articles. There aren't going to be any kind of weekly updates and it's a spontaneous kind of thing. Still, that doesn't mean we want people who are going to post one or two articles and then leave it at that. We want staffers who are genuinely interested in keeping the site updated and care for this community. Members who aren't selected for staff can still contact us admins or the staffers if they want their articles posted on the main site or have ideas to share.

Things we require from the staffers:
  • You need to know what's going on in the community and you need to have a good understanding of what people could find interesting or funny. This means that we need to know at least something about you so that we can trust you on this task. Of course you are allowed to like different things and we definitely want staffers with different personalities who can provide various kind of articles on many different subjects.
  • Decent English is something we absolutely require. The more interesting articles you can write, the better.
  • Willing to dedicate time for this. I don't know when GW6 is going to be finished and since it could take months, this site needs to be frequently updated. This doesn't mean you need to be posting news all the time and if you have a few busy days or even weeks and you can't do much work, that's fine, there are still other staffers helping you out. And you don't have to force yourself to make articles if nothing interesting is happening or you don't have any good ideas. Like I said, it's pretty spontaneous. We just don't want our staffers to stop posting articles after a week or two when the novelty wears off. That's all.
  • You are absolutely not allowed to post offensive articles or ridicule any of our members. This is a bit difficult one to explain but we trust that you know what's offensive and what's not, and if there happens to be some unclear situation, you can always contact the admins. For example, stuff like Amanda Landale Saga and I swallowed a small piece of aluminum foil would be okay to post since they aren't really that offensive (especially Amanda Landale Saga in retrospect). But pranks like that could get out of hand though so you really need to be able to use judgement with possible borderline cases.
Send your applications to DragonSlayer via private message. You can also contact me on IRC (#gamingw) if you want to talk about a staff position or have questions or anything of the sort but send an application as well. I'll be accepting applications even after the site is up (unless we already have enough staffers, we'll most likely get 5-6) so there's no definite date when I won't accept them anymore. When applying try to tell a bit about yourself, what forums you frequent and what kind of articles interest you the most. If you just want to generally write about everything, that's fine too. It's OPEN FORMAT so don't worry too much about that.

IMPORTANT:
We really want to cover everything what is going on in the whole community so we want people who can cover different forums and subjects. So even if you don't visit General forum or you don't know what's happening with the "core community", that's not a problem. We could still use your help!

IMPORTANT2:
The staffers we choose will not have full moderator rights. You do not get access to staff forum and you won't get a pretty blue name. However, you will be moved to a special staff group and made moderator on a community news forum which will be created after the site is up. This group will receive all the premium features so if you aren't a premium yet, there's that too. Note that premiums and moderators are also allowed to send their applications and they can also be chosen, just like anyone else.

Lastly, thanks to Drule for helping out with everything, he's also the one making the temporary site.

And feel free to post comments/suggestions/whatever here.
Last Edit: January 24, 2008, 03:49:52 pm by DragonSlayer
To Never Be Known Is The Worst Death
  • Avatar of Sarah
  • Blackman the Game: 0% complete
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Premium Member
  • Joined: Feb 7, 2004
  • Posts: 2401
Could you post what you want applications to entail?

Vaginal BARREL                                531 Gams Ave.
                                                      (281) 555-3935

Goals:
To become the very best game maker in the world. I want to help write articles for the main site because it will help people recognise my name mostly. That way I can become a world renowned gamemaker.

Volunteer work:
Making games
Making games for other

edit: you did it at the same time posted this. gg bb
  • Insane teacher
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Premium Member
  • Joined: Oct 8, 2002
  • Posts: 10515
Quote
You are absolutely not allowed to post offensive articles or ridicule any of our members. This is a bit difficult one to explain but we trust that you know what's offensive and what's not, and if there happens to be some unclear situation, you can always contact the admins. For example, stuff like Amanda Landale Saga and I swallowed a small piece of aluminum foil would be okay to post since they aren't really that offensive (especially Amanda Landale Saga in retrospect). But pranks like that could get out of hand though so you really need to be able to use judgement with possible borderline cases.

how about political opinions, prefaced with DOES NOT REPRESENT GW.
brian chemicals
  • Avatar of DS
  • DragonSlayer o_O
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Member
  • Joined: Jul 7, 2002
  • Posts: 2668
how about political opinions, prefaced with DOES NOT REPRESENT GW.
They are fine if it's made clear it doesn't represent the whole community's views and is just your own personal opinion. Plus this might increase discussion in political topics here on GW so yeah, something like this is also fine. Of course we can't allow just any kind of shit to be posted though.
To Never Be Known Is The Worst Death
  • Insane teacher
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Premium Member
  • Joined: Oct 8, 2002
  • Posts: 10515
premise: nigger is inherited from rats.
brian chemicals
  • Avatar of Sarah
  • Blackman the Game: 0% complete
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Premium Member
  • Joined: Feb 7, 2004
  • Posts: 2401
Speaking of SHIT, it should be obvious that we should keep cursing to a minimum (if any at all) in articles posted on the mainsite. Use tact!
  • Avatar of jamie
  • ruined former youth seeking atonement
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Premium Member
  • Joined: Jun 4, 2003
  • Posts: 3581
why be so tame? i guess i'm not arguing against being respectful, but why should it be obvious swearing should be kept to a minimum?
  • Insane teacher
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Premium Member
  • Joined: Oct 8, 2002
  • Posts: 10515
yeah uh I don't see anyone getting in an argument in an article since articles are one person alone, who gives a fuck if they say fuck.

it can be funny if someone says fuck for example:

Quote
I Am Legend is how the grassfuckers in Hollywood make a big-budget zombie movie: badly, by completely forgetting what makes them cool and instead squirting out a shitty, self-important bore. God damn, fucking morons; tooth-humping dullbats; crap-slurping horsenuts. The lot of them. Except the ones who make good shit. Where they could use their deep pockets to make a masterpiece of pant-shitting scariness they instead choose to puff themselves up like syphilitic peacocks. Fucking retards don't even try to sell the movie as a zombie flick. Instead, they bill it as a Will-Smith-Acts-Serious movie.

Smith is a boring-ass one-dimensional goodie-goodie fuckwit. He spends his days broadcasting on AM radio for any other people who might still be alive. What a dumbass. The only people he'll find that way are nutjob conspiracy theorists and the sort of illiterate white trash who think Bill O'Reilly has a fucking clue. When he's not broadcasting, Smith tries to find a cure that will turn the zombies back into people. He's got a swank lab in the basement of his fancy zombie-proofed house. He also spends an inordinate amount of time talking to mannequins, because, see, that's supposed makes him more human, alone and vulnerable.

these are good no swearing limits ~shepperd
brian chemicals
  • Avatar of Feldschlacht IV
  • The Notorious M.O.G.
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Premium Member
  • Joined: Nov 17, 2003
  • Posts: 1784
I suppose the no swearing rule is to maintain an aura of professionalism.
  • Avatar of Jester
  • FIFTY FIFTY FIFTY
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Premium Member
  • Joined: Jun 29, 2002
  • Posts: 3676
thats a really bad example of a PRO-SWEARING "article" because its pretty terrible

i wouldnt visit a site if that was the first thing i saw on it :(
  • Avatar of jamie
  • ruined former youth seeking atonement
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Premium Member
  • Joined: Jun 4, 2003
  • Posts: 3581
but the professionals are a bunch of self-important obnoxious pricks who are such slaves to money that they don't have the moral authority to judge anyone.

what i think is, yeah there should be a bit of quality control and of course articles which are just "haha fuckity fuck fuck" would be rejected on the basis that they suck, but not because the person used some strong language. sometimes swearing is good to get a point across and sometimes it can be pretty important in making something funny (whether or not that is a good thing is pretty much besides the point, the articles would just be to enjoy)

Quote
i wouldnt visit a site if that was the first thing i saw on it :(

as long as the articles are read over and someone sensible can make sure the person isn't just swearing because they don't have anything else to say, this kind of censorship is needlessly restrictive. if someone comes on and sees a shit, fuck, dick or two and are so affronted they start clicking the back button, then they are just pretty dumb and why should their stupidity be catered to? maybe i'm getting a bit dramatic, because it is just some entertainment for a gaming community but we should at least base the thing on some defensible principles.
  • Avatar of Sarah
  • Blackman the Game: 0% complete
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Premium Member
  • Joined: Feb 7, 2004
  • Posts: 2401
Some people are offended by swearing and no one is offended by NOT SWEARING therefore NOT SWEARING is better. And yeah, more professional. If I visited a website and saw FUCK SHIT FAGGOT FUCKS anywhere on the main page I'm pretty sure I'd leave. It makes the site seem 'dirty'.

edit: note I said KEPT TO A MINIMUM. I didn't say BAN SWEARING FROM THE SITE.
  • Avatar of ATARI
  • Lichens!
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Premium Member
  • Joined: Oct 26, 2002
  • Posts: 4136
Some people are offended by swearing and no one is offended by NOT SWEARING therefore NOT SWEARING is better. And yeah, more professional. If I visited a website and saw FUCK SHIT FAGGOT FUCKS anywhere on the main page I'm pretty sure I'd leave. It makes the site seem 'dirty'.

I don't remember there being a policy back when I worked on the staff about profanity being used in articles/reviews etc.  I just know that for the most part, they didn't have them, and that often if they did have profanity in them, they would get rejected from being put on the website unless they really had something spectacular to say.  (This was done through the user-submitted articles that were reviewed by members of the staff who then approved them and put them on the website).  I would mostly argue for a standard policy against the general use, or overuse of profanity, just for the sake of professionalism. 
  • Avatar of Bill Murray
  • :O~
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Premium Member
  • Joined: Aug 8, 2002
  • Posts: 1813
how about political opinions, prefaced with DOES NOT REPRESENT GW.

Why would you make an update about political opinion anyway?
youtube.com/teamhibbert
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Member
  • Joined: Feb 19, 2005
  • Posts: 1542
Why would you make an update about political opinion anyway?
It's not an update it's an article???
http://marklisanti.tumblr.com/post/126620624/i-can-totally-relate-harold-i-am-a-farmer-and-i
  • Insane teacher
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Premium Member
  • Joined: Oct 8, 2002
  • Posts: 10515
Some people are offended by swearing and no one is offended by NOT SWEARING therefore NOT SWEARING is better. And yeah, more professional. If I visited a website and saw FUCK SHIT FAGGOT FUCKS anywhere on the main page I'm pretty sure I'd leave. It makes the site seem 'dirty'.

as opposed to them coming on the forum and seeing the same thing and then not leaving?

dirty humor is the best fucking humor and you are both full of shit if you seriously say "I'D LEAVE IF THERE WERE TOO MANY SWEARS..." because I have seen you both type much worse (jester draws child porn) and my example was an extreme to prove a point, that swears can be really funny and I don't think you should preemptively set any kind of guidelines unless it becomes necessary.

It's not an update it's an article???

esh doesn't read good.

ps amateur game site has no standard of professionalism let alone a temp site that won't be in place very long guys!!!
brian chemicals
  • Avatar of Bill Murray
  • :O~
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Premium Member
  • Joined: Aug 8, 2002
  • Posts: 1813
It's not an update it's an article???
That still didn't answer my question.
youtube.com/teamhibbert
  • Insane teacher
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Premium Member
  • Joined: Oct 8, 2002
  • Posts: 10515
That still didn't answer my question.

because

this might increase discussion in political topics here on GW so yeah, something like this is also fine.
brian chemicals
  • Avatar of jamie
  • ruined former youth seeking atonement
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Premium Member
  • Joined: Jun 4, 2003
  • Posts: 3581
Some people are offended by swearing and no one is offended by NOT SWEARING therefore NOT SWEARING is better. And yeah, more professional. If I visited a website and saw FUCK SHIT FAGGOT FUCKS anywhere on the main page I'm pretty sure I'd leave. It makes the site seem 'dirty'.

edit: note I said KEPT TO A MINIMUM. I didn't say BAN SWEARING FROM THE SITE.

but this place is 'dirty'. if the articles are to be read by a community largely consisting of scathing and vulgar young folk i don't see why the content shouldn't reflect that in the interest of some false notion that this place is entertaining masses of delicate sophisticates. this is not some sort of mainstream video game journalism website (and those are all pieces of shit anyway). i don't think this kind of bias should come out of a vague delusion.

and you did suggest swearing should be kept out of articles entirely:
Quote
keep cursing to a minimum (if any at all)

we may not all be adults here but i think we all like to at least pretend that we are when it comes to this kind of thing, so i don't see why we should be protecting ourselves from anything.

Quote
If I visited a website and saw FUCK SHIT FAGGOT FUCKS anywhere on the main page I'm pretty sure I'd leave.

i don't think an article containing FUCK SHIT FAGGOT FUCKS would be accepted. i know you were exagerrating, but your point doesn't really work if you gave a realistic example, which might be, "this is not just bad: this is fucking awful." or something like that. i already said since there would be a quality check this kind of thing would be kept out as a matter of course anyway, so it's moot.

the staffers shouldn't be going in to every article thinking "all right i better keep this clean", and the checker/s shouldn't go in thinking "if i see a single curse oh boy".
  • Insane teacher
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Premium Member
  • Joined: Oct 8, 2002
  • Posts: 10515
swear limits: seven fucks allowed per staffer lifetime. exceeding fuck limit requires purchase of "fuck credits" which come in the form of premium memberships.
brian chemicals