Topic: If this doesn't scare you, it should... (Read 5804 times)

  • Avatar of Ash
  • Peasant
  • PipPip
  • Group: Premium Member
  • Joined: Jun 1, 2002
  • Posts: 229
Yahoo.com is apparently the most visited site on the internet.
Kids and old people are a very large demographic!
  • Avatar of dada
  • VILLAIN
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Administrator
  • Joined: Dec 27, 2002
  • Posts: 5538
Yahoo.com is apparently the most visited site on the internet.
Alexa isn't the most accurate source for this kind of information. I actually don't know the details that well but apparently it gets its data from the people who have the Alexa toolbar installed.
  • Avatar of UPRC
  • No, it doesn't stand for anything.
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Premium Member
  • Joined: May 25, 2002
  • Posts: 2974
Microsoft better keep their hands off my Yahoo. I love that search engine to bits, I don't want to see it corrupted.
  • Rocking!
  • Group: Member
  • Joined: Jul 5, 2005
  • Posts: 76
I thought Alexa just infected you with a tracking cookie whenever you visit their site, that tells them where you are going. That would explain why Yahoo is the "most visited site", because people who use Yahoo dont know how to clear cookies/install anti-spyware etc...
"Although its possible to live on figs, you soon wished you didn't"
  • Group: Member
  • Joined: Jul 17, 2007
  • Posts: 48
Nope.  It gathers its information from a toolbar that you consciously choose to install.
  • Avatar of dada
  • VILLAIN
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Administrator
  • Joined: Dec 27, 2002
  • Posts: 5538
I thought Alexa just infected you with a tracking cookie whenever you visit their site, that tells them where you are going.
No, that would be impossible to do with a cookie. This kind of software does exist, though, it's called spyware.
  • Insane teacher
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Premium Member
  • Joined: Oct 8, 2002
  • Posts: 10515
hahaha I can't believe people are like WHY SHOULD I CARE ABOUT MICROSOFT'S POSSIBLE MONOPOLY.

Look/Feel was such big news back in the day :(
brian chemicals
  • Avatar of Bujiro
  • GW Radio Manager
  • Pip
  • Group: Premium Member
  • Joined: Jun 14, 2002
  • Posts: 159
Why is every move Microsoft does construed as some sort of world conquering bid for power?  Google is just as powerful a corporation as Microsoft, but if it were google buying out Yahoo, no one would bat an eye.
because Google is trendy.

Look, honestly, i don't use Yahoo, at all, for a while, until they had commercials, i thought they were ago ready to collapse.  Microsoft is just doing a corporate motion, that's all.  they aren't some world dominator's, and even if they were, who cares, use google.
bahamut?
  • None of them knew they were robots.
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Premium Member
  • Joined: Nov 5, 2006
  • Posts: 3242
hahaha I can't believe people are like WHY SHOULD I CARE ABOUT MICROSOFT'S POSSIBLE MONOPOLY.

Look/Feel was such big news back in the day :(

Why is it that everyone says "LOL MICROSOFT MONOPOLY!"? What exactly is microsoft monopolizing? They're just a big company, they don't prevent others from doing what they want. Do they prevent anyone else from making operating systems? No, therefore they do not monopolize that.

I want just one example of a real monopoly by microsoft.
Play Raimond Ex (if you haven't already)


I'll not TAKE ANYTHING you write like this seriously because it looks dumb
  • Avatar of tuxedo marx
  • Fuckin' A.
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Premium Member
  • Joined: Oct 21, 2005
  • Posts: 4143
Yeah, Microsoft don't fit the economical definition of a monopoly, whatever accusations people make.
  • Avatar of dom
  • Chapter Four: The Imagination And Where It Leads
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Premium Member
  • Joined: Nov 9, 2003
  • Posts: 1022
Yeah, Microsoft don't fit the economical definition of a monopoly, whatever accusations people make.
Do you consider the economical definition of monopoly to be a useful definition?
  • Avatar of tuxedo marx
  • Fuckin' A.
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Premium Member
  • Joined: Oct 21, 2005
  • Posts: 4143
Do you consider the economical definition of monopoly to be a useful definition?
More useful than the alternative, "ugh stop trying to have a very successful business".
  • Insane teacher
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Premium Member
  • Joined: Oct 8, 2002
  • Posts: 10515
Why is it that everyone says "LOL MICROSOFT MONOPOLY!"? What exactly is microsoft monopolizing? They're just a big company, they don't prevent others from doing what they want. Do they prevent anyone else from making operating systems? No, therefore they do not monopolize that.

I want just one example of a real monopoly by microsoft.

you're so dumb

Yeah, Microsoft don't fit the economical definition of a monopoly, whatever accusations people make.

http://www.usdoj.gov/atr/cases/ms_index.htm
brian chemicals
  • Group: Member
  • Joined: Feb 6, 2008
  • Posts: 10
If Microsoft does the same thing to Yahoo mail that they did to hotmail, then it won't be long before pretty much everyone who doesn't use outlook express will be using gmail, because it is superior right now anyway. This is still playing right into Google's hands.
Microsoft Certification
  • Group: Member
  • Joined: Jul 17, 2007
  • Posts: 48
Rockman:
Depends on how you define "successful business".  If someone achieves dominance through competition and having a better product, that's true success in my book.  (Google's a prime example.)  But making your way to the top through a long string of broken laws and anticompetitive business practices, which has been Microsoft's way since they entered the operating system market if not longer (read up on the DOS licensing terms if you don't believe me) isn't successful business, it's successful thuggery.

Tina:
That may be so, but have you ever tried to switch from one email address to another?  Remember how much of a hassle it is to update it everywhere?  Look at all the websites that use your email address as your login name.  Multiply all that hassle by a few million.  Playing into Google's hands or not, it's a Very Bad Thing.
  • Avatar of Grogrog
  • Master of ALL the moogles!
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Premium Member
  • Joined: Dec 31, 2002
  • Posts: 330
It's actually not that difficult, at all, and has it's benefits. All you need to do is use both email accounts for a week or two max, and just update the email listings for things that are important. Half the time you don't even need to doit, as some websites your email doesn't matter, some websites you don't use anymore, etc. It gives you a chance to start over, use Gmail, and spam free (your new email shouldn't be on any mailing lists).
  • Avatar of EvilDemonCreature
  • i don't like change
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Premium Member
  • Joined: Jul 5, 2002
  • Posts: 1453
Rockman:
Depends on how you define "successful business".  If someone achieves dominance through competition and having a better product, that's true success in my book.  (Google's a prime example.)  But making your way to the top through a long string of broken laws and anticompetitive business practices, which has been Microsoft's way since they entered the operating system market if not longer (read up on the DOS licensing terms if you don't believe me) isn't successful business, it's successful thuggery.

Yah, this is generally why people hate Microsoft Micro$oft. When they make money, they have more power to do shit like this, which in turn usually makes them more money.

But looking at it that way, buying Yahoo has been just about the tamest thing they have done in a while. And it seems kinda silly to treat it the same as when they look for ways they can use the law to shit on the people those laws were meant to protect. I mean I can understand it pissing some people off for personal reasons, but it's not that big a fucking deal.

Hell, I still have 100 Gmail invites, so I can just throw them your way if you don't want your e-munications to be under the Microsoft banner.
  • Group: Member
  • Joined: Jul 17, 2007
  • Posts: 48
I've got a gmail account.  I got my invite from a friend who works at Google, way back when it was first launched.  I hardly ever use it, though, because I've got too much of my life invested in my @yahoo.com identity. :P
  • Avatar of Dale Gobbler
  • Meh.
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Premium Member
  • Joined: Dec 24, 2003
  • Posts: 2079
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/02/04/technology/04yahoo.html

Apparently Google is against Microsoft buying Yahoo.
m
ohap
  • Comrade!
  • Group: Member
  • Joined: Jun 9, 2004
  • Posts: 27
This isn't that big of a deal. If anything it's rather stupid, as many have said Microsoft is investing in a company that currently failing due to Google. So I don't understand how taking over Yahoo will hurt Google in anyway.

That being said, however, if anyone's gone used anything associated with MSN recently, including hotmail (or as it's known now, Windows Live Mail), they're currently screwing a lot of stuff up. I recently changed from hotmail to yahoo mail for that very reason. So when I see that they may take over yahoo mail, I get a little annoyed.
Just annoyed. Not scared, not pissed, just annoyed. It's just Microsoft performing another stupid business transaction. Not a big deal.


DM Development
-We're Pissing You Off: The Prequel 90%
--Story 100%
--Event Arc 100%
--Game Layout 98%
--Sidequests 45%
--Supplemental 15%
--Debugging 5%

www.shadowskyproductions.com