Attention 'Watchmen' movie... and videogame... (Read 29861 times)

  • Avatar of headphonics
  • sea of vodka
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Member
  • Joined: Dec 24, 2003
  • Posts: 6432
i mean i thought that's what it was, just some filter, but honestly it's probably more complicated than that.  this is what wiki says:

Quote
Post-production was handled by Montreal's Meteor Studios and Hybride Technologies filled in the bluescreen footage with more than 1500 visual effects shots. Visual effects supervisor Chris Watts and production designer Jim Bissell created a process dubbed "The Crush,"[12] which allowed the Meteor artists to manipulate the colors by increasing the contrast of light and dark. Certain sequences were desaturated and tinted to establish different moods. Ghislain St-Pierre, who led the team of artists, described the effect: "Everything looks realistic, but it has a kind of a gritty illustrative feel."[12][19] Various computer programs, including Maya, RenderMan and RealFlow, were used to create the "spraying blood."[20] The post-production lasted for a year and was handled by a total of ten special effects companies.[21]
  • Avatar of Feldschlacht IV
  • The Notorious M.O.G.
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Premium Member
  • Joined: Nov 17, 2003
  • Posts: 1784
:words:

ballandpaddle

Alright, so maybe I put my foot in my mouth when I said that movies shouldn't be judged in the same standard as books. And for the record, I did say I retracted my statement that 300 was an objectively good movie.

But damn, does something have to be a top notch, gold quality masterpiece for me to enjoy it? Can't something be objectively shit, but still enjoyable from a personal standpoint? So 300 may be a crappy movie objectively and cinematic fluff, but I still enjoy watching it. Where is the fault in that?
  • Avatar of headphonics
  • sea of vodka
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Member
  • Joined: Dec 24, 2003
  • Posts: 6432
there's no fault in it at all.  i don't care that you enjoyed it, enjoy whatever you want!  but you EXPLICITLY SAID that 300 was an awesome movie and you had no idea what we were talking about like it was some flawless movie and we had no reason not to like it.  this entire thing has just been an explanation, not me telling you what you should and shouldn't like.  everyone likes stupid shit.
  • Avatar of Feldschlacht IV
  • The Notorious M.O.G.
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Premium Member
  • Joined: Nov 17, 2003
  • Posts: 1784
You're right, and my apologies.
  • Avatar of Mongoloid
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Member
  • Joined: Apr 1, 2002
  • Posts: 1465
I dunno how you figure it's such a bad movie. It straight up ISNT a ripoff, that's the same fanboy bullshit that comes up with all movie adaptations. You are asking a little much if you expect a movie to come direct from the print, (ironic, in this case some of it did). ALSO, the diversions from the Greek mythology came from the book, and have nothing to do with the movie, which should be judged seperately, right? ps I did a search for Little Red Riding Hood, classic story right, DOZENS of movies come up, clearly all ripoffs, as they are not the events from the grimm brothers' version.
I can understand why you wouldn't LIKE the over-dramatizations with the dialogue and plot, but these things are also strengths, and whether they are good or bad is in direct relation to your opinion. The movie did very well in theatres and dvd sales, and has a very good rating pretty much everywhere you look.

but cool anyway dude, im glad thinking a movie was good makes me unintelligent. I'd like to hear what makes my opinions so terrible, and what makes yours so great. Seriously dude, you pick fights for fucking nothing.
  • Avatar of big ass skelly
  • Ò_Ó
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Premium Member
  • Joined: Oct 12, 2002
  • Posts: 4313
If you think 300 is anything but entertaining garbage then something's up. It wouldn't even be entertaining if you couldn't just switch your brain off for the SWEET VISUALS and shout the totally tubular catch-phrases with your amigos.
  • old skool
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Premium Member
  • Joined: Jan 7, 2003
  • Posts: 780
If you think 300 is anything but entertaining garbage then something's up. It wouldn't even be entertaining if you couldn't just switch your brain off for the SWEET VISUALS and shout the totally tubular catch-phrases with your amigos.

Pretty much this, I don't know anyone that went into 300 expecting anything else but to be able to turn their brain off and indulge in visuals and swords and yelling.
  • Avatar of Feldschlacht IV
  • The Notorious M.O.G.
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Premium Member
  • Joined: Nov 17, 2003
  • Posts: 1784
I don't think 'entertaining' and garbage should be used so freely in the same sentence, but they certainly aren't mutually exclusive.
  • Avatar of headphonics
  • sea of vodka
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Member
  • Joined: Dec 24, 2003
  • Posts: 6432
I dunno how you figure it's such a bad movie. It straight up ISNT a ripoff, that's the same fanboy bullshit that comes up with all movie adaptations. You are asking a little much if you expect a movie to come direct from the print, (ironic, in this case some of it did). ALSO, the diversions from the Greek mythology came from the book, and have nothing to do with the movie, which should be judged seperately, right? ps I did a search for Little Red Riding Hood, classic story right, DOZENS of movies come up, clearly all ripoffs, as they are not the events from the grimm brothers' version.
I can understand why you wouldn't LIKE the over-dramatizations with the dialogue and plot, but these things are also strengths, and whether they are good or bad is in direct relation to your opinion. The movie did very well in theatres and dvd sales, and has a very good rating pretty much everywhere you look.

but cool anyway dude, im glad thinking a movie was good makes me unintelligent. I'd like to hear what makes my opinions so terrible, and what makes yours so great. Seriously dude, you pick fights for fucking nothing.
so i shouldn't criticize the subject matter of a movie because it is based on a book?  how about i just criticize both?  300 the novel was kinda gay, too, but it was better than the film adaptation.  and dawg if you cannot recognize a middle of the road between COMPLETELY ACCURATE and PERSIANS WITH SWORD-ARMS then i don't know what to tell you.  also the difference between this and little red riding hood is that where it is MORE OR LESS fairly accurate and just omits a lot of shit for the sake of making it acceptable for seven year olds, this is a grossly inaccurate and overstylized bastardization that can't even hide behind the fact that it was only changed to be more fitting for children.  don't get me wrong, i think those disney adaptations are pretty lame, and i think kids can handle more than people give them credit for, but this is substantially worse than that.  it took way way way more liberties than those movies pretty much ever do.  compared to this, they seem pretty faithful to the original stories!  the problem with 300 isn't ONLY that it's inaccurate and just a really stupid adaptation; that's not even its MAIN problem.  it's just some cheesy action movie that nerds with no taste for whatever reason decided to espouse constantly.

also no sorry bud BAD MELODRAMA is not a strength; that's an objectively bad quality.  it's a negative unless USED SATIRICALLY i guess, and that clearly isn't the case here!  also i think you're unintelligent because you constantly post stuff that makes you come across like a pretty unsophisticated guy, for example using DVD SALES to judge a movie's quality.  get the hell out of here with that!  this is a pretty universal opinion on this board i have noticed, so!
Last Edit: July 31, 2008, 07:22:24 am by headphonics
  • Avatar of headphonics
  • sea of vodka
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Member
  • Joined: Dec 24, 2003
  • Posts: 6432
ps i didn't pick this fight, i just asked a question!  i would say if anyone picked it, it was mog.  but that's not to say i wouldn't have if he didn't, because i do enjoy being kind of a dick over stupid unimportant shit on the internet!
  • Avatar of Roman
  • Gameboy Advanced Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Premium Member
  • Joined: Apr 9, 2002
  • Posts: 1460
but cool anyway dude, im glad thinking a movie was good makes me unintelligent. I'd like to hear what makes my opinions so terrible, and what makes yours so great. Seriously dude, you pick fights for fucking nothing.

Quote from: Eric
1. Michael Bay
2. George Lucas
3. Jon Favreau
4. Zach Braff
5. Rob Reiner
  • Avatar of Feldschlacht IV
  • The Notorious M.O.G.
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Premium Member
  • Joined: Nov 17, 2003
  • Posts: 1784
Quote
i would say if anyone picked it, it was mog.

FUCK YEAH BABY
this is some schoolyard shit right here, who else is up for an ass whuppin. gonna steal your lunch money


In other news...

  • Avatar of headphonics
  • sea of vodka
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Member
  • Joined: Dec 24, 2003
  • Posts: 6432
ahahaha i forgot about that.  that was a pretty good ep considering the simpsons kind of sucks a lot now.
  • Avatar of Feldschlacht IV
  • The Notorious M.O.G.
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Premium Member
  • Joined: Nov 17, 2003
  • Posts: 1784
I dunno, I was doing some browsing, and the Watchmen movie might, might actually be pretty good. I'm still not sure, but it might be alright.
  • Avatar of headphonics
  • sea of vodka
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Member
  • Joined: Dec 24, 2003
  • Posts: 6432
uh i forgot i'd already had an argument in this thread until i looked on the last page and remembered.  weren't you saying that you'd read the book and that the trailer looked awesome???
  • Avatar of Feldschlacht IV
  • The Notorious M.O.G.
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Premium Member
  • Joined: Nov 17, 2003
  • Posts: 1784
I've also just said that I've looked around the internet for more information regarding the movie, and I've also just finished the book again.
  • Will you walk the realms of Chaos with me?
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Premium Member
  • Joined: Mar 20, 2006
  • Posts: 3525
hahahahaa that episode of the Simpsons was so good.

  • Avatar of headphonics
  • sea of vodka
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Member
  • Joined: Dec 24, 2003
  • Posts: 6432
I've also just said that I've looked around the internet for more information regarding the movie, and I've also just finished the book again.
it just seems kind of odd!  what did the internet tell you that you didn't get out of the trailer?  also idk i wouldn't have expected a second read through to be so illuminating if you got it the first time, especially since there's not even that much to get.
  • Avatar of Feldschlacht IV
  • The Notorious M.O.G.
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Premium Member
  • Joined: Nov 17, 2003
  • Posts: 1784
Quote
it just seems kind of odd!  what did the internet tell you that you didn't get out of the trailer?  also idk i wouldn't have expected a second read through to be so illuminating if you got it the first time, especially since there's not even that much to get.

I looked more on the production, the cast, the crew, shit like that. I did research. And yeah, I read Watchmen for the first time a really long time ago. It's pretty illuminating when the last time you read a book you were barely in high school, compared to a junior in college.
  • Avatar of EvilDemonCreature
  • i don't like change
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Premium Member
  • Joined: Jul 5, 2002
  • Posts: 1453
Why would you even joke about this

Would it have been better if I was speaking honestly?

But yeah, Matt Groening is a lot better at making jokes than I am.
Locked