It's like Edward Norton thinks everyone in the world has such a short attention span that they don't remember a movie that was made like 4 years ago.

The point is, Marvel wants to forget that movie was made, and replace that memory with this one, which should be slightly better.
Hulk is a potentially good character and has a dozen great story points to use. Letting Hulk's live action future end with Ang Lee's pile of shit would be a waste of creativity and money.

This movie will be good if not for the fact that it looks much more believable CG-wise, but also because it won't be in that retarded comicbook-screen-transition form. Ang Lee appears to be a pretty smart guy, he should've known that Hulk would be a bad movie.



Also I think Edward Norton will make a great Banner. He does lay on the thick Norton-esque dialogue, but he fits the profile of a nerdy scientist much better imho, that the mini-hulk Eric Bana did.

I don't see why everyone thinks it will be a bad movie. After all, you did only see like 10 seconds or less of the Hulk running down a street and thats it. I mean, I don't have high expectations, but I don't go around thinking it will suck after a short teaser.

Also, It can't possibly be worse than the last one and Edward Nortan is one of the better actors out there, so I think he will do the film justice, even though when I see him act all I see is 'Edward Nortan', and not the character at hand most of the time ​:(