Topic: Poor Posting Habits (Read 3073 times)

  • Avatar of hobo2
  • guns or swords?
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Premium Member
  • Joined: Jan 18, 2004
  • Posts: 1018
No, I was serious, penii isn't a word! Not trying to be witty or anything. I despise reading through a lot of non-sensible posts.
  • Journeyman Mage
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Member
  • Joined: Mar 23, 2005
  • Posts: 454
It would be pretty difficult to expect people to act like individuals on line, when so few of them can manage it in real life, though. At that point, one almost has to start making GW an exclusive club to keep the "riffraff" out (Hehe. "Riffraff." Language is so fun!)
Websites: Shiningbeam.net (Personal) | Bimini Road (Development Circle)
Releases:
  • Avatar of Borderline Academic
  • i need to fight tsg this isn't even optional
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Premium Member
  • Joined: Dec 8, 2002
  • Posts: 2164
Quote from: Shadowtext
It would be pretty difficult to expect people to act like individuals on line when so few of them can manage it in real life, though. At that point, one almost has to start making GW an exclusive club to keep the "riffraff" out (Hehe. "Riffraff." Language is so fun!)
Yeah, see, this would apply except there's already a clear group of PSUEDOELITES at GW and these are certainly NOT THEM.  Usually, they get referred to as the Targers, although that's certainly not true either.  Regardless, if this is an attempt to make GW exclusive, not only has that attempt been made already, but it's such a pathetic and easy one to mimic that it fails completely.  Like, you COULD say if Targ was a method to lock people out of a group (although it isn't, since very few people like targ enough for it to be a LOCKING MECHANISM), then it would work; it's hard for people to initially figure out SHOW ME YOUR BENSONS or whatever.But something like "oh man" and "hahahahaha, holy shit" is pretty easy to get into!
  • Avatar of reko
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Member
  • Joined: Jun 11, 2002
  • Posts: 883
Well, if people really want to post useless one liners, they can just as well as get on IRC. Sometimes few topics literally remind me of a chatroom more than a thread on forums, which it's not really supposed to do. It isn't realtime chat, you're supposed to put some thought into what you write.And remember, as mentioned in the announcement we aren't going to ENFORCE this really (we might mention it to some people who do it all the time, and we actually have, I've seen it on IRC), it's just that many people don't even ACKNOWLEDGE they are doing this. And hopefully after they read this they realise it's not that cool.And even though this topic isn't about the "This." thing, I have to mention this. Like already mentioned the idea behind quoting and agreeing with something like "This." might be in some occasions acceptable, such as in poll forum. But aside from that you aren't usually contributing much, or sometimes at all.For example say that there's a topic about some specific movie in general forum, first someone posts "I thought it was OK." Then someone else quotes that and says "This."I mean, sure, the movie being ok might be your opinion as well, but come on, you can at least tell what's good/bad about it. And that goes for almost any topic, usually the "This." replies quotes some relatively vague posts. I doubt that it almost ever summarizes that person's thoughts about the subject, honestly. And it isn't something that happens occassionally, that'd be fine, but you can go to almost any topic and see people doing it.And Wackfiend what the hell are you talking about?

big thanx to dragonslayer for sig!
  • Avatar of Hundley
  • professional disappointment
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Premium Member
  • Joined: Jun 24, 2002
  • Posts: 2426
Quote from: WackFiend
that doesn't mean that they are needed.  And as far as I know he hasn't suffered any reprocutions because of such posts.
teach me how to be pertinent wackfield :cry:  :cry:
  • Avatar of dada
  • VILLAIN
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Administrator
  • Joined: Dec 27, 2002
  • Posts: 5533
I'll give you more chance by fairly replying to what you've said.
Quote from: WackFiend
I think one of the things Azure was talking about was the aforementioned Hundley.  I constantly see him post nonsense posts and a lot of the times I find them quite funny, but that doesn't mean that they are needed.  And as far as I know, he hasn't suffered any reprocutions because of such posts.
So you admit that you find them funny, and yet they're somehow "unnecessary"? Do you think they harm the seriousness of this place? Of course, you can personally be serious about every topic in here, but that doesn't mean it's unwanted if someone brings humor into the atmosphere; and like he's said, it's not like he doesn't have it in him to take up a good (human-legible) argument sometimes. He actually usually does, cleverly hidden in humor. You can either see it or you can't.What I do know, however, is that punishing someone for making good posts that are sometimes simple beside the point isn't a good idea. The real bother are the people who, like stated in this topic over and over again, don't put in any effort at all. Hundley is actually very much beside the point in this discussion, and although it was wrong to call his name, I kind of thought that it would happen.
Quote from: WackFiend
Another good thing Azure brought up was the Mod/Admin attitudes.  A while ago I severely hated the way Steel got around doing pretty much anything he wanted doing some pretty stupid things that normal members would get warned/banned for.  Some of the mods even agreed with me (that whole "4 out of 5 moderators think Steel is an idiot" sig), but with Steel being a Mod there wasn't really anything to do.  For whatever reason, I haven't noticed Steel doing anything "unmodly" for quite some time now, nor any other mods, but in the past I can recall this being a big problem, just as Azure mentioned.
I'll leave alone your argument that Steel does "unmodly" things for now, and skip to what bothered me the most about this.So you say that "some of the mods" "even agreed" with the sig? And we're to believe that no-citation gossip quote? When you're trying to get a mod to change his attitude (which you're clearly trying to do, even if you state that you think he hasn't done anything wrong the past while) then you're going to have to come with a lot more than "some people agreed with me when I said this before". Even if you say that these "some people" are mods, this is still a completely empty argument. Furthermore, you state that these "some people" agreed with you, but how are we to know that they didn't just slightly see your point rather than agree, or even disagreed but joined in as a joke (by adding the image to their sig)?I know that taking apart your posts is probably a waste of my time, but I think it's important to note exactly what bothers me about each and every one of your posts: you don't think out your arguments to iron out the painfully obvious counter-arguments that are just waiting to be made, and you simply don't put in any effort to make yourself credible. I don't think I've ever seen you make a post that made me think "hmm, even though I don't agree with his opinion, he's got a good point there", and if you keep this up, I don't think you ever will.
  • Avatar of WackFiend
  • One Winged Angel
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Premium Member
  • Joined: Apr 21, 2004
  • Posts: 527
Quote
And Wackfiend what the hell are you talking about?
I was just saying I agreed with what Azure had said,  and gave some examples of what he was talking about.  Sure, I didn't refer to any of the mods going "[/quote] this", but it was still a problem plaguing GW because of the ways the mods acted.  Basically, yeah, GW has a lot of shit in it recently, but its not necessarily (though most often is) because of the newer/younger members.
  • aye ess dee eff el cay jay ache
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Premium Member
  • Joined: Jun 24, 2005
  • Posts: 5149
Quote from: Trystero
Yeah see, this would apply except there's already a clear group of PSUEDOELITES at GW and these are certainly NOT THEM.  Usually, they get referred to as the Targers, although that's certainly not true either.  Regardless, if this is an attempt to make GW exclusive, not only has that attempt been made already, but it's such a pathetic and easy one to mimic that it fails completely.  Like, you COULD say if Targ was a method to lock people out of a group (although it isn't, since very few people like targ enough for it to be a LOCKING MECHANISM), then it would work; it's hard for people to initially figure out SHOW ME YOUR BENSONS or whatever.But something like "oh man" and "hahahahaha, holy shit" is pretty easy to get into!
Barney_rubble95 asked "How do I become a big guy" or something similiar. Was he answered?Perhaps if the question was answered then more people would become big guys.
I USE Q'S INSTEQD OF Q'S
  • Avatar of LORd
  • SantaMan.EXE
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Premium Member
  • Joined: Jul 28, 2002
  • Posts: 1219
Wow. I am pretty confused now thanks to the several counterpoints provided in the recent posts, but I'm going to cleverly hide it by asking about how this all will effect Crap Shack, where you're not generally expected to post essays about how and why a given video is funny. Perhaps I am nitpicking but I suddenly felt a twinge of guilt because I've made my fair share of "ohman hahahahahahahaha" posts!!edit: as a side note though, i am intrigued as to how many people immediately recognize me by my posts alone 8)
  • huh?
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Premium Member
  • Joined: Sep 16, 2005
  • Posts: 432
so one-liners are a big No-No now? Is that what this is all about? Or am I just not reading everything correctly and need to seriously learn my English? Teach me you almighty mods. Teach me the ways of a good poster, so I can eventually reach my destiny of being a great poster of many words! No seriously, please answer my question.

  • Avatar of Jester
  • FIFTY FIFTY FIFTY
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Premium Member
  • Joined: Jun 29, 2002
  • Posts: 3676
Wait, we're angry because you cannot tell who posted something purely by reading the post? Oh come on, we have a billion fucking members, of course you can't tell! Ok, everyone pick a unique feature to add to your posts! I will be using:@~Jester~@
  • Avatar of dada
  • VILLAIN
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Administrator
  • Joined: Dec 27, 2002
  • Posts: 5533
Quote from: WackFiend
I was just saying I agreed with what Azure had said  and gave some examples of what he was talking about.  Sure, I didn't refer to any of the mods going "[//quote] this", but it was still a problem plaguing GW because of the ways the mods acted.  Basically, yeah, GW has a lot of shit in it recently, but its not necessarily (though most often is) because of the newer/younger members.
How the hell did you miss my post?
  • Avatar of Deonic
  • I HAVE AN AXE GWAHAHAHAHA
  • Group: Member
  • Joined: Jul 28, 2002
  • Posts: 4
Gamingw doesn't seem worse than a couple of years ago. Maybe its just because some of the moderators have been here a long time and so have got a "kids these days... don't know how to post..." attitude. When one is in their early teens one likes all that internet baffoonery.
I have a punctuation fetish. Punctuation makes me happy.


.
  • Avatar of DS
  • DragonSlayer o_O
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Member
  • Joined: Jul 7, 2002
  • Posts: 2668
Quote
But on the other side of the coin, I'm sure we don't want to become uber strict communist forum either. Of course I know this isn't what the mods are talking about at all, but I'm just trying to get across that this doesn't mean no more fun and games, it just means not every other post should be "gay imo".
Exactly. We don't want GW to become some very strict forum where nothing is allowed. We want to keep the old atmosphere and we will allow people to have fun and play around as long as it's actually funny or at least not just entirely shitty.
Quote
I think one of the things Azure was talking about was the aforementioned Hundley. I constantly see him post nonsense posts, and a lot of the times I find them quite funny, but that doesn't mean that they are needed. And as far as I know, he hasn't suffered any reprocutions because of such posts.
This topic is not about spamming or one-liners. It's about how members have no personality and they all post in a similar fashion to the point you can't tell difference between them. I can tell Hundley's posts apart from others. Like I just mentioned above, we don't want people to stop having fun. This topic is not about that at all.
Quote
Another good thing Azure brought up was the Mod/Admin attitudes. A while ago I severely hated the way Steel got around doing pretty much anything he wanted, doing some pretty stupid things that normal members would get warned/banned for. Some of the mods even agreed with me (that whole "4 out of 5 moderators think Steel is an idiot" sig), but with Steel being a Mod there wasn't really anything to do. For whatever reason, I haven't noticed Steel doing anything "unmodly" for quite some time now, nor any other mods, but in the past I can recall this being a big problem, just as Azure mentioned.
Jesus. There's nothing wrong with the attitudes of our moderating team. They are humans too and yes, they have done mistakes but this is not about that. Try to stay on topic. Thanks for pointing fingers though, you sure contributed!
Quote
I was just saying I agreed with what Azure had said, and gave some examples of what he was talking about. Sure, I didn't refer to any of the mods going "this", but it was still a problem plaguing GW because of the ways the mods acted. Basically, yeah, GW has a lot of shit in it recently, but its not necessarily (though most often is) because of the newer/younger members.
You don't get it AT ALL. Azure wasn't saying HAY MODERATORS HAVE ATTITUDE PROBLAMS THEY DONT DO THEIR JOB WELL. He was saying that moderators and some other popular members are also part of the problem on hand. The problem on hand. The problem we are talking in this topic. NOT what you are talking about. Let me say it one more time. NOT what you are talking about. Do you get it? Moderators are part of the problem because they have been doing this shit too. Or rather, they have been INSPIRATION because they are fairly popular members. It's true that moderators have been doing this stuff as well but that's not all of it. Even targers like Hundley who have personality could be root of this problem. Steel could be one. Rowain or I could also be one cause of this problem. Not because we jumped on the bandwagon, though. It's because we have posted one-liners, we have double posted and we have posted in the lower caps style. But we have been doing it for a long time, long before this problem got serious because everyone started doing it in the SAME WAY. It wasn't always like that. The fact that we have this problem now doesn't mean we posted in a similar way as most of the members who are doing it now or that we didn't have personality. That's why it wasn't a problem before.Man, let me say a good example. I still remember when I started the "imo" trend on IRC and forums just to see how long it'll take before people start to use it. And it didn't take long until people started to use it. Was it a problem when I was doing it? Not really. But when others started using it in a similar way, of course it became a problem because everyone was doing it. Before I started the whole "imo" thing, I told some people what I'm trying to test. rami probably remembers it. However, the difference between my example and the issue on hand is that the members who jumped on the bandwagon aren't even necessarily posting in a similar fashion as the members who might be more or less reason of the problem.
To Never Be Known Is The Worst Death
  • Avatar of Sludgelord
  • Who's the boss? Not you, bitch.
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Premium Member
  • Joined: Jan 28, 2004
  • Posts: 5571
Quote from: LORd
Wow. I am pretty confused now thanks to the several counterpoints provided in the recent posts but I'm going to cleverly hide it by asking about how this all will effect Crap Shack, where you're not generally expected to post essays about how and why a given video is funny. Perhaps I am nitpicking but I suddenly felt a twinge of guilt because I've made my fair share of "ohman hahahahahahahaha" posts!!edit: as a side note though, i am intrigued as to how many people immediately recognize me by my posts alone 8)
LORd, while this doesn't DIRECTLY apply to the Crap Shack, I am going to enforce it in part. Sometimes something deserves a good 'hahahaha' or a jesus christ' but when it and pretty stupid one liners like 'why dont you show me YOUR hotdog' (stupid example) are the majority of what you post in the Crap Shack, I may warn.The Crap Shack is not a fallout zone decaying from nuclear spam, it's a place where things that just aren't serious enough or just don't belong in General go. We're not STRICT about enforcing the rules but we want to keep the Crap Shack funny and we want to keep it decent. I don't want it to be the place where people go to spam up it up with witty one liners and shit posts like people seem to be doing now. If I get repeat offenders in a single topic, yeah, I'm going to warn.
Barkley, Shut Up and Jam: Gaiden
  • Avatar of reko
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Member
  • Joined: Jun 11, 2002
  • Posts: 883
Quote from: omigoddess
so one-liners are a big No-No now? Is that what this is all about? Or am I just not reading everything correctly and need to seriously learn my English? Teach me you almighty mods. Teach me the ways of a good poster so I can eventually reach my destiny of being a great poster of many words! No seriously, please answer my question.
It's not the one liners. It's the CONTENT of those one liners. Just take a look into the page one for examples.

big thanx to dragonslayer for sig!
  • Avatar of ReloadXPsi
  • im in a wrld of tri4ce
  • PipPip
  • Group: Member
  • Joined: Jul 4, 2002
  • Posts: 268
Quote from: Hundley
also i am a pretty awful poster but you guys know you'd miss me :words:  :words:  :words:  :iceburn:
Indeed.Shit, I'm displaying MY bad habit right here.(And then conveniently, no "Edited by" line appears. Fuck.)
http://www.angelfire.com/rpg/supponibarodu/
Yeah so SpoonyBard eventually did a new Final Fallacy game.
  • Avatar of Borderline Academic
  • i need to fight tsg this isn't even optional
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Premium Member
  • Joined: Dec 8, 2002
  • Posts: 2164
Quote from: Jester
Wait we're angry because you cannot tell who posted something purely by reading the post? Oh come on, we have a billion fucking members, of course you can't tell! Ok, everyone pick a unique feature to add to your posts! I will be using:@~Jester~@
...if this is to me, first of all, why did you not bring this up in the topic in the mod forum, when, you know, WE WERE ALL DISCUSSING IT.secondly, it is not because I cannot tell people solely from their posts, but the fact that this happens in SUCCESSION so many times we might as well have ONE MEMBER running around making quadruple posts in topics that are all like this.it's a complete lack of identity combined with a disturbing urge to post things with a lack of identity.  hell, I used you as an example of someone who posts in a similar style and STILL you can tell who it is and it's STILL more than just "holy shit" or "this is gay".it goes beyond one liners, double posting, or even WITTY COMMENT.  it's this mass identity that many people on GW, from admins to members, seem to want to propigate, and while this would be fine if it wasn't INCREDIBLY BORING AND IRRITATING, I (and of course the many others that posted in the topic asdoaina JESTER) would have no problem with it.and yeah, I was actually afraid someone would bring up SIGNATURE MOVES as an argument, even though you are joking!ending a post with "<3" or "pilt!" does not make you really that unique (or for that matter, "`" instead of " ' " which is just IRRITATING), it just makes you kind of an idiot!the problem here is the CONTENT of the lines being posted.  hell, one liners and WIT are funny, if they are not always the same thing being posted by someone else.  the Christmas topic has MANY examples of this, and not just from leafo.  it's just plain irritating and so yeah, STOP IT YOU GAYBERS.
  • Avatar of Hundley
  • professional disappointment
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Premium Member
  • Joined: Jun 24, 2002
  • Posts: 2426
Quote from: Trystero
we might as well have ONE MEMBER running around making quadruple posts in topics that are all like this.
i nominate myself for this job i need something to do at work :( better to have me do this then generic face of the masses mr. i likel kingdom hearts?????
  • OK Computer
  • PipPip
  • Group: Premium Member
  • Joined: Mar 23, 2005
  • Posts: 201
It strikes me that a lot of people have no personality anyway so you wouldn't be able to tell their posts from someone elses whether they wrote ten paragraphs or ten words. It seems irrelevant.To me it seems the drive behind this is not about INDIVIDUALITY at all but just to avoid a forum filled with:"what do you think of this?""gay imo""lol""great topic fucktard""stop fucking flaming FFS""hahahaha"etc.Which is fine by me, but don't pretend your trying to foster individuality.


Franklin the Freedom Mouse says: If you really want to make the world a better place, join the fight against international communism!

Buck Fush!!! it is his fault i am a retard
Locked