Well, these aren't just eggs, they are soon-to-be-grown peoples. If it were just the egg, I'd not have a problem with it. Sperm + egg = human life just like flour + water = paste.
Flour != paste.
water != paste.
Flour + water = paste.
Right.sperm + egg = fertilised egg.
fertilised egg + gestation = baby.
sperm + egg != baby.
Every single sperm has the chance to become a full-fledged human being. Heck, every single bacterium has the chance to become a galaxy-spanning civilisation. But until they get those chances, potential and actual
are not the same. Nobody cries for menstrual blood. Nobody cries for the millions of sperm that do not make it to the egg. Nobody cries for the skin cell that could be made into a clone.
The fertilised eggs that are used in stem cell research are not going to be human beings, or even babies,
ever, regardless of whether or not you can save lives with them. Left-over fertilised eggs of IV are left-over because they
didn't have a chance in the first place. Could you at least
do some research before making up your mind about something you have nothing to do with?
Letting people die out of some misplaced sense of moral superiority is not going to make these eggs into people, and you're
insane for thinking it will.
Are you going to
force women into pregnancies because you yourself
feel bad about wasting eggs? Are you
yourself going to preserve
every single sperm you produce? If you answer "No, of course not, just those eggs we could manage" you are a horrible human being for thinking you have some sort of authority over which eggs is worth letting live and which isn't, and I'm going to call you a eugenicist and a megalomaniac. I don't have to tell you how I'd think about you if you answer "yes" to these questions.