Politics The Militia movement and the New World Order (Read 1134 times)

  • Avatar of Kaworu
  • kaworu*Sigh*Isnt he the cutest person ever
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Premium Member
  • Joined: Oct 12, 2002
  • Posts: 5755
Ok so I was watching a Louie theroux thing last night from the 90's where he stayed with some "Patriots" and I found it interesting. Essentially these are people who believe that the New World order (UN) are infringing on the constitution of the united states, and so they've moved up to the mountains to live self sufficiently, avoid paying taxes, whatever in the hope that the NWO will leave them alone. A place (or places) where they can live their own lives, however when the time comes, everybody in the communes must bare arms to defend against the military. Fuck one of them had the same backstory as Cobra Commander!
This means of course that it's something of a breeding ground for right-wing crazies, racists and gun nuts. Essentially Paulsies. But there are different groups. You have the white supremists who the main group try to stay away from, the constitutional militias, the christian patriots etc. There's also the cult side such as Branch Davidian (Waco).

It's really interesting to me that people will do this, living in England there's a general attitude of not caring too much about anything, but in America there seems to be paranoid crazies who will get up and leave over just about anything big or small. I even hear that they believe guns are important to them as Tea is to us... so WHOAH!

How can anyone think a weapon is that important? :fogetmmh:

Well, there's a lot of americans here who'd possibly maybe know more about this could fill me in? Any cool documentaries to watch about these guys? Better yet anybody here who actually agrees with them in some way?

(Also I know about that Jonestown stuff, that was truely horrifying/disgusting)
Last Edit: July 23, 2008, 11:04:56 am by The Octave Doctor
  • Avatar of Marcus
  • THE FAT ONE
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Premium Member
  • Joined: Sep 28, 2002
  • Posts: 2690
The New World Order is a conspiracy theory and these people are just paranoid and confused giving how rapidly government policies change.  As far as I'm concerned they're freeloading illegals since they're stirring trouble and not paying taxes but there's nothing you can do about them outside of shooting them and that's a bit extreme.

I did see this one documentary about a bunch of guys who tried to get Texas to secede from the government in the 90s.  I forgot what it was called but it's kind of interesting to note that it was a fairly large group of people.
 
  • Avatar of Kaworu
  • kaworu*Sigh*Isnt he the cutest person ever
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Premium Member
  • Joined: Oct 12, 2002
  • Posts: 5755
the New World Order is a pretty unconvincing conspiracy theory. Governments can't even control sex scandals leaking in the media, so the idea that they all secretly work for some group of superleaders (The Bilderberg group seem to be one of the most popular possible groups of "real" world leaders among whackos) is just unplausable.

Where's KK4 when you need him?
Last Edit: July 23, 2008, 01:14:18 pm by The Octave Doctor
  • Avatar of kentona
  • even more eviler than Skeletor
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Premium Member
  • Joined: Apr 14, 2005
  • Posts: 1240
Where did you hear about the Cobra Commander backstory story?  I want to know more!

..:: Full game is released.  Download it now! ::..
  • Avatar of Bled
  • Forever into Nowhere
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Premium Member
  • Joined: Dec 15, 2002
  • Posts: 514
Although the right to carry a weapon is something that a lot of people take seriously in the United States, I think problems like so-called "constitutional" militias and extremist groups are a bi-product of our government's use of fear tactics to manipulate the general populace.  Ever since the threat of nuclear war came to the forefront of national consciousness during the Cold War there has been a growing sense of reliance upon the government to keep its people safe from every feasible threat, which is exactly the type of fantastical ideal that a lot of Americans will embrace without a second thought.

Citizens of the United States place importance upon the ability to protect themselves, but they put the most important responsibilities in the hands of the people in power.  Our government is supposed to be orderly, knowledgeable, powerful, and fully capable of defending itself and its citizens under any and all circumstances.  When the people in our government fail (as they usually do) or the idea that they are even somewhat influenced by outside sources becomes prevalent then there is a tendency for dissident groups of wackos to run to the hills and prepare for armageddon.

If you're concerned about inalienable rights such as privacy, liberty and safety then the United States is not exactly the most comfortable place to be living right now.  The current administration has a new form of propaganda at their disposal with the dastardly threat of TERRISM, and after 9/11 there are a lot of people out there who really will go home and affix plastic over their windows with duct tape just because the White House says so.  The administration is wielding this power like an unruly child and as a result people are losing faith in the governmental powers that be and the basic idea that we are safe and happy in our capitalistic little haven.

Basically the people that make up these extremist groups came to rely a bit too heavily on the government to provide them with protection and freedom and it failed them.  They've taken it into their own hands to live up to their malformed concept of what living in the United States should be like and they're preaching it to whoever will listen and follow.  They're paranoid and idealistic, but the scary part is that they have guns in their hands and they think that they know what's right.  Their weapons represent the power that the government has either taken away from them or thrown away altogether by practicing diplomacy with other nations. 

I guess it would be a bit hard to understand for someone who doesn't live here, but these little militant groups hardly ever pose a tangible threat to anyone but themselves.  If they want to carve out a peaceful little existence on the side of a mountain somewhere and leave everyone alone then more power to them.  If they try to fuck with society in any way then the government will burn them to the ground and all of us normal citizens will watch the documentary on the Discovery channel.

I would recommend Bowling for Columbine, which is one of Michael Moore's early documentaries, if you want to get a bit more insight into the role that guns play in our culture and just how wacky some people get over them.
For every moment of triumph, for every instance of beauty, many souls must be trampled.
Hunter S. Thompson
  • Avatar of kentona
  • even more eviler than Skeletor
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Premium Member
  • Joined: Apr 14, 2005
  • Posts: 1240
I read that for every 100 people in the US, there are 90 guns.

Here it is: http://www.reuters.com/article/topNews/idUSL2834893820070828

This is outside law enforcement and military.

..:: Full game is released.  Download it now! ::..
  • Abominationist
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Member
  • Joined: Jun 28, 2008
  • Posts: 772
I find it ironic how the citizens rely on the Government to secure their safety and land when the orignal idea behind securing ones freedoms, rights, and land would be in the hands of the very citizens themselves when the U.S. originally formed. More specifically the local militia, which is comprised of the people whom live on their own land.

Ah well the times change and theres extremists no matter where you go, except these ones isolated themselves and have guns. An equation with a pretty not so great out come.
A tool is a tool regardless. I mean if you suck, you suck, and not even the most perfect tool could save you. And if your damn good then even with the worst tool ever conceived you could chug out some high quality shit.
  • Avatar of Kaworu
  • kaworu*Sigh*Isnt he the cutest person ever
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Premium Member
  • Joined: Oct 12, 2002
  • Posts: 5755
Yeah one of them had his business destroyed and his family damaged by the taxes so on that alone he moved up to the mountains to fight the US Government.. Which is a major overreaction to me, I don't know how you guys'd see it.

The land is basically the government's, so by living there and refusing to pay taxes/whatever, aren't they just provocing them?
  • Avatar of Bled
  • Forever into Nowhere
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Premium Member
  • Joined: Dec 15, 2002
  • Posts: 514
Quote
I find it ironic how the citizens rely on the Government to secure their safety and land when the orignal idea behind securing ones freedoms, rights, and land would be in the hands of the very citizens themselves when the U.S. originally formed.

Yeah dude, but that was back in the day when it actually made a difference to a lot of people if you held a gun in your hand.  When the United States was initially formed both the people who fought for the government and the people who fought for themselves were on a level technological field.  Today the government possesses weapons so deadly that only a government could possess them and it is the citizen's role to rely on the government to wield the power responsibly.  The only part that Americans seem to forget about as a society is that it is also the responsibility of the people to revolt if the government is abusing its power.

Quote
Yeah one of them had his business destroyed and his family damaged by the taxes so on that alone he moved up to the mountains to fight the US Government.. Which is a major overreaction to me, I don't know how you guys'd see it.

Some people want to be some sort of patriotic hero and fight for what they believe in even if does only make them just another zealot in a small and completely insubstantial group of fuckwits.  Personally, I'm just staying here long enough to get my college degree and then I'm moving to Canada. 
For every moment of triumph, for every instance of beauty, many souls must be trampled.
Hunter S. Thompson
  • Avatar of Marcus
  • THE FAT ONE
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Premium Member
  • Joined: Sep 28, 2002
  • Posts: 2690
I read that for every 100 people in the US, there are 90 guns.

Here it is: http://www.reuters.com/article/topNews/idUSL2834893820070828

This is outside law enforcement and military.

guns are fucking awesome and there's nothing wrong with this.  i go to the range with my buddies every weekend and shoot 1,000 rounds it's awesome and relaxing.  we also started a skeet shooting club to work on our marksmanship.

where's the statistic that points out that for every whackadoo psycho with a gun there's 30 responsible and trained individuals who know how to use one properly?
  • Avatar of headphonics
  • sea of vodka
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Member
  • Joined: Dec 24, 2003
  • Posts: 6432
Quote
guns are fucking awesome
ahahah marcus what a guy you are
  • Avatar of ase
  • It's A Short Eternity... live with it
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Premium Member
  • Joined: May 23, 2003
  • Posts: 4526
ahahah marcus what a guy you are
b.....be careful what you say!!!!

he's a black guy with a gun!!!!
  • Avatar of Sludgelord
  • Who's the boss? Not you, bitch.
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Premium Member
  • Joined: Jan 28, 2004
  • Posts: 5571
dude, marcus has killed a guy.
Barkley, Shut Up and Jam: Gaiden
  • Avatar of Kaworu
  • kaworu*Sigh*Isnt he the cutest person ever
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Premium Member
  • Joined: Oct 12, 2002
  • Posts: 5755
I can't see the responsible person arguement (a responsible person wouldn't have a gun, in my opinion). I don't really think people should be allowed to have guns, and that people who promote them as the ideal of american freedom need to realise that America gained independence like 230 years ago or something, and that certain principles that worked back then can no llonger apply to modern society. The fact that some people believe their entire country/culture is based around the prospect of violent revolution seems absurd.
  • Abominationist
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Member
  • Joined: Jun 28, 2008
  • Posts: 772
Actually those who view guns as their god given right are luckily in the minority. And believe it or not the prospect of the average citizen keeping a gun concealed on their person and may use it upon self defense keeps alot of would be criminals from breaking the law.

Take away guns and you'll increase the crimes by them, because the ones that actually use them the wrong way will get their hands on them regardless.
A tool is a tool regardless. I mean if you suck, you suck, and not even the most perfect tool could save you. And if your damn good then even with the worst tool ever conceived you could chug out some high quality shit.
  • Avatar of Kaworu
  • kaworu*Sigh*Isnt he the cutest person ever
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Premium Member
  • Joined: Oct 12, 2002
  • Posts: 5755
That arguement has been shot to pieces so many times already, but basically countries with gun bans suffer less guncrime than America. Legal stores make guns more avaliable to the people, people who would not normally have guns, can obtain them with little hassle. Plus the old schoolshootout point, The school massacres would never happen if the guns weren't so easily obtained.
  • Avatar of datamanc3r
  • The Irrepressible
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Member
  • Joined: Nov 24, 2004
  • Posts: 938
Nice point, but that depends on how effectively we could keep sick people like Seung-Hui Cho away from guns. While taking guns away from the general populace will lower crime, how could we make sure that regular gang members (and idiots) don't get them anyway? The measures taken would have to be very strict and costly, not to mention that all the sudden there will be a black market for shipping guns. Taking guns away would result in something like the alcohol prohibition of the 1920's -- people could still get guns, and people will be far more inclined to break the law in rebellion (unless, god forbid, we are actually MATURE enough to think otherwise).

In response to your schoolshootout argument, what's to stop the next kid from strapping explosives to his chest and blowing up the school library? Crazy people will still find crazy ways to kill. Taking guns away, and taking away the possible deterrence factor, does not help.

Also, correlation is not causation. While other countries with gun bans may have lower crime than America, there are other factors that should be included such as the social mindset towards violence (videogames, videogames, videogames) as well as violence integral to the social structure (gangs, etc.).
"I would be totally embarassed to write this, even as a fakepost. it's not funny except in how you seem to think it's good. look at all the redundancies, for fuck's sake. "insipid semantics, despicable mediocrity" ugh gross gross. I want to take a shower every time I read your prose." -Steel
  • Avatar of Kaworu
  • kaworu*Sigh*Isnt he the cutest person ever
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Premium Member
  • Joined: Oct 12, 2002
  • Posts: 5755
I don't think there would be some major prohibition trouble like with alcohol, because the only people who'd want to own guns in that sense are kinda pathetic. Alcohol is a very different thing because it isn't a weapon, and people use it for such a variety of reasons that to get rid of it is kinda stupid. Guns only exist for one reason, to hurt/kill, there wouldn't be anything like a public uproar (well there shouldn't be, but there are lots of idiots around)
Most countries have gang problems. Most countries have crazy people. Not having guns readily avaliable in street shops means they have to use more close/personal methods generally, it makes them easier to catch. Deterrence? these events aren't exactly common enough for a large number of households to have guns, or any. The police and justice system should be deterrent enough.
Correlation is not causation, but you can't ignore very obvious connections.
  • Abominationist
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Member
  • Joined: Jun 28, 2008
  • Posts: 772
Actually any weapon that was made was made for the same reason everyother weapon was made.

The Alchohol prohibition can be compared to taking everyones guns away, since alchohol is an important part of U.S. society thats what happened, same thing for guns. Although idiots making poison and killing themselves because they don't know what the hell they're doing is the same for idiots making guns from enternet blue prints and atempts at making gun powder and blowing themselves up because they don't know the proper amounts or how to make it is the same. Different things, same results.

And it isn't easier to catch them without legal means, it's actually harder because getting the guns would be more under the table and slip through any registration required. Plus the police budget and manpower isn't exactly great.
A tool is a tool regardless. I mean if you suck, you suck, and not even the most perfect tool could save you. And if your damn good then even with the worst tool ever conceived you could chug out some high quality shit.
  • I fear and I tremble
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Premium Member
  • Joined: Aug 21, 2005
  • Posts: 6165
Oh my bad, I thought that this
Quote
Although idiots making poison and killing themselves
was in reference to the consumption of alcohol and thought you were saying alcohol is a POISON THAT KILLS and I got pretty offended....


I hearby remove my remark and apologize for my brash and belligerent behavior
Last Edit: July 27, 2008, 02:38:12 am by Harry Manback
DEUCE: MEETING THE URINE UP CLOSE AND PERSONAL AND REALIZING IT'S JUST LIKE ME AND MY PREJUDICES  THIS WHOLE TIME WERE COMPLETELY FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF PTTTTHTHTHH GOD IT'S EVERYWHERE<br />DEUCE: FUCK THIS TASTES LIKE PISS<br />PANTS: WHERE IT SHOULD TASTE LIKE COTTON CANDY OR PICKLES<br />DEUCE: OR AT LEAST LIKE URINE NOT PISS