no one actually agrees, it's earl cnips|couchfiend|headphonics|afura
Actually the genius of some paintings may very well lie in the brush strokes. Subtlety is pretty intense man.
The overall picture IS the most important thing, but a picture is the sum of its parts. Understanding the subtleties of a piece of music or a painting can compleeetely change its meaning for you.
You are right though that none of it is musician exclusive. I think though that being a musician you generally spend a lot more time listening to music than non musicians (not EVERYBODY but it makes sense to me that it would be true in most cases?), so you'd have a wider knowledgebase of the artform maybe?
no no I concede, of course the subtlety of the brush strokes matter. ~a stroke can make a painting~ or some shit like that, but it still has to come together to make something to really mean something, ie the final aural aesthetic in the case of music.
I still think you can appreciate the subtleties of music without playing an instrument. you won't appreciate it from an EMPATHETIC viewpoint (where the 'bias' I mentioned before would come from), but you can still appreciate it fully. a lot of it is knowing where to look, or how to look at it. being a musician would definitely goad you into that sort of thinking though.
as for that last thing I posted about being ignorant of the technical stuff, I dunno if I agree with that or not. to really discuss that you'd probably have to get into how music is supposed to be listened to, and I'm not really sure anybody in the world could do that adequately
unexpectedly cool topic though, at lot better than Band Knowledge Showcase!! which admittedly is the best a music forum can get on a regular basis.