No shit where da money at

where da g-money

No, never.
I cane play the finalz fintasy on the gowe.(I just dun know why they haven't ported ff7 tho <3 klowd)

Seriously though, I don't think they should stop because there are a couple of games I missed because I'm not exactly an rpg finatic. Though, I enjoy a good classic styled rpg every now and then. Anything past FF6 is no man's land though.

i like the remakes.  dragon quest 4-6 and final fantasy 3/4ds are fine because they're new.

what i don't like is paying full price for a poorly emulated rom.  squenix has the audacity to charge not 30$ but 40 DUCATS for their new ds games as if the quality is waaaaay above everyone else.  blizzard does the same fucking thing with their games; the average new game price for a pc game is 40$ but even back in 1997 blizzard was charging 60$ new for their pc games.  these guys are ripping us off but people buy it anyway because hey it's final fantasy and ff is popular

The pricing is pretty ridiculous.
As long as they port games that were not been released in certain countries(some DQ games, Star Ocean 1, etc), it's okay. I might have been fine with CT getting a port if they actually added things, but nope. Most of their old ports sucked, but the new ones they're cranking out(other than CT) are good.

Square Enix needs to lock themselves in a room with nothing but copies of Parasite Eve, Brave Fence Musashi, and Einhander and not be allowed to leave until they figure out the right answer.

how can you tell the difference between their ports and their new games anyway????

They're definitely going overboard with the ports/remakes, especially where FFIV is concerned. It wasn't a bad game, but it definitely doesn't deserve the massive number of ports it has.

For me to want them to produce new games, I'd have to have confidence in their ability to identify and understand exactly what it is that made their older games great in the first place.

On that merit, I'm pretty sure it's better for everyone that they just keep making ports.

In that case, at least there's the hope that some new generation of gamer will have access to one of those classic games and maybe be able to identify what makes it so great. It's at least better than him drawing "inspiration" from the latest peice of shit title from a comany that doesn't know what the fuck it's doing.

Hell, all that "new" title did anyways was look at one of those older games and copied everything that that game did wrong.

Where did you get that from? If you discount indie games that is completely wrong

It has been for as far as I can remember.  I just bought King's Bounty yesterday which is published by Atari and it was only 40usd.  The Witcher Enhanced contains two professionally made stand alone quests with about 15 hours of gameplay each (that's a whole game right there) plus a whole shitload of extras for 40usd.  Collected editions of games like Gold/Platinum/whatever go for 30-40usd depending on how old the original title is (When Civilization 4 warlords came out they instantly released a collected edition for 40$ even though civ4 was 40$ and warlords was 30$).  Most of the pc games I have I bought new 40usd and only the BIG NAME TITLES (as in stuff that's a multiconsole release like Oblivion, Fallout 3, and Spore) are 50usd.  Even Crysis and Clear Sky, which are stand alone games, are 30-40 bucks.  Why the fuck are console games an extra 10$?  It's not like they have better packaging or they're harder to distribute.

Some ports are fine, IMO. Specially when they really improve the game, like FF3/FF4 for the DS. Or ports of games that weren't released outside japan. That's nice.

But some ports are so... meh, like CT.

FAGGOTS.

All of you shouldn't be complaining at all. The constant ports Square-Enix is releasing is obviously being used to fuel the heated development costs of Final Fantasy XIII and it's spin offs.