Yeah, I like to go to GameFAQs and read one good review (9 or 10), one average review (6-8) and one terrible review (1-5) just to get a balanced opinion. As long as the reasons people give aren't stuff like "graphics are not as good as crysis" or "i do not understand story why kill bowser???", generally the reviews there are fairly good.
On the topic of Fallout 3, though, I'm interested in how VATS turns out. It'll only be good (read: useful) if some fights are too difficult for regular FPS players to beat. If it's not balanced, then it'll be pretty useless. On another note, I hope they make the difficulty reasonably hard, like its predecessors. I liked the fact that Fallout 1 and 2 were actually a challenge, and if they make it as difficult as other RPGs that have come out in the last few years (fable, KotoR), I shall be bitterly disappointed.
Upon arriving the attending doctor could find no abnormal physical symptoms other than extremely dilated pupils. After spending several hours terrified that his body had been possessed by a demon, that his next door neighbor was a witch, and that his furniture was threatening him, Dr. Hofmann feared he had become completely insane.