I always thought it was because watermelon was just popular in the south with everyone but for some reason just became associated with a stereotype. Maybe when people moved north?

hahaha why can't a black guy have some fricking KFC and watermelon without someone getting racist? Geez.

altho juris you are on debate team and you know that is a really weird fucking comparison.

in debate it's a satire. it's supposed to downplay the idea that eating meat promotes torture, and the comic mischief was pretty much intended (read: I know it's retarded, but it's true).

God, why am I even fighting for the chicken eaters? I don't even like the taste of chicken. 

Thats actually valid if you both wear a condom.

i heard the reason why black people are associated with watermelons is because watermelons were known to grow in the middle of cotton fields in the south, so they would find them while they were picking cotton and it would be a nice lil treat from god or whatever

is this true

we call it the manna of the south in these parts.

hmm as unsettling as it sounds (cause I as you guys, grew up in a culture where we treat dogs as man's best friend), if there is a want for dog meat to be prepared and sold in restaurants/stores, then I have no problem with legalization. I have seen much worse animals/body parts sold for consumption (cow hearts? pig tongues?). Heck I sometimes eat a Polish sausage called kaszanka which is just pig's blood and buckwheat grain. So other then the ewww factor, and how our culture represents dogs, is what really keeps something like that legalized. HOWEVER, the torture of ANY animal (dog, cow, chicken) like described in that movie (link down), even if it will be used for food, should be prohibited. Don't we already regulate that for cow, swine, and poultry slaughter? And I don't believe that BS that it "makes the meat tastier". Aren't endorphins usually situated in the brain?

btw, I myself however wouldn't try it, unless maybe if someone dared me.