LOL that whole post is spot on, I agree with everything you say. Re: Aphex Twin I don't know specifically, but breakcore and idm in general seems like it has a lot of furry / weird sex stuff fans? E.g. Renard is a fox furry... Renard means FOX... I don't listen to Renard but I hear dopes recommending him in youtube comments etc. I think, not because idm perverts you, but if you're into media that's outre and web-based, you will statistically start to run into more inventive music and idm artist/style communities will see a benefit from that boost. I'm just repeating myself from my post earlier about black queers -> more likely to coincide on venn diagram with furries -> the "i like 'gross'" animals and bugs sphere.
With religion ofc, who knows what precisely caused each at their inception but every one needs a certain base strata of humans to get popular, right? Like how life or a forest fire starts, it needs a certain situation with gunpowder and a catalyst, and all the world religions had and have, some specific ratio, or group of ratios, of multiple humans who are going out and spreading this idea, or fighting against it and legitimizing its martyrdom, and either of these could easily be fueled by doing drugs / or being crazy - which go hand in hand a lot for many reasons - so much that you become TOTALLY CONVINCED in this rather silly idea. And you know, in the desert nomad days, their therapy was pretty crude afaik, so you could be really passionate about a completely stupid idea without necessarily triggering people's "this man is mad" instinct. Just like nowadays.
The stuff you said about church is funny, because it is really just boring religious TV without the TV part, right? I always wondered how boring people found it when they had the linguistic familiarity and attention span to really pay attention to the insane and brutal bits, like how much of that is intended to "scare childish dopes into complying" like some people think nowadays, and how much is intended to make everyone go WOAH like the Matrix? But immensely dignified and ancient. I don't think looking at it that way makes it stupid or lame, it just elevates everything else, like anything people do now could just be an expression of spirituality. I know people have the capacity to approach art on different "levels" depending on where it's coming from e.g. how you appreciate a picture made by your little kid relative with a different part of your heart than you appreciate a really surprisingly good song, lush VR visuals or IRL mountain. I've been made to feel really deeply by all sorts of random bits of media that most people would have no reason to pay attention to, but it's not like "religious" because............. ?????????????? It doesn't have any costumes and I don't evangelize MUCH about it I guess. And maybe because it's not concerned with the state of my immortal soul and therefore doesn't have a place on the afterlife battleground debate.