Well excuuuuse me, Princess. I thought they were pretty funny. So what do YOU find amusing, besides being a nostrils-in-the-air webcomic critic?

some xkcds are good, those weren't, and they weren't new. thanks for the links though.

xkcdsucks is generally horrible. their tags are pretty good but their critiques grasp at straws then they rave about much worse comics. http://xkcdexplained.com/ is much funnier and does a similar job

also w/r/t that anatomy one, there's a lot of pictures on wikipedia that seem amatuerish, pretty sure that's all it's getting at (xkcd jokes rely on pointing stuff out that you've noticed, if you haven't noticed it then they're not funny (this doesn't mean they are if you have)), and peniiiii are less acceptable everywhere, especially erect.

Everybody goes through a phase where they read xkcd. most people grow out of it.

I never read it and do not plan to in any of my lives

Well excuuuuse me, Princess. I thought they were pretty funny. So what do YOU find amusing, besides being a nostrils-in-the-air webcomic critic?

I missed this earlier but uh do you want me to just namedrop the webcomics I read?  Because they're all infinitely better than XKCD.

Dinosaur Comics, Achewood, Gunshow, Great! (by the person who did Minus), Jerkcity, Buttersafe, Super Mega Comics, Weapon Brown, idk probably more but those are the ones I could think of off the top of my head.

Really though Juris I don't see what your problem is.  I think XKCD is horrible.  However, because of this you've decided I'm a crazy angry feminist elitist who hates everything.  What is up with this???  Sorry I don't like your favorite webcomic, bub!  Get used to it  ​  I mean really, if you come in here after this and say "Yeah well jerkcity is nothing but jokes about sucking dick it's dumb" I'd just go "okay well it's not for you".  Not call you an elitist or w/e it was you were trying to say.

About XKCD Sucks:  yes, I know it's a pretty awful site.  That's why I said 'I hate to do this'. But, here's the way I see it:  the actual posts themselves are nitpicky and annoying.  However, the reason I like the site anyway is because this dude keeps track of what Randall's doing in XKCD.  And so, when he contradicts himself (like I said with discrediting any non-science major but then talking about interesting things in sociology or english or any of that), XKCD Sucks not only points it out, but also links to examples of comics that are the problem.  Or, when he's being a total creep in his comics about that Megan chick (this has probably always been the creepiest thing about XKCD for me, anything involving her), he has links to other examples.  It's almost more of a REFERENCE than something I read for the interesting posts.  So I guess it's more pointing out overarching terrible themes in XKCD than whatever he has to say about the particular comic of the day.  Like Frisky SKeleton, it's more or less good tags and a reference point for other examples.

I'm 99% manly.

I'm 99% manly.

 

I'm 99% manly

And here I was on the assumption that you where 100% Fag.... Well let me assume the 1% is still fag.

I don't think you realize you were being trollololed. tbh I don't really read webcomics much, so I appreciate the new material you mention.

then maybe you don't know how to troll properly

"heh i was just trollin" easiest copout ever

here's my copout:  this is retarded and i'm done arguin it

And here I was on the assumption that you where 100% Fag.... Well let me assume the 1% is still fag.

i love u

ohmgah I am offended I will play the class card! MY SOCIOECONOMIC STANDING HAS PREDISPOSED ME TO LIKE "BAD" HUMOR AND YOU ELITIST PIGS ARE TRYING TO REDEFINE WHAT HUMOR IS GOOD! MY CLASS IS BEING SUBJUGATED! FASCIST HUMOR NAZIS! ABUSE! I CALL PHENOMENOLOGICAL ABUSE!

Velfarre I was pulling your chain about the PC bit. I realize that you're defending your likes. The Internet is a free country. Anyone can like whatever the hell they want, and say whatever the hell they want to say.
And some extra special people, every monday, wednesday, and friday, write massive articles lambasting every xkcd that ever comes up.

So bascally what you're sayng s that anyone can le what they le but Vellfare can' wthn the socoeconomc standng or a naz cunt? where do you get off callng people cunts? what role does the pens have n your post? Hard to beleve that one post s the source of all ths analyss.  mean usng the same logc you apply here half the world are cunts wthot a pens n sght? How do you explan that? Therefore yoru belef that Xscd s NOT bad s entrely unreasonable and n fact holds less water than a glass half-full. t's not partcularly bad at all maybe a lttle fuc spalstc but that's hardly enough to say she's wrong. The only P.C. one here s you.

i thought only your i key was broken, is your k broken too?

here's some extra's for ya bud, i can share ​  iiiiiiiiiiiiiiii kkkkkkkkkkkkkk

they change all the tme but  s constant.

 wll boomar that post 

it wouldn't be so bad if it was keys that you don't constantly need

edit: haha BOOMAR is such a good word

stop mang fun of me OH FUC mang becomes mang.  loo le otomon.

stop mang fun of me OH FUC mang becomes mang.  loo le otomon.

i'm not makin fun i really did like boomar

ffff mang though...i am gonna make fun of mang you really are otomon

also iirc he does sometimes copy i but that's gotta be such a hassle to do all the time

Except for the fact that you're neglecting to type I's because they're supposed to be phallic or something.

wow if you read the post right after his you'd know why he wasn't typing i's.  can you read even?

 was mang UGH fun of jurs but  also le t. but i also li_e it because it's how i feel why should i have to copy & paste letters for YOU when that's not how i feel? i am a few _eys short. please don't judge me for who i am.