when i read this sentence the image of a geyser of shit spewing feces mightily into the upper atmosphere just popped (pooped) into my head out of nowhere
one out of every six people on the planet belong to a religion which says that women can't serve as clergy, which is to say that only men are fit to relay the will of god.
the old testament is filled this crap that essentially amounts to "slut-shaming," and other gems like dudes are worth fifty bux but women are only worth thirty
and oh man oh man islam is not any better. they've got your run-of-the-mill gender fascism plus an influential extremist minority to boot!
it might be fair to say that many of the major branches of the world's Abrahamic faiths don't really treat women like absolute shit, but to suggest that anything approaching gender equality exists in more than a thimblefull of abrahamic organizations is mad dumb.
Hmm, quite emotive, but I get your point. You're right - as I stated earlier, many religious groups DO use religious texts to persecute, and not just women. However, like I said, many of the branches of the major Abrahamic faiths don't. To claim that I'm being "mad dumb" for bringing up information based on the religious positions of various faiths is a little weird.
Oh, and where did I say that gender equality actually, or fully, exists? I said "considers". Just because you consider men and women to be equals doesn't mean that gender problems in society are going to suddenly be fixed. Men earn around 1/5 more money than women in the same positions when you get into the non-public sector professional world, yet we live in a society where women are proclaimed to be equal. Considering us to be equal, and then acting upon that, is not necessarily the reality.
I also pointed out that the CONSIDERING of women and men being equal doesn't fully equate that in a society where men and women aren't ALREADY equal, hence why there are so few female lords in the UK, so few female managers and so on, in comparison with men. In a society like that, it's natural that there will be fewer women vicars, bishops, and rabbis. It reflects the overall.
So YES - I will repeat, the point of the discussion wasn't meant to be religion, even though it has evolved to that. It's concerning gender roles and, more specifically, transgender people. It's fine if you consider all religions to be women-hating cults, but what do you (or anyone else) feel about gender roles in our society?