I wonder what you get out of life except stupid rpgmaker games. I don't see how anyone except people who are exactly like you could find you lovable in any way.

I suggest you change your title to Chauvinist Philistine instead of RM God, it's a tad more fitting.






(also no the post where we will be blown away will be the obvious revelation he was like Kezay and trolling us all along from prison)

WHY are men more suited to be president, WHY are men better at sports, WHY are men more likely to have world records, WHY can't women make games?

Some things are just like they are. We don't have explanations for everything although we know stuff like you mentioned here are simply facts. Just like nobody knows why beings yawn and start yawning when seeing others yawn... we simply know it's the way it is.

I don't see how anyone except people who are exactly like you could find you lovable in any way.

Did I say anybody loves me?

And no, I'm not online from prison. Didn't even know they have internet in prison.

Some things are just like they are. We don't have explanations for everything although we know stuff like you mentioned here are simply facts. Just like nobody knows why beings yawn and start yawning when seeing others yawn... we simply know it's the way it is.

Hi this isn't one of those things.  Everyone agrees that sometimes seeing someone yawn makes you yawn (by the way, we do have a very good idea of why this is).  You're the only one who is saying that women can't make games or do any of these other things.  That means you have to actually give reasons, or admit that you have no reasons which probably means that it's just coming out of your own contempt towards women.

So try again, bub!

Wait, I didn't say women can't be president. Some did. But more males did so far.
And so it's with the games: women can make them, males just can do way better.

And about the yawn: nothing about it is proved. "very good ideas", okay, but ideas are just ideas after all.

And about the yawn: nothing about it is proved. "very good ideas", okay, but ideas are just ideas after all.

Having solid scientific theories is a lot different than "this is just some mysterious thing that always has been".

And again, even if we had no clue at all this is something that we all agree to be true.  Nobody is agreeing with you about your statements towards women.  This is why you have to justify it.  By the way, the argument you halfway tried to make doesn't make sense either.  There being fewer women presidents doesn't mean that men are better at the job.  It just means that there are...fewer women presidents.  There are fewer women than men in a lot of fields, but that doesn't mean that women aren't as good at those things.  There are tons and tons of social issues that lead to there being less women in various things.  This has nothing to do with their aptitude.  So where is your proof that women are worse than men at making games (or any of the other great cans of worms you opened up earlier)?

Nobody is agreeing with you about your statements towards women.

Still the facts can't be ignored.

There being fewer women presidents doesn't mean that men are better at the job.  It just means that there are...fewer women presidents

Well, people's choice. Just like when determinating the best gam.
Also politicians select a candidate for the job before the public voting starts. So for some reason most of them consider men more worthy for the job, most of the time.

None of this is evidence as to why women are incapable of doing any of these things what part of this do you not understand.

"There are more men in government than women" is a fact.  "Men are better at being president than women" is not a fact.  Figure this out.

Then why are more men there? And why do men have better results in sports? Figure THOSE FACTS out!

Then why are more men there? And why do men have better results in sports? Figure THOSE FACTS out!

That's your job, you figure it out.  You're the one using it as an argument.


Hint: none of it is because of what you probably believe it to be caused by.

I already said there are FACTS that are unexplainable, but undoubtable.

I already said there are FACTS that are unexplainable, but undoubtable.

They're very explainable.  But their explanations don't support your arguments at all.

Facts are facts. Eat it.

I don't even CARE for reasons. We don't have nor need to know the reason for everything.
I just gave you other examples. No matter if they were very similar or quite unsimilar.

Facts are facts. Eat it.

I don't even CARE for reasons. We don't have nor need to know the reason for everything.
I just gave you other examples. No matter if they were very similar or quite unsimilar.

This isn't an argument and at this point you are basically admitting you have nothing to support your misogyny except misappropriating statistical facts into "evidence" for a conclusion they don't even vaguely support.  Okay, great!

Statistics > all

Statistics > all

You don't understand what I'm saying, do you?  The statistics you're putting forward are true--but they don't support your argument even one bit.  It's the way you're trying to USE them that's wrong, not the facts themselves.  But you're such an obtuse person that I shouldn't bother trying to make this clear for you.

I would prefer to use this topic to talk about the gam now.

Obviously all of them had men make their games for them.