you are both pretty stupid.
a) for arguing over dragon ball
b) for arguing over dragon ball
Yup, movie makers will spend thousands just to annoy nerds. Nothing enjoys expensive studios more than flushing money down the drain.
It's a test to see how the prosphetics look on camera/film. It's a final design (and looks consciderably more interesting than some lame monkey) and they ain't gunna change it apart from minor cosmetics. Deal with it.
"fans" aren't the audience for this movie. The general public are, if a movie of any franchise was made to please it's fans it'd be the worst box office failure in history. Look at Transformers, look at Dark Knight, look at the upcomming G.I. Joe movie. Stuff gets changed to make it appeal to a wider audience. Very few people would take the idea of a stupid monkey being some ultra-powerful being as a serious concept, even for a movie based on dbz it would lose all credibility.
See, the bits in bold were actually a very good post, it's just the rest is pretty stupid (and the follow-up).
So what if it's a monkey? That's the original. Would you have preferred to have seen a GIANT ALIEN replacing King Kong in the/a remake? King Kong is the man.
If it's the original, you should stick to the original, it's not about it 'selling better', a giant earth-destroying monkey is an awesome idea if pulled off correctly. There's no point excusing it if they changed it (I mean, hell. you excused Godzilla 97 in your last post which was pretty stupid, that film was
terrible).
But yeah, arguing over Dragon Baaaall.