Man it seems like only two people who replied can read an article.
Here's what I DIDN'T read in the article:
"THOSE FUCKIN HONKEYS ARE RUININ OUR CHILLUN! WE MUST BREAK AWAY FROM THESE FUCKS AND USE PUBLIC DOLLARS FOR A SCHOOL FOR EXCLUSIVELY BLACK CHILDREN!"
...which is what most of you are responding to.
No, there is a very clear problem wherin a large majority of students who 1) drop out or 2) are suspended (I would guess expelled as well, although I'll admit I'm extrapolating there and the article doesn't explicitly state it) HAVE one thing in common: they're black. The school would be centered around creating an environment where black children could succeed instead of drop out and be suspended . Aside from the first line (and it sounds like most of you didn't read past it), there is absolutely nothing that even implies that black students would be allowed in to the exclusion of other races, only that the school's focus would be on the issues which cause this mass dropout rate, and the mass suspension rate (NINETY EIGHT PERCENT of which are blacks), in order to try to fix the problem of HIGH RATES OF DROPOUTS AND SUSPENSIONS AMONG BLACK YOUTH.
It would be focused on the problems which cause this, but
"I think we're talking about the possibility of a school that would have black-focussed programs -- but they'd be available to any student who wanted to attend them," board chair Sheila Ward told CTV News Toronto.
Wow, will you look at that HARDCORE RACISM EXCLUDE WHITEY BLACK SUPREMACY.
I mean, Christ, I don't see how that could be interpreted any other way than "there is a specific problem we are going to set out to fix which involves black children and their educational needs, but we won't exclude anyone else."
I simply don't see anything wrong with that.