no
I am just saying that sixty years is TOO MUCHThe kid needs a straightjacket, not a sixty year old sentence in jail.
EDIT: JUST FYI, I do not sympathise with the kid that raped the girl. I think that what he did was bad and he deserved a punishment but(I will say it again) SIXTY YEARS IS TOO MUCH FOR FUCK'S SAKE.
Yeah, keep crying about the 15 year old.
I mean, seriously, the girl is SIX years old, the boy is FIFTEEN. If he doesn't know better at 15 then he's not going to know better at, say, 18. If they gave him LIFE I wouldn't have any sympathy for him. He deserves EVERY. FUCKING. YEAR. of his sentence. There is NO reason whatsoever why his sentence should be lightened.
Just for fun, let's see what this kid inflicted to get this OH SO HARSH PUNISHMENT:
From her hospital bed at St. Louis Children's Hospital two days after the assault, the victim picked out Burnett from a school yearbook picture. She had half an ear torn off, a lascerated liver, a skull fracture and bruises from the top of her head to her thighs.
She told police she couldn't walk after the attack. She crawled through a hole in a fence near railroad tracks but could go no further and, as night descended in woods near her house, she tried to cover herself with leaves. A police officer found her the next morning after a massive neighborhood search.
He should rot in hell and you should go there with him for suggesting his sentence was too harsh. You don't do this shit to a fucking 6 year old (or to anyone, for that matter). You're probably thinking he's not going to have much of a life because of what he did to her. Good, because she may not either.