Topic: Sesame Street DVDs rated 18+ and for adults only (Read 3648 times)

  • Avatar of The Dude
  • Artist, novelist, gamer, and friend.
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Premium Member
  • Joined: May 29, 2003
  • Posts: 1798
Wow.

just wow.

I cannot actually believe this.

This is even stupider than santa saying ho.

Took the words out of my mouth--before I had time to think them.

That does it-- I've now got solid grounds to make fun of Murder on Sesame Street, or maybe I'll call it Sesame Hood, in my next game. I was already thinking about it--but now... well, I just HAVE to don't I?
Idiot Muppet bastards. They were good--and now twits in control are destroying it. Kind of like the Simpsons!
  • Avatar of Ihateyou
  • Generic INAP lamer. (nazis suck)
  • PipPip
  • Group: Member
  • Joined: Jul 9, 2002
  • Posts: 273
Wait, GTA gets high ratings and kids want to play it...
Manhunt 2 got banned here, but kids still import it (you can as long as youre the only one playing it, meaning the ban is useless)...
Horror movies are frequently viewed by minors...

£10 says giving it an adults only rating will make kids want to watch it more :D
I say they look more like german/caveman then asians.
The Germans are coming to beat you with clubs and spears!
Quote
Hundley: Damnit kid, get off my lawn!
Faust: NOT UNTIL YOU GIVE MY MY PANTS BACK HUNDLEY!
  • aye ess dee eff el cay jay ache
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Premium Member
  • Joined: Jun 24, 2005
  • Posts: 5149
this is nuts because i find some values in modern childrens shows really frightening. has anyone seen mulan 2?

sesame street was awesome. i think they need a new rating system for shows based on how smart the child is.
like "DON'T BUY THIS DVD IF YOUR CHILD IS GOOFY/IS LIKELY TO MIMIC A BLUE MONSTER MORON"
I USE Q'S INSTEQD OF Q'S
  • So-Called Manga Artist
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Premium Member
  • Joined: Mar 18, 2007
  • Posts: 2165
this is nuts because i find some values in modern childrens shows really frightening. has anyone seen mulan 2?

sesame street was awesome. i think they need a new rating system for shows based on how smart the child is.
like "DON'T BUY THIS DVD IF YOUR CHILD IS GOOFY/IS LIKELY TO MIMIC A BLUE MONSTER MORON"

:rite:

And yeah, banning it will make kids look at it more :)
  • Avatar of Ragnar
  • Worthless Protoplasm
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Premium Member
  • Joined: Jun 15, 2002
  • Posts: 6536
They totally ignored that every kids show ever is pretty much an endorsement for LSD
http://djsaint-hubert.bandcamp.com/
 
  • Avatar of Vellfire
  • TV people want to leave
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Premium Member
  • Joined: Feb 13, 2004
  • Posts: 9602
If these people saw Avenue Q they'd throw a fucking fit.
I love this hobby - stealing your mother's diary
BRRING! BRRING!
Hello!  It's me, Vellfire!  FOLLOW ME ON TWITTER! ... Bye!  CLICK!  @gidgetnomates
  • Avatar of olrox
  • Comrade!
  • Pip
  • Group: Member
  • Joined: Jun 13, 2004
  • Posts: 111
that tv shows are insane
mod note: your sig is too big, 500px X 200px max
  • Avatar of ReloadXPsi
  • im in a wrld of tri4ce
  • PipPip
  • Group: Member
  • Joined: Jul 4, 2002
  • Posts: 268
The things people think their kids need to hide from these days. I accidentally encountered a lot of stuff that was allegedly inappropriate in my youth and I didn't turn into a heroin junkie or anything. Today's kids have shit like Lemonparty to look forward to, and no amount of sticking ratings on things will prevent that.
http://www.angelfire.com/rpg/supponibarodu/
Yeah so SpoonyBard eventually did a new Final Fallacy game.
  • Avatar of Raimiette
  • Hippity-Hoppity Bumpity-Boo! This little Panda is better than you!
  • Pip
  • Group: Premium Member
  • Joined: May 30, 2002
  • Posts: 189
If these people saw Avenue Q they'd throw a fucking fit.

lol, Avenue Q wasn't made for children though.

(also, you are awesome for knowing what Avenue Q is)

EDIT:  Also, this is retarded.  Why'd they have to make it 18+, couldn't they have just made it like 10+ or something.
http://www.moola.com:80/moopubs/b2b/exc/join.jsp?sid=4d5449744d7a45794f44413d-2

PS3 ID: Raimiette
360 ID: Raimiette
Wii ID: 0025 9688 9581 1136
  • Group: Guest
Hahahh vasectomy, very funny but no thanks I don't want any stupid TV show indoctrinating my children
What do you mean Inri Cheetos?
  • Avatar of headphonics
  • sea of vodka
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Member
  • Joined: Dec 24, 2003
  • Posts: 6432
you know, the taking the hands of strangers thing is really the only questionable event on that entire list.  the rest, even if when you state it in such a skewed way, is presented in such a benign manner that it's really not nearly as huge an issue as it seems like they want it to be.  it's like they went looking for anything that could be considered even remotely close to controversial, BY ANYONE, and blew it out of proportion.  even if kids were smart enough at their age to know that what big bird is doing is hallucinating, and that in actuality it's a symptom commonly associated with drug use, the context and tone of the skit really makes it clear, even to the kid, that it's not due to anything so negative.  if you just want to take it out of context, then sure, cookie monster smoking and then eating a pipe can seem kind of odd.  but if you watch it in its entirety, it's pretty obviously a harmless parody that's topped off by an action more typical of cookie monster (the eating) than it would be of the character he's mimicking.  a kid would just think this is cookie monster being silly and up to his same old tricks as he as he eats more and more junk; he'd think it was funny.  he wouldn't think it was cookie monster actively condoning the act of smoking.  no kid would ever think this. even from an adult perspective, one could argue that the eating of the pipe at the end of the scene sends the opposite message.  this is what i thought when i was watching it as a four year old (not the part about eating the pipe being symbolic of anything).  being a stupid four year old, i didn't associate the act of cookie monster smoking a pipe with ANY sort of message, positive or negative.  it was just him pretending to be an old guy with a funny accent smoking a pipe (as i had noticed, by then, many old guys with funny accents did). it was funny!

this entire thing is really mostly absurd.  it's like they're making an assumption that children who know absolutely nothing about clinical depression and eating disorders and nicotine addictions will see this in anything resembling the same way an adult who was actively looking for controversy would.
Last Edit: November 23, 2007, 05:42:15 pm by bazookatooth
  • Avatar of Blitzen
  • some sort of land-cow
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Premium Member
  • Joined: Sep 25, 2002
  • Posts: 935
I'm pretty sure the "eating pipes" thing was a nudge from the writer, poking fun at any perception of inappropriateness by anyone at Sesame Street.

But man, cookie monster would eat anything. I think I even remember that once he ate a door.

My question is, who is putting these PC, overly sensitized cowards in charge of censorship? They should be shot with arrows by some Indians, imo. When did people become so afraid of the obviouisly minute chances of pissing off some tightly wound soccer mom?
outerspacepotatoman
  • Avatar of post
  • +++
  • Pip
  • Group: Member
  • Joined: Sep 22, 2006
  • Posts: 143
People are a bit too concerned with what they don't know about children and how they think.  Although I believe children are the brightest people on earth, I do not think they would make the same connections nor try any of this stuff in real life *unless they are complete dumbasses.  I watched Seasame Street when I was a child, and I don't remember getting diabetes, smoking, or being gay in a shitty basement apartmnent.  Seasame street was funny.
Jun 10 2004, 10:35:32 PM
  • Militaryman and self-learned game maker
  • Group: Premium Member
  • Joined: Dec 16, 2006
  • Posts: 43
Man, this is pretty ridiculous.  It makes me think just what is wrong with people when the standards at the upper end (adult television programming, especially cartoons) are becoming looser, while the standards at the lower end (children's television programming) are becoming tighter.  There's no longer that ambiguity between what you could get away with in a children's television program and what you couldn't, because when they pitch a children's television program, it's absolutely for children this time, because "if I wanted to pitch and write for an adult program, I'd pitch it to Spike TV/Adult Swim/G4", etc, and unfortunately, when some people get into the mindset that something is "for children," it's dumbed down and sanitized, and I think that's the wrong way to go about it. 

There's an actual market for adult cartoon television programming, and I think that hurts the entire gamut of children's programming in the long run.  My friends and I were talking about how it's pretty weird nowadays that shows like SpongeBob Squarepants and The Fairly Oddparents are pretty deceptively complex when it comes to script and how clever they are when they work the jokes in, and how they're just like the old favorites in that regard, like Rocko's Modern Life, Darkwing Duck, and Aaaah! Real Monsters.


(this post has been redeemed, see this topic for more info!)
Last Edit: November 23, 2007, 07:10:57 pm by Captain Goodluck
Catch me if you can!  Be one of the first three people to quote me in this topic! You could win $30 in indie games!
  • Avatar of Ragnar
  • Worthless Protoplasm
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Premium Member
  • Joined: Jun 15, 2002
  • Posts: 6536
Wait how is Snuffleufagus (sp?) a hallucination and not just IMAGINARY FRIEND
http://djsaint-hubert.bandcamp.com/
 
  • Avatar of Dale Gobbler
  • Meh.
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Premium Member
  • Joined: Dec 24, 2003
  • Posts: 2079




Unless it has Big Bird teaching kids about porn or Oscar discovering the "F" word, I don't see what would justify an adult rating.  :blarg:
Last Edit: November 23, 2007, 07:59:05 pm by Aztec
m
ohap
  • Avatar of headphonics
  • sea of vodka
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Member
  • Joined: Dec 24, 2003
  • Posts: 6432
Wait how is Snuffleufagus (sp?) a hallucination and not just IMAGINARY FRIEND
i think the difference lies in whether or not the person who sees him truly believes he's real.
  • Avatar of kentona
  • even more eviler than Skeletor
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Premium Member
  • Joined: Apr 14, 2005
  • Posts: 1240
the person is an eight foot tall talking bird.

I wonder if the Flintstones should be Adult Only since only Fred and Barney can see the Great Gazoo?

..:: Full game is released.  Download it now! ::..
  • Avatar of Swordfish
  • Comrade!?! I AM NOT A FUCKING RUSSIAN
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Premium Member
  • Joined: Sep 12, 2003
  • Posts: 1074
That, and they don't wear underwear.
RIP DoktorMartini

My brute!
  • Avatar of Marcus
  • THE FAT ONE
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Premium Member
  • Joined: Sep 28, 2002
  • Posts: 2690
This has been coming up a lot with dvd releases of old cartoons like how Loony Toons and Tom and Jerry have fucking "intended for adult collectors only lulz" written on them.  One of the BIGGEST disappointments this year came when Little, Brown witheld the publication of The Adventures of Tintin gift set (which contained, for the first time in America, EVERY published tintin adventure in one hardbound package) because a few of the earlier books contained racial stereotypes like squinty eyed, buck toothed chinese guys and big lipped black people.

Why is it that society (and not just American society because the UK was a major factor in the publication delay) must DENY its history?  It's like we want to teach our kids that NOTHING BAD EVER HAPPENS?  Why is it that publishers must treat us like fucking idiots and FUCKING IDIOTS get clear cut advantages in civil law suits!?  The problem with society is the lack of parenting.  If I was a parent of a five year old child, I would view everything they would unless I was 100% certain it contained material they wouldn't understand.  Even if I was sure, I'd ask them what they learned or how they felt about it.  Fucking parents these days pretty much sit their kids in front of the TV and leave.  In all honesty, my follks did the same but they pretty much drilled me at the end of the day to make sure I didn't turn into a nutjob with no sense of reality and fantasy.

But I digress, I think this is retarded.  I'm pretty sure any sane parent would laugh at the warning when they pick up box.