1. steroids are illegal. the mlb or any other sport league doesn't want to be seen as illegal and i don't think any sport league would want to take the bodybuilding "we don't use drugs p.s. if you do not have super muscles compete in MR NATURAL EVENTS" approach.
sure, i don't blame them for that or anything. i'm just not going to stress over it if their grand scheme doesn't work or if players i like get busted. i've been following professional baseball for a very long time now, and definitely enjoyed it through years where the vast majority of baseball players were "cheating".
2. straight edge players don't like the idea of steroids because it makes it harder for them to compete and they don't want to die / have serious health problems / testicle shrinkage just to hit baseballs harder.
don't get me wrong, i don't like the idea of it either. i mean, i would be very happy if they could one day get to the point where they had some genuinely fool-proof way of eliminating steroids from the game entirely. however, for the foreseeable future, i see it as being an extremely uphill battle, and i just don't think it's worth worrying about when it comes to following professional baseball. like everyone says, it's more about the purity of the game(and NUMBERS) than it really is about doing things outside of the rulebook. but in all honesty, if i want to get a taste of real baseball purity i'll get some buddies together and actually play the game. i don't think anybody can realistically turn to major league baseball and expect much PETE ROSE ACTION. baseball has been the way it currently is for an extremely long time.
i could care less what they do but the idea that genuinely talented guys won't make the cut because they don't do drugs is very disheartening to me.
disheartening, yeah, but nowadays when it comes to actually watching the games and following the players, you really have no way of saying X PLAYER NEVER GOT THAT CHANCE. there have been players i said that about that i REALLY did not think took steroids that ended up in Mitchell's book.
i'm primarily talking about
Howie Clark here, but this is honestly one of the players that i thought was one of the "good guys." if someone asked me to compile a list of 20 active players that i was REALLY CONVINCED wasn't on steroids, i'd have put him on it. he was never a great player, but Clark was one of those scrappy singles hitters that really seemed to make the absolute most of his opportunity. you could tell he liked the game an awful lot, and the fans always responded to that in both the majors and the minors. i always thought he was deserving of much more of a chance than he was given. i distinctly remember in the past using him as an example of the kind of player that i thought was getting snubbed because of the abundance of steroid users in major league baseball. and, as it turned out, i was completely wrong about the guy.
so yeah, disheartening when you think of baseball on some really general level. you actually have no way of really knowing this as you're actively watching or following the game. you can really only assume that there are players somewhere not getting that chance because PLAYER X doesn't really deserve to be there.
ps i didn't know you liked/followed baseball, dude.