i think half-life 2 is a better game than portal, to be honest. portal is essentially NEW/COOL IDEA, repeated through various scenarios for 3 hours, with a sense of humor. it's just fuckery. half-life 2, to me, has substantially more depth and exists as more than just a single idea, carried out. it is probably one of my favorite fps ever. that is what it boils down to, really; portal is ultimately kind of shallow and mostly just gets by on its novelty and how it's pretty well-executed. while i absolutely appreciate the presence of new ideas, even if it's just for the sake of having NEW IDEAS, i'd also like them to have more than a passing amount of depth. portal, like shadow of the colossus, is the definition of one-note. but where sotc had things that i felt redeemed it (one of which was its relative brevity, which i'll admit portal also has going for it), portal mostly does not. it's cool, but as i said, incredibly shallow. half-life 2 was really cool and cinematic and very methodically and expertly designed, which makes the fact that it's not a short game all the more easily appreciated. i'm not sure if i'd call the premise as original as portal's (in fact, i probably wouldn't), but i felt that it made up for that by having immeasurably more depth and better execution/lasting appeal, as well as just seeming like it was a much more caringly orchestrated game, if you understand what i mean like that.
Last Edit: January 11, 2008, 02:33:21 am by bazookatooth