Hundley brings up a point worth discussing.
I assume that (if you're like me) you dislike advertising because millions of dollars are poured into it for the purpose of promoting a product, often superficially. So for example, Coke commercials during the Super Bowl - everyone knows what Coke is, and a 30-second spot costs over 2 million dollars. The same goes with Apple's video ads comparing OSX and Windows - I've never seen them aired on television (someone correct me if they have) and all they really seem to be for is to let Mac users have a private chuckle. Windows users have to go out of their way to see them. Ads like that is a waste of money, and I'll hate that easily.
But I've seen really creative commercials in all the mindless promotion. Like, artists and musicians are often hired to make something and it really helps them - financially, yes, but also getting exposure and practice. An obscure Asian hip hop group (Mountain Brothers?) were featured on a Sprite radio commercial and that's how they got noticed. I've found
Zune Arts to have some really experimental stuff in their animation, and this wouldn't be out there if Microsoft didn't tell an artist, "Hey, go nuts."
I mean, obviously, there's a limit to their creative expression when working on an ad, but they're getting paid for it! Someone, somewhere in all the money pouring down the drain is at least getting supported as they work towards being well off enough to be able to do whatever the hell they want creatively, so where do you draw the line?