i thought hd-dvd would win because blu-ray is a retarded word
this is exactly what i thought for a long time, too. hd dvd is a very recognizable brand. you've got HIGH DEF which people all have giant hard-ons for, and dvd, which is a household term. hd dvd just sounds like people would accept it more readily than blu-ray. also, the 360 is doing better here than the ps3 is, so that played a part too. but what i didn't bank on was the fact that the ps3 actually included a blu-ray player, where the 360 had an hd dvd periph that costs like $200, and that even though the 360 is doing better in the states, the ps3 is seriously beating the shit out of it in japan (i don't even understand this; EVEN IN JAPAN the library of games for the ps3 is terrible and it's overpriced. fucking japanese people), and i think the owners of both formats are based there, so naturally not only is that the first market they'd look to when determining whose format is more pervasive, but also on a global scale or whatever, things probably just aren't the same as they are here. i kind of wish this wasn't the case, because the ps3 is gay as shit and i really just kind of want it to bomb and lose a ton of money and unfortunately that probably won't happen since a) it's a relatively inexpensive player of the new format of videos, and b) japanese people have no taste and for some reason are coming out in droves to buy a terrible console.
i don't really give a shit either way, since i don't plan on buying any of this stuff, but i don't want to have to say blu-ray. hd dvd would've at least been okay.