Topic: There is a gigantic hole in the universe. (Read 2948 times)

  • Avatar of Orange00
  • Comrade!
  • PipPip
  • Group: Member
  • Joined: May 11, 2005
  • Posts: 267
Well I don't know how the case really is, I understand next to nothing about these things. I was just passing time like a year ago reading this science magazine where they said universe is actually shrinking(not the right word, more like pulled together) instead of expanding as they used to think. There was also some talk that Einstein's theories might be bullshit in the end or don't follow the same laws with dark matter.

In any case, I get the picture that no person really knows a shit. It's just talk.
  • None of them knew they were robots.
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Premium Member
  • Joined: Nov 5, 2006
  • Posts: 3242
Evangel and OrangeO's you know you're not supposed to question scientific dogmata, right? If you do you're either a moron or a troll (that's not my opinion it's GW's).

These are the truths you must NEVER question:

- The universe is expanding
- Scientists never make mistakes
- The equipment scientists use is perfect and free from interference or defects
- Dark matter

To doubt and question any of these is the worst crime against humanity you can commit right now
Play Raimond Ex (if you haven't already)


I'll not TAKE ANYTHING you write like this seriously because it looks dumb
  • Avatar of UPRC
  • No, it doesn't stand for anything.
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Premium Member
  • Joined: May 25, 2002
  • Posts: 2974
Uh Inri Cheetos... Are you being serious? Because some of your "truths" are nonsense while others are pretty true.

The universe is expanding: Yes (At least to our knowledge)
Scientists never make mistakes: No
  • None of them knew they were robots.
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Premium Member
  • Joined: Nov 5, 2006
  • Posts: 3242
Well if scientists make mistakes couldn't the "expansion of the universe" and this void be one of them?
Play Raimond Ex (if you haven't already)


I'll not TAKE ANYTHING you write like this seriously because it looks dumb
  • Avatar of xanque
  • The Corrector
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Premium Member
  • Joined: Sep 15, 2002
  • Posts: 741
Well if scientists make mistakes couldn't the "expansion of the universe" and this void be one of them?
Of course there are a lot of mistakes in astronomy (Hubble himself miscalculated the age of the universe, and it was accepted for years before anyone questioned it), but more than one astronomer works on these things.  Most theories, especially the really big ones, are tested and retested by many different people.  It would take some truly serious flaws in ALL of this kind of research for these things to be wrong.

HOWEVER, what most of these astronomers make clear is that the 'known' concepts of the universe are merely what we can determine with what we currently have.  There is a lot of evidence for the Big Bang, and that the universe (ours at least) is not infinite. 

Personally, I believe the universe as we know it did start with the Big Bang, but has been in a cycle forever.  I believe this because I've read many books and articles, and taken classes on the subject (as well as on opposing beliefs) and this just makes the most sense. 

If there's ever a theory that makes more sense, and is as thoroughly researched as the Big Bang, I will be more than happy to jump on that bandwagon.
  • One of many...
  • Pip
  • Group: Member
  • Joined: Jul 9, 2006
  • Posts: 126
Inri, the void couldn't be a mistake because even in the presented article it states that other such 'holes' have been discovered. I mean come on, can so many people make the same mistake on so many occasions?...well yea...but very highly improbable, near impossible.
  • None of them knew they were robots.
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Premium Member
  • Joined: Nov 5, 2006
  • Posts: 3242
Yes because some other people had the same conclusion it's absolutely impossible that anything else is also a possibility.

Quote
There is a lot of evidence ... that the universe (ours at least) is not infinite.

No there isn't.
Last Edit: March 11, 2008, 05:32:53 am by Inri Cheetos
Play Raimond Ex (if you haven't already)


I'll not TAKE ANYTHING you write like this seriously because it looks dumb
  • Avatar of Brown
  • ブラウンの人
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Premium Member
  • Joined: Jul 17, 2004
  • Posts: 1160
It's them, do not be fooled. This is the only warning we will get.

my thoughts exactly

//
  • Avatar of Vellfire
  • TV people want to leave
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Premium Member
  • Joined: Feb 13, 2004
  • Posts: 9602
No there isn't.

fffff nice reply

you do realize that this is your exact argument here, don't you?
I love this hobby - stealing your mother's diary
BRRING! BRRING!
Hello!  It's me, Vellfire!  FOLLOW ME ON TWITTER! ... Bye!  CLICK!  @gidgetnomates
  • Avatar of The Dude
  • Artist, novelist, gamer, and friend.
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Premium Member
  • Joined: May 29, 2003
  • Posts: 1798
You're all silly. All stars are holes, letting in the light from outside. The atmosphere reaches around our galaxy in unbreathable porportions, and the big black ball that surrounds us is poked by giant aliens who keep us in a well-lit room.
That's my fool-proof theory!
(actually that's a complete fabrication. Not a scientist; just a liar)
  • Avatar of bort
  • -
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Premium Member
  • Joined: Jun 29, 2002
  • Posts: 912
it's hell ,satan lives there
  • None of them knew they were robots.
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Premium Member
  • Joined: Nov 5, 2006
  • Posts: 3242
fffff nice reply

you do realize that this is your exact argument here, don't you?

No, I only said it because there really isn't anything that suggests the universe is finite. The scientists still have no idea if it is or is not finite. They've never encountered the "edge of the universe" and since light travels at a finite speed there may be things that are so far away the light they emitted will never hit us or the scientists's telescopes.

Quote
ESA: Is the Universe finite or infinite?
 
Joseph Silk: We don't know.

http://www.esa.int/esaSC/SEMR53T1VED_people_0_iv.html

There is no evidence that the universe is finite. I don't know where you people would get that idea from. But nice try velfarre.
Play Raimond Ex (if you haven't already)


I'll not TAKE ANYTHING you write like this seriously because it looks dumb
  • Avatar of Vellfire
  • TV people want to leave
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Premium Member
  • Joined: Feb 13, 2004
  • Posts: 9602
I wasn't trying anything other than to point out that your argument before this post was "NO IT ISN'T"

Not that it really matters because you're just a big troll anyway but it's great that you're trying to disprove scientific evidence with what is essentially "NUH-UH!!!"
I love this hobby - stealing your mother's diary
BRRING! BRRING!
Hello!  It's me, Vellfire!  FOLLOW ME ON TWITTER! ... Bye!  CLICK!  @gidgetnomates
  • Avatar of Frankie
  • Phylactère Colaaaaaa!
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Premium Member
  • Joined: Jan 25, 2002
  • Posts: 473
Inri is right not to reject the idea that scientists might all be wrong, because their equipment isn't infallible.

But in the current context, until we actually get arguments to have a reasonable doubt of consensuses like this, simply saying "they could be wrong" is worthless. If we ever find conflicting results that make us doubt past observations, then it warrants wondering if our equipment works right. Even if it did turn out that all of our equipment and calculations were wrong somehow, the claim they are wrong remains worthless today, since its right now not based on any logic other than it being a possibility.

Baseless rejections like this is a dangerous arguing path, that can only lead to some sort of absolute rejection of everything. Like, technically maybe you aren't even awake right now, and maybe that your whole life until this point was a dream! You cant prove you aren't dreaming right now any more than scientists can prove their telescopes and equipment work right. You have to simply assume its not the case until you have at least a reason to think otherwise.
Last Edit: March 13, 2008, 12:23:25 am by Psychoskull
Bloggin' | Website | Tubin'|Tweetin'
  • Developer of "Eternal Conflict" Series
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Premium Member
  • Joined: Sep 19, 2006
  • Posts: 784
***sex joke

I can't think of anything to add that people haven't already said.  This is kind of interesting though.  It also gets me thinking about things that no one knows for sure.  I mean it's not like scientists have a marker at the edge of the universe that they can look at and see "Okay the universe is bigger" or "Oh shit, where'd the marker go?! The universe is shrinking!"
  • Avatar of Fatboys #4
  • My username is Tekk, I have the Fatboys virus
  • Pip
  • Group: Premium Member
  • Joined: Dec 15, 2002
  • Posts: 198
Yeah, this isn't a black hole.  Black holes have mass, but this hole has no mass. 

I love when things like this are found, because they force astronomers to reassess their ideas of how the universe works.  It's going to be a long, long time before we have everything figured out.

Eh, I seriously doubt we'll ever figure everything out. If we do, it would only be figured out as it appears to us. So what? Big deal. There's just a very large region of space with nothing in it. How is that at all interesting? Black holes at least distort space and time and all that jazz, this is just a big fucking empty lot. Cool!
  • Lvl 4 Female Dark Elf Blademage
  • Pip
  • Group: Premium Member
  • Joined: Feb 28, 2008
  • Posts: 130
Evangel and OrangeO's you know you're not supposed to question scientific dogmata, right? If you do you're either a moron or a troll (that's not my opinion it's GW's).

These are the truths you must NEVER question:

- The universe is expanding
- Scientists never make mistakes
- The equipment scientists use is perfect and free from interference or defects
- Dark matter

To doubt and question any of these is the worst crime against humanity you can commit right now

And so...you have a better conclusion, I suppose?

This isn't something abstract like religion or morality we're dealing with here, it's fucking science. We accept whatever the Lords of Science  say until they go "Uh whoops, we fucked up, let's change that." And then accept the change.

If a scientist says something, forgive me if I'm inclined to believe it because he's made it his life's work to study this shit. I guess I should just question EVERYTHING so I can seem mysterious and hardcore.

I mean if you have a beef with something a scientist says, study it yourself and try to understand it more, but if you're not really willing to do that and just question things for the sake of being ANTI, you don't really have a case.
Last Edit: March 17, 2008, 04:35:48 pm by pastryface

magazine i write for
  • None of them knew they were robots.
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Premium Member
  • Joined: Nov 5, 2006
  • Posts: 3242
No pastryface I don't conclude anything I just wait until they're 100% sure about the things they discovered instead of automatically accepting anything they say as TRUTH
Play Raimond Ex (if you haven't already)


I'll not TAKE ANYTHING you write like this seriously because it looks dumb