are you sirius
i cannot begin to understand where you get the information to draw an opinion like this. i will not ague with you, because i am 99% sure you are either joking or disagreeing to disagree.
i am actually 100% serious
uwe boll is basically an insignificant BOTTOM FEEDER. that's all he ever was and ever will be. he puts together these sloppy and ridiculous movies(in his defense on very little budget) that nobody gives a shit about except HARD CORE FANS OF BLOODRAYNE and HARDCORE FANS OF MOVIES SO BAD THEY'RE GOOD. the words entirely insignificant should come to mind when thinking about uwe boll, but it somehow doesn't with people. this man has no influence. he has no pull within the medium. all he does is pull together these dreadful movies that get universally ridiculed and ignored.
i find it difficult to avoid comparing uwe boll, somehow public enemy number 1, to all the contemporary iconic film directors that actively fuck up contemporary film through their influence. i'll use quentin tarantino as an example, i guess. the man has only marginal talent at the absolute best, but is CLUNG TO for purely superficial reasons. this wouldn't be that big of a problem but the man ultimately got championed, greatly in part to how he THREW HIMSELF at the world as HEY THIS IS WHAT AMERICAN INDEPENDENT FILM IS. which also wouldn't have been that big of a problem, but the progression of american independent film was irrevocably retarded after all of his stupid goddamn movies lowered the goddamn bar from lots of nobodies making interesting movies to BIG EDGY HOLLYWOOD HARDON where nothing ever got done. it's incredibly fucking sad that we have to rely on GEORGE CLOONEY of all people to be one of the few people to actively go out and try to make american independent film better.
i could go even further and point to totally untalented assholes like george lucas and peter jackson doing everything within their power to make uninventive CGI as a coverup for totally unsubstantial material the standard for filmmaking. fuck, i could make a really long list of these respected directors that are directly responsible for 99% of the movies nowadays being totally shit.
the dangerously counter-productive filmmakers aren't the ones that are laughably bad, but the ones that do identifiable damage to the industry through their stunning lack of talent and accidental influence. the ones that set awful trends that studios and lesser retards blindly follow. film has gotten to the point where MAKING A MOVIE is just alternating between AMAZING CGI and the universal technique of sticking a camera down the throat of MOVIE STAR and just letting them drone through their lines for two fucking hours.
yeah, sorry if i'm not particularly sympathetic to your campaign against uwe boll. getting him to quit directing will do ABSOLUTELY NO GOOD, and if you honestly feel otherwise, then it's clear that you are remarkably uneducated on the subject of film.
ps: i feel sorry for people who cannot sit around and watch an uwe boll film with friends and have their own version of mst3000. like i said, we're lucky to have our own ed wood