it's funny that videogame fans would really be angry at him not for negatively affecting the film industry, but for giving videogame movies a bad name, and making their FAVE GAMES look terrible. i've always thought that he gave videogame movies exactly the type of name they should get, and didn't really do it much worse than anyone else who remained faithful to the games would. the large majority of the games he makes movies out of are equally as bad as his movies, and i think it pretty telling of the disparity between the standards of the two industries that while this is considered acceptable and even EXCELLENT within the confines of the gaming industry, once it crosses over into the film industry, it immediately becomes so far beyond terrible that no one even takes it seriously, and in fact no one's even sure if it's a joke or not.
bloodrayne and postal fans should probably accept that if a director is gearing up to make a movie out of a game as bad as fucking BLOODRAYNE AND POSTAL, he doesn't really have any responsibility to make some sort of cinematic masterpiece out of them. realistically, there's only so much you can do with material that bad, and his movies are usually fairly realistic interpretations. i actually sort of think it's valuable in that, aside from just being funny to watch, his movies are little beacons of truth to people who don't play games, saying that contrary to what stupid videogame fans tell you, yes, many many games are actually this dumb.