no stupid i mean why is it the color red.  the moon isn't red.  did he haul MILLIONS OF GALLONS OF PAINT up to the moon?

Hancock put the symbol for the other guys earth saving thingy on the moon which was a red heart.

And no need to get your panties in a bunch.

kfadjfkdajl why are you doing this

how is it red?  yes i get that it is the organization's symbol because it's shown about 50 times throughout the movie, but how is it red ON THE MOON?

kfadjfkdajl why are you doing this

how is it red?  yes i get that it is the organization's symbol because it's shown about 50 times throughout the movie, but how is it red ON THE MOON?

You mean how did he get it red...  I guess he painted it.

will smith acted exactly like will smith what the hell are you talking about

call me an asshole one more tme.........


DO I HAVE PERMISSION TO TOUCH YOUR BODY???

it chafes a little lol...


yeah man it was a regular schindler's list

Yeah, I'm with Lamb, Hancock wasn't really an intentionally funny guy. Most of the time I was laughing at how out of tune he was with the rest of the world.

first of all, god(s) just MAKING SUPERHEROES IN PAIRS is honestly kind of a dumb premise!  especially if the only point is so they find each other and grow old as mortals.  did anyone really think this was good???  also if they get near each other then grow old and die, why is it they were together in 4 bc for him to save her from whoever, and then together again in 1850 for him to save her again, and then AGAIN in 1920?  shouldn't they have died sometime around the FIRST CENTURY?  why are the still immortal if they were together in 4 bc, 1850, and 1920?  i guess you could explain it by them intentionally parting ways so they wouldn't die but that's the point; it's poorly explained.  they just say shit and don't go into any further detail when they should, and it comes off pretty nonsensically.

also, for being lovers throughout the past 2,000 years, why does she treat him like shit and pretend she doesn't know him?  i sort of thought this was kind of lacking in realism as considering their past, i don't think think that's how she would've handled the situation (heh if my husband finds out about me YOUR DEAD BUCKO).

and at the end why is the moon red?  what did he do to it?

I never understood that either. So since they're separate, that means she'll eventually outlive her husband (and his child, etc), but everyone seems to be okay with this. It would be total torture to see your husband old and dying while you still look young and beautiful. And what if she decides to have a kid of her own?

I don't think they should've made her a hero. If they absolutely needed someone else with powers, they should've made her a villain.

I saw this tonight and didn't really like it. The whole plot turn pretty much blew.

I really liked it.  Far different than I expected (when I saw the trailers I was thinking like a pretty much straight up superhero comedy, but it was a lot darker at some points than I expected).  I loved Smith's character, how he wasn't a typical save-the-world hero.

I agree, the twist was kind of dumb, but I don't think it bogged down the movie too much.

It was certainly enjoyable, and that's really the only thing I could ask for.  Plus, Jason Bateman is hilarious.



EDIT:

it really reminded me of the tone and plot shift in click

I thought the exact same thing while I was watching it.  I thought it was handled a bit better than Click, however.

I thought the movie tried to take itself too seriously after the plot twist. If they just kept it funny it probably would've been more watchable. The ending also seemed kinda rushed and the relationship between Hancock and Mary (that's what her name was, right?) was just hard to follow.

I actually enjoyed the fact that there was no main villain in the movie, it allowed you to focus on Hancock in particular a little more. The little bit of cheesiness that worked its way in near the second half of the film didn't before me all that much, if at all. It was a really enjoyable movie, and it was great to see a sort of superhero movie that didn't spend the most part of the film explaining how all the powers came about, didn't spend ages thronging obvious facts at you to 'try' and give depth to the character and didn't stress some sort of responsibility meaning till I wanted to scream.

I was quite smitten with Hancock character, he spoke for himself, they didn't much the whole badass loner thing to far, and when it came for him to turn the other cheek, they didn't push the he's a nice Guy thing to far.

The only thing I would have like was a little more insight into the species that Hancock and the PR's wife were, so long as it was absent of the long boring descriptions. It seemed the whole 'we're a pair of some species that has powers' was repeated a few times throughout some scenes, three times if I remember correct. Once would have sufficed and a little more depth into the characters and there species would been great.

I wouldn't have minded if we got a little bit of seriousness at the end, the death of the PR or his wife would've worked for me.

That said, Hancock was a good character none the less. Nice movie.

There's talk of a second Hancock considering the amount of cash this brought in. If it goes ahead (rumours are it's already shooting, but I doubt it) then the questions we all wished had been answered that would've added depth to the movie and acting should be coming forth.