uhhhhh you can't ripoff a movie that the director allows you to remake. you know that so many more people will know about rec now that quarantine has come out right?

if you're going to argue that subtitled movies do well in either the states or abroad lol. it was a good decision to remake it rather than convince people to watch the original. that way fans will see the original where they might have skipped it before because I can't think of a single major motion picture release that was also subtitled.

also if there's a problem with the movie it's that the commercial and the fucking MOVIE POSTER spoil the ending that was so chilling in the original.

lol, saw this stoned. scared the bajeebers out of me.

This movie rocked. I loved it. I was actually pretty impressed. It's pretty suspenseful, though completely predictable. That's pretty much all I have to say, I had a great time watching this movie.

seen rec and it was entertaining, but very flawed. Can't say I willl watch this if it's just the same shit

REC was kinda scary, especially in the beginning and the last scene... I wanna see this remake for the sake of knowing if they did it better or worse.

I never saw it in theaters, I assumed they dubbed it. my mistake!

pan's labyrinth is mad overrated Fuck Pan's Labyrinth

God, yes.

i can't remember what i thought of pan's labyrinth but uhhh yip this is a remake so it can't be a ripoff. the whole idea is to reproduce the original in a more marketable way so you can't really say that at all! i mean i think it's a shitty idea and why would anybody want to make a movie that has already been made (hollywood...makem me sick) but there's also the upside that it will alert a lot more people to the original film which is a pretty cool film so why not who cares it's a movie they're all just stupid entertainers. your post is pretty hilarious, bud! an insult to the spanish?

i'm not gonna see this though i'm not defending it or anything i'm just saying it's a giant who gives a flop with possible positive side effects like "that was shit let's see the original".

i can't remember what i thought of pan's labyrinth but uhhh yip this is a remake so it can't be a ripoff. the whole idea is to reproduce the original in a more marketable way so you can't really say that at all! i mean i think it's a shitty idea and why would anybody want to make a movie that has already been made (hollywood...makem me sick) but there's also the upside that it will alert a lot more people to the original film which is a pretty cool film so why not who cares it's a movie they're all just stupid entertainers. your post is pretty hilarious, bud! an insult to the spanish?

the only reason i can think to do a remake of a movie is if it's really old or really poorly done, but the concept is fantastic

like, if you take some old black and white film and essentially update it, but still keep the same vibe and feel and...EVERYTHING


the other one is if the idea behind the movie was great but the movie itself was REALLY BAD and someone doesn't want the idea to go to waste




the problem is pretty much no remakes fall into either of these categories, but what i am saying is that there ARE good reasons to make a remake, just no one does it

uh velfarre i believe those are called "reimaginings" please get your faqs straight

actually now that THE DUDE is agreeing with me i think i might need to reevaluate my opinion

goddam. also i agree with your posts #1 and #2. too much stupid ITS A WAR ITS A CHILD IMAGININ WAR.

I can't think of a single major motion picture release that was also subtitled.

The Passion of the.. nevermind lol

(or like tom yuung gul or whatever it was originally)

Tom Yum Goong

Yeah the Protector was a complete American rehash so..............