Movies Last movie you watched? (Read 104067 times)

  • Avatar of Vellfire
  • TV people want to leave
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Premium Member
  • Joined: Feb 13, 2004
  • Posts: 9602
If you keep pressin me I will be though. You can get angry and yell about this stuff to ignorant people.

You are being incredibly ignorant about trans people but there's not really anything else I can say to you about it.  I mean you flat out deny their gender identity which is like the FOUNDATION of being trans.  Saying "you can do what you want but I don't agree with it" is the same as telling a gay person "you can do what you want in your bedroom but I don't like it!!!"  Sorry dude.
I love this hobby - stealing your mother's diary
BRRING! BRRING!
Hello!  It's me, Vellfire!  FOLLOW ME ON TWITTER! ... Bye!  CLICK!  @gidgetnomates
  • Avatar of dada
  • VILLAIN
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Administrator
  • Joined: Dec 27, 2002
  • Posts: 5538
He's right, I directly reference sex with gender but I think with trans people it is different. I think men and women are directly effected by their genitalia which controls hormone levels and to a point psychological response and behavior. All people have both estrogen and testosterone in their bodies that effects everything they think or do. Yes the brain is a powerful thing and maybe you can direct yourself to a point but I think that even then there are certain things the human mind alone cannot overcome. I think gay and trans people are still effected like this but because of a different chemical balance in the brain, one is more prominant than the other. I know that trans people think differently and this isn't a decision its the way they're born but if a trans person has a working penis and identifies with a female then the reason for that from my maybe flawed understanding is that biologically their minds are movin one way while their bodies another but one has to be dominant.
Yes, the key words there being "think". I don't expect you to be a biologist, or even to have a basic understanding of the biological processes that guide human behavior, but let me ask you first and foremost why you are even engaging in this discussion at all. Why do we even have to go to the biological aspect of the equation? This might be very interesting at a seminar, but pardon me if I'm not thrilled by the idea that we must include the aspect of biology as a variable in whether we condone the phenomenon of transsexuality. That, to me, comes very dangerously close to Social Darwinism.

Having added that caveat, we can comment on the points you raised. While it's true that human behavior is guided by our hormones, it is only one relatively weak factor in an incredibly complex system. In the womb, a child is exposed to a hormonal makeup that does not differ based on its sex. Differences in the exact circumstances of the womb (which varies per mother) have been linked to differences in personality (although proof is not up to scientific rigor yet, it seems to point in that direction) and post-birth gender roles account for a good deal of the equation. You certainly must have met a tomboy (a girl who "acts like a boy") in your life at some point—people simply vary a great deal in how they are.

The gender roles are very important in forming what is called male or female behavior. But you have to understand that there is simply no evidence (that I know of) for what you're saying—that the  inherent difference between the sexes is the chief factor in human behavior, and that this makes the plight of trans people bogus. You're not even taking note of the fact trans people take hormonal supplements as instructed by their doctors.

But I really must go back to my initial point, which is the most important. All of this is really transphobic. One of the reasons for why trans people commit suicide is because people simply don't believe their need to change is real. Most people think they're crazy, or that they're lying, or that their decision is wrong or futile. And somehow, for reasons I can't comprehend, there are laypeople, like you, who suddenly find it necessary to start talking about how complex biological systems pertain to human behavior. I'm not a biologist either, but you have a duty to inform yourself on what the prevailing scientific beliefs are if you're going to make these statements.
  • Avatar of dada
  • VILLAIN
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Administrator
  • Joined: Dec 27, 2002
  • Posts: 5538
Yeah I'm gonna agree to disagree and stop at this point after bein called phobic.
You should take this as a sign that maybe you should be more rigorous in questioning your actions. I didn't even see Vellfire's post when I wrote my reply but I said the exact same thing. I actually think that, in and of itself, it's transphobic to say "let's sit down and have a talk about whether trans people are for real or just a bunch of baloney".
  • Avatar of mkkmypet
  • Fuzzball of Doom!!!11one
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Premium Member
  • Joined: May 5, 2003
  • Posts: 1204
oh jeez what is this. Mope you are saying some pretty crazy stuff!! i haven't read all of the recent posts in this topic (something about james bond???) but just from your last posts, i can definitely see a lot distaste for transgender people (which one might rightfully call transphobia). you stated yourself that you "don't personally know any trans"-- which, by the way, is an offensive way of saying that, since trans is an adjective, not a noun that describes the entirety of a person's being-- and i think that's what the problem here is. you're acknowledging that you don't know anything about transgender stuff, and then going on to talk about that stuff anyway. it's pure ignorance. even the way you speak of trans people is very "other-ing", seeming to refer to the spectrum of people as some sort of homogenous group. you don't seem to even know what a trans person is, since you seem to think that drag queens or crossdressers are trans...? actually, i'm not even sure WHAT you think...

personal story: i'm a transgender person. specifically, i identify as genderqueer... and even more specifically, as pangender-- but let's not get too bogged down in terminology here, when it seems like you don't yet understand even the term "transgender". when i was a kid i was always a "tomboy", to the point where i liked to tell people i actually was a boy, because that was how i felt, and expressing myself outwardly as a boy made me feel comfortable and good about myself. but then i got made fun of a lot in school for wearing boy clothes and acting so masculine, so i feminized myself over several years, and i realized that i felt good and comfortable that way, too. in my early teen years i began to get involved in the LGBT community locally and online, and i came to accept myself over the course of several years as pansexual and genderqueer, and those are identities i have now been totally comfortable with for quite a while. i feel like both a man and a woman and everything in between! though physically, i feel like i should have been born male... for example, ever since i started developing breasts, they have felt weird and wrong. i'm sure i would be much happier with my body if i had a more male-contoured chest. "dysphoria" is the term for the unpleasant feeling that arises from a conflict in what my body is and what it feels like it SHOULD be. so yeah... i'm a trans person. it's just one aspect of who i am. so, you HAVE come in contact with trans people-- though i guess you didn't know it, because they (we) didn't fit your stereotypical expectations.

my girlfriend is also trans. she was born male, but never felt comfortable in her own body. in the past couple years, she's come to identify as a transgender woman. she's gotten laser hair removal on her face, and she'll be starting hormones in about a month. she's not "out" to everyone in her life yet, and to many people she comes across currently, she is perceived as a "normal dude" (albeit with cute purple hair and sailor moon t-shirts). someday she wants to get sex reassignment surgery and be able to pass as female in everyday life. but regardless of what her genitals are or what hormones are active in her body or how she dresses, she is a woman just as much as any other. unfortunately, she deals with dysphoria and transmisogyny every single day... she hates her body, she hates being referred to as "he", she hates not being able to comfortably use the women's restrooms in public places, etc... being a trans woman is tough.

anyway Mope here is what it comes down to: you could spend a long time arguing about The Truth Behind Transsexuality... there's plenty of stuff to be said about hormones and chromosomes and in-utero development. you can try to argue scientifically about why transgender is or isn't real-- though, you will find that the biological and psychological communities are hugely supportive of the transgender condition. but what REALLY matters is this: transgender people are human beings just like you. if you don't acknowledge their feelings, their struggles, their identities, then regardless of whatever ~scientific evidence~ you feel supports your behavior, you are showing a huge lack of empathy for REAL PEOPLE. why would it bother you so much to simply indulge in using others' preferred pronouns, if you know it makes them happy? why not support people's decisions to wear what they feel comfortable in? why not try to understand what someone means when they say they are "neutrois" or "agender" or "genderqueer", rather than assuming that their labels-- parts of their IDENTITIES-- are nonsense? transgender issues are SOCIAL issues, not just biological. you have the power to help a lot of people simply by acknowledging the legitimacy of who and what they say they are. and if you're going to let some sort of pseudoscientific hangups stop you from being a genuine and sympathetic human being, then you will always be a problem in the lives of trans people like me and my girlfriend.
semper games.
  • Avatar of Warped655
  • Scanner
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Member
  • Joined: Mar 25, 2004
  • Posts: 2416
I don't think that was his point is though. (that is, about whether a trans has the right to be their preferred sex or not.)

He's bringing up the semantic/scientific issue of whether or not they are in fact their preferred gender. More semantic then an ethics question on what you define the various words related to gender and sex mean.

Like, something tells me if we had a man that wanted to be a woman (or vice versa) and we had the technology to literally turn him entirely into a woman I doubt mope would object on any semantic or moral grounds (though I doubt there ever was any morally contested grounds in the first place) the the trans person would be in fact their preferred gender at that point. As it stands however, we can't do that unfortunately. So I think he sees it that these unfortunates can't be what they want to be by just saying that they are. Though they could argue that they were mentally their preferred gender.

(though yeah he did bunch trans-gender with transvestites, though I doubt he has any qualms with either)

also the technology cheerleader in me: I would not be the slightest bit surprised if such technology comes to fruition at some point in our lifetimes.

I'll level with dada and vel though: The idea that a bunch of people are killing themselves over this is pretty god damn awful. I suppose the issue you guys are most concerned with is whether they should be referred to as female or male in a social environment. I doubt you give a fuck about semantics or the rigorous scientific definitions. I think its probably advisable to just call them by their chosen gender. Because telling them/reminding them of the cold-hearted truth isn't likely to help them out psychologically. You have to sacrifice semantics for these individual's happiness. Something most people should probably do, but wont because they either don't care about the lives of these people or because they don't think they are morally responsible for the mental well being and potential suicides of trans when they say call them by their 'birth gender'. Basically, I guess you could say they are like Rorschach from the Watchmen (who is basically a psychopath), they would trade the world's well being for the truth or some sort of principle of accuracy.

Like, if someone desperately wanted to be something, and it just was not possible for this to be true, but you could at least comfort them by telling them that they are what they desire to be that they wont go jumping off a skyscraper because they feel they they came out wrong.

A problem though, that this will only help some. The fact that many would not be able to be comforted. That they don't just want to be told they are what they want to be but to actually be what they want to be.


I think this is a very complex issue.
  • Avatar of tuxedo marx
  • Fuckin' A.
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Premium Member
  • Joined: Oct 21, 2005
  • Posts: 4143
i can definitely see a lot distaste for transgender people (which one might rightfully call transphobia)
i don't have a lot to add to that post since i'm not a transperson myself but i'm just gonna paraphrase someone i saw on twitter today - that this is simply transphobia by definition
  • Avatar of Vellfire
  • TV people want to leave
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Premium Member
  • Joined: Feb 13, 2004
  • Posts: 9602
I'm sure mkk or someone could clarify a lot better than me but you seem to have a very simplistic or skewed or outdated or whatever idea of gender.  Your whole post frames trans people as WANTING to be a certain gender.  It's not like that.  They are that gender.  It's not about just humoring trans people by calling them the pronouns they want (that's bare minimum decency-wise).  I don't just call trans women "she" because it's what they want, it's because they literally are women.  I guess the best way to clear this up is for you to tell me exactly what you believe makes someone a woman or a man and discuss it from there.
I love this hobby - stealing your mother's diary
BRRING! BRRING!
Hello!  It's me, Vellfire!  FOLLOW ME ON TWITTER! ... Bye!  CLICK!  @gidgetnomates
  • Avatar of dada
  • VILLAIN
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Administrator
  • Joined: Dec 27, 2002
  • Posts: 5538
I don't think that was his point is though. (that is, about whether a trans has the right to be their preferred sex or not.)
I don't know who you're responding to. Certainly not to me, because I did not argue that Mope is saying anything about rights. What I'm saying is you cannot say "let's see if we can use spurious layperson science to disprove the plight of trans people". That, to me, is unequivocal transphobia. The fact that the biological and psychological consensuses can vouch for the genuineness of their condition is only an aside to that.
  • Avatar of dada
  • VILLAIN
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Administrator
  • Joined: Dec 27, 2002
  • Posts: 5538
and now  back to discussing some FAR MORE IMPORTANT MATTERS i last watched Jürgen Knieper - Der Amerikanische Freund it was good
  • Avatar of Warped655
  • Scanner
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Member
  • Joined: Mar 25, 2004
  • Posts: 2416
No Dada, I wasn't  specifically responding to you with that line. Or anyone in particular. Though using the word 'Phobic' indicates some sort of indignation or disgust and I don't think Mope possesses these for trans-gender people.

I'm sure mkk or someone could clarify a lot better than me but you seem to have a very simplistic or skewed or outdated or whatever idea of gender.  Your whole post frames trans people as WANTING to be a certain gender.  It's not like that.  They are that gender.  It's not about just humoring trans people by calling them the pronouns they want (that's bare minimum decency-wise).  I don't just call trans women "she" because it's what they want, it's because they literally are women.  I guess the best way to clear this up is for you to tell me exactly what you believe makes someone a woman or a man and discuss it from there.
OK, before I do that, are we assuming different definitions for the words 'gender' and 'sex'? Or are we talking about them as synonymous? I vaguely remember having a similar discussion where they were pointed out as different.

I don't care for personal definitions. If you are going to talk definitions you look at a dictionary. Dictionary.com will suffice:
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/man
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/woman
Which leads you to these definitions: (if you follow along)

fe·male
noun
1.
a person bearing two X chromosomes in the cell nuclei and normally having a vagina, a uterus and ovaries, and developing at puberty a relatively rounded body and enlarged breasts, and retaining a beardless face; a girl or woman.
2.
an organism of the sex or sexual phase that normally produces egg cells.

male
1.
a person bearing an X and Y chromosome pair in the cell nuclei and normally having a penis, scrotum, and testicles, and developing hair on the face at adolescence; a boy or man.
2.
an organism of the sex or sexual phase that normally produces a sperm cell or male gamete.


AGAIN, I acknowledge that these are not socially oriented. but you are now trying to say that the actual scientific (or if you will, standard) definition is different than it is. This is silly. Though probably not authentically important to your cause anyway.
  • Avatar of mkkmypet
  • Fuzzball of Doom!!!11one
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Premium Member
  • Joined: May 5, 2003
  • Posts: 1204
yeah, warped, your post seems very well-intentioned, but your ideas of gender are pretty offensive... let me make this clear: gender identity is an individual's internal sense of whether they are a man or a woman or genderqueer (or whatever). sex is the biological status of an organism being male or female or intersex (or whatever). sex and gender are both spectrums, not binary. sex and gender are unrelated in that they do not have to be linked in any way, although it is more common for individuals to be cisgender (matching gender and sex) than transgender (mismatching gender and sex).

Vellfire is right in saying that trans people do not just WANT to be a certain gender-- they just ARE. saying someone "wants to be a gender" is pretty nonsensical to begin with when you just consider what the definition of gender identity is. i guess you could say that a trans person may WANT to be a certain sex, though-- which is achieved, at least partially, through hormone treatments and surgery. however, this is not a key part of what transgender necessarily IS, as there are a lot of trans people who have no desire to use hormones or surgery to change their bodies.

for example: up until this past spring, i had long hair, always-shaved legs, daily makeup, and feminine clothing. nobody would've ever referred to me as anything other than a normal girl. however, that doesn't change what i WAS-- what i AM. i'm genderqueer. i'm as much of a man as you, and as much of a woman as Vellfire. regardless of how i present myself, my gender is who i am.
semper games.
  • Avatar of Warped655
  • Scanner
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Member
  • Joined: Mar 25, 2004
  • Posts: 2416
I think there was only a misunderstanding then any actually disagreement then. Mostly my fault.
  • Avatar of Warped655
  • Scanner
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Member
  • Joined: Mar 25, 2004
  • Posts: 2416
Its it not socially acceptable to call someone utilizing a pronoun that does not fit their gender. I can get that. I don't know the actual histories of the words. The first time I heard that gender and sex meant different things was not very long ago. Though, now that I think about it I think according to the dictionary gender and sex may be synonymous. *checks* yes it is. Which makes this a bit more confusing.

Whatever, should probably stick to using the term 'gender identity' to be more specific rather than just 'gender' but that's just nitpicking.

I've ever only met two transgender people in my life. Both were pleasant women. (that is... sex=males, gender=women)

EDIT: That is, its socially unacceptable to call someone by a pronoun exclusively oriented around their sex. But I imagine honest mistakes can be made. What about 'drag queens'? are they transgender or just cisgender with... something that I don't have a word for... I suppose its a case by case basis? While I've met with one and had a short discussion about music, that is all  I talked about. I don't honestly know what the safe distinctions are.
  • Avatar of Vellfire
  • TV people want to leave
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Premium Member
  • Joined: Feb 13, 2004
  • Posts: 9602
Though, now that I think about it I think according to the dictionary gender and sex may be synonymous. *checks* yes it is. Which makes this a bit more confusing.

Dictionaries aren't the be-all end-all of everything, y'know.
I love this hobby - stealing your mother's diary
BRRING! BRRING!
Hello!  It's me, Vellfire!  FOLLOW ME ON TWITTER! ... Bye!  CLICK!  @gidgetnomates
  • Avatar of tuxedo marx
  • Fuckin' A.
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Premium Member
  • Joined: Oct 21, 2005
  • Posts: 4143
yeah it's kind of a signifier of the lack of recognition transpeople have more than anything else
  • Avatar of mkkmypet
  • Fuzzball of Doom!!!11one
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Premium Member
  • Joined: May 5, 2003
  • Posts: 1204
warped: you should be aware that sex is not binary. XX and XY chromosomes are not all there is-- there is XO, XXY, XXXY, and more. just like people with typical XX or XY chromosomes, people with those other conditions can be any gender, because it is not linked to sex. and anyway, X and Y chromosomes are a strictly human way of categorizing sex. even in terms of external manifestation of sex, there is a huge range among genitalia. intersex people are born with unusual sex characteristics-- for example, a baby with XX chromosomes being born with a penis, or a baby that has both ovaries and testes. these things happen, and it's not all too uncommon, either.

also yeah dictionaries do not exist for the purpose of defining TRUTH, they only provide general definitions that will likely match what the user is looking for. and if you check a dictionary of psychological or sociological terms, you will get very different definitions of "man" and "woman" than in a biology dictionary.
semper games.
  • Avatar of crone_lover720
  • PEW PEW PEW
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Premium Member
  • Joined: Mar 25, 2002
  • Posts: 5554
Erikson's own interest in identity began in childhood. Raised Jewish, Erikson appeared very Scandinavian, and felt that he was an outsider of both groups. His later studies of cultural life among the Yurok of northern California and the Sioux of South Dakota helped formalize Erikson's ideas about identity development and identity crisis. --a poorly written wikipidia article on identity crisis this isn't referring to transgender people

I'm sure mkk or someone could clarify a lot better than me but you seem to have a very simplistic or skewed or outdated or whatever idea of gender.  Your whole post frames trans people as WANTING to be a certain gender.  It's not like that.  They are that gender.  It's not about just humoring trans people by calling them the pronouns they want (that's bare minimum decency-wise).  I don't just call trans women "she" because it's what they want, it's because they literally are women.  I guess the best way to clear this up is for you to tell me exactly what you believe makes someone a woman or a man and discuss it from there.
this is a really tough concept for people to get and it's fairly recent. mopes idea isn't skewed, it's just "traditional" if youll let me be lazy in word choice. this stuff is just not a part of most people's lives, especially if you're working class or not part of academia. just gotta try and get em to see it this way, but they might not... personally I think the next best thing is tolerance. just leaving my mark, my two scents
  • Avatar of mkkmypet
  • Fuzzball of Doom!!!11one
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Premium Member
  • Joined: May 5, 2003
  • Posts: 1204
Its it not socially acceptable to call someone utilizing a pronoun that does not fit their gender. I can get that. I don't know the actual histories of the words. The first time I heard that gender and sex meant different things was not very long ago. Though, now that I think about it I think according to the dictionary gender and sex may be synonymous. *checks* yes it is. Which makes this a bit more confusing.

Whatever, should probably stick to using the term 'gender identity' to be more specific rather than just 'gender' but that's just nitpicking.

I've ever only met two transgender people in my life. Both were pleasant women. (that is... sex=males, gender=women)

EDIT: That is, its socially unacceptable to call someone by a pronoun exclusively oriented around their sex. But I imagine honest mistakes can be made. What about 'drag queens'? are they transgender or just cisgender with... something that I don't have a word for... I suppose its a case by case basis? While I've met with one and had a short discussion about music, that is all  I talked about. I don't honestly know what the safe distinctions are.

people generally use "gender" to mean "gender identity", yeah. but the former term can also be used to refer to the sociological perceptions of masculinity and femininity, gender roles, etc... anyway, the important distinction here is simply that gender and sex and not equivalent (even if a dictionary says so). i'm glad to see you acknowledging that, and referring to the trans people you've known by their proper terms (as "women").

as for drag queens and male crossdressers-- very simple answer: they are usually cisgender men who just enjoy playing around with gender. it is an entirely different phenomenon than transgender. in fact, many trans women (my girlfriend included) find drag queens to be quite offensive.

warped, a lot of your questions are things that some basic gender studies would answer. for the simplest way to start getting into this stuff, i suggest you just start reading at this page and explore: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gender_identity

EDIT: pro-tip! if you are unsure of someone's gender, there is usually no harm in asking them what their preferred pronouns are. i personally am delighted when someone asks, because it shows that they care about acknowledging my identity. by the way, my preferred pronouns are they/them/their ;D also, you should treat trans people just like anyone else, regardless of whether or not they fit your expectations of gender. and as long as you present yourself with a desire to understand and respect others, nobody will likely have a problem discussing trans issues with you.
semper games.
  • Avatar of Warped655
  • Scanner
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Member
  • Joined: Mar 25, 2004
  • Posts: 2416
Glad to see we are on the same page then.

I just don't like wishy-washness in definitions. It makes discussion pointless as there is no end to it.

But here you make a precise context based definitions on the words gender and sex. Its complex and understandably confusing. But there is a 'correct' and 'incorrect'. Which makes me cool with it.

Dictionaries aren't the be-all end-all of everything, y'know.
Dictionaries (and encyclopedias) are extremely important as a starting point as a general blanket for situations such as these.

I think its also important to point out, since its not exactly straight forward, I think its unfair to immediately label someone not in the know about these things as 'phobic'. And saying its offensive is arguably something understandable but it introduces the possibility of a literal unfair social minefield in other topics even outside of gender and sex issues.

This barrier to entry, I think its more destructive than useful. layman's discussions are important, especially if you want progressive ideas to spread. Mope is a layman like me, you shoo him away from the discussion by calling him out at best, alienate him at worst.

Don't get me wrong though, there is always open violent rebellion instead of this discourse to push these ideas. Or maybe just wait for the old thinkers to die of old age rather than attempt to convince them. (lol, better hope we don't come up with longevity extending medicine)
  • Avatar of crone_lover720
  • PEW PEW PEW
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Premium Member
  • Joined: Mar 25, 2002
  • Posts: 5554
as for drag queens and male crossdressers-- very simply answer: they are usually cisgender men who just enjoy playing around with gender. it is an entirely different phenomenon than transgender. in fact, many trans women (my girlfriend included) find drag queens to be quite offensive.
are you sure? I mean there's stuff like my campus's DRAG SHOW which is a bunch of completely cisgender frat boys and a few gay dudes dressing up in drag for a night in the name of Campus Diversity, and that's uh yeah, but there are also transgender people who do drag or wear different types of clothes. maybe you mean specifically the act of "guys messing around in women's clothes" which I think is generally innocent in intention but understandably offensive