I haven't thought about that, but I just dislike the fact that there is one unit to counteract units and stuff. I think it would be better left like how sc 1 was, how there's just more powerful units then the weaker units, like weak units would be early in the game and you'd get heavier shit later.

I dunno why you would say this because I just watched the new video they have on the blzzard SC2 site and they micro a lot in it and it's a WIN OR LOSE thing where if you don't do it you are at a huge disadvantage.

Also SC1 and WC3 both had a lot of weight on microing your troops and builders so why wouldn't this have? What makes you think there is no real micro in this?

It's just the new features. Like the zealot rush thing, I can't rush zealots no more, and the fact that you can select so many units, itll be harder to do things.

Some of the stuff in this video are one reason too:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s7k3ZM6bQx4&feature=related

I
Want
This
Game
Now

I am really struggling to comprehend this. You would rather they had it so the later tech units had no counter at all and were impossible to beat? Like whoever built the biggest, baddest unit first wins?

They took out a cheap tactic and now you have to actually play the game to win instead of some bullshit 2 minute wins which aren't fun for anyone. Also how can you say being able to select more units is a BAD feature? It's EASIER to do things if you're able to select more units, and it means you can do the same movements and attacks in 2 or 3 clicks instead of 20 clicks. There's practically no disadvantage at all about this unless you're playing against someone who would only ever use one group of units (like me) and consequently they're no longer as easy to steamroll.

No, because the later tech units would cost more and take longer to build. I meant it as in, instead of one unit that counteracts another unit, why not like, get powerful and more powerful units? I mean like SC1.

What's a cheap tactic? Now the zealots are the most powerful early units in the game. Not that they weren't in sc1 already, but at least you could kill them if you had range. And selecting more units is a positive and a negative. Because you have such a range on the amount of units you can select, it'll be just as easier to select units that you don't want to select, thus slowing you down.

But...but Starcraft had Rock-Paper-Scissors gameplay too?

At least, that's how I remembered it. Goliaths would beat air units, but ground units would beat them. firebats beat zerg but got beat by anything else basically. seige tanks beat everything always except for air units or the superfast zerglings. etc etc etc.

Yeah I don't know where your getting that impression. Hero units are basically just enhanced versions of other units. Each unit was distinct, if not by their stats it's by how they attacked, attack speed, skills, hell what they could attack, and their range.