brighter than creation's dark: 8.2
alegranza: 8.3
#50, Ice Cream Spiritual, 8.4
#49, alight of night: 8.1
#48, high places: 8.0
#29, stay positive, 8.4
#13, new amerykah, 7.8
why no guincho or dbt, despite having higher individual ratings than new amerykah at #13? why not give them places at #49 or 48, both of which are lower rated than both guincho or dbt? why is new amerykah even on the list? how come the list doesn't
even link the full reviews? is it because people will notice dear science recieved a 9.2 and the sungiant ep only recieved an 8.7 despite being THE BEST ALBUM OF 2008?
obviously, these were individual reviewers, and unlike so many internet nerds I don't think the one reviewer determines the entire staff opinion.
I do think however, placing a band in the best new music section, does indicate some consensus. and both DBT and El Guincho recieved that honor. the shit keeps piling up; #40, the esau album, appears on only six staffers lists. so does drive by truckers; both were best new music. so an album chosen by six staffers gets to be #40; another album doesn't even appear. #50, the pony tail album that scored above dbt, appears twice. el guincho appears three times.
what metrics are at use here? it's not the staff list by any normal numbering metric: if we apply point values of the 25th place as 1 point, 24 as 2, etc, ponytail has a total of 30 points, and dbt, which is on two staffers #2 and #1 (ponytail tops off at #3 on one list), has
76 points.
so DBT is on more staffers lists. it has more value on each list. ponytail even being #3 on one list is beaten by DBT being #2 and #1.
but no DBT. it's nowhere. it's not even on their honorable mentions list.
the carter 3 and kanye's album are on almost every list. other than flying lotus's instrumental album, I didn't see any individual staffer list another hiphop album.
so yes shep, there is something NOT GOOD when your list consists entirely of pitchfork's best of 08 list or when you're using them as a reminder, because you aren't even remembering what
pitchfork thought was the best albums of 08, let alone what you thought. the best of list isn't the best music; it's the best music they know pitchfork's audience will appreciate. there are dumb attempts of genre crossing with the bug and carter iii but it's obvious pitchfork views these like mysterious cultural artifacts to be presented to a hipster idol wearing a keffiyeh; they know they won't get criticized for putting carter iii up so high because they shaped their audience into thinking lil wayne's stuttering second grade snaps are some type of futuristic hiphop.
obviously it's a shit list. all lists are shit. but saying
the-there's... som-something wrong with th-that?
in regards to a list that doesn't even reflect the staff's own opinions? that's even more bullshit.
also unless you're going to say I WAS BEING SARCASTIC

(don't care, I've always wanted to check the metrics behind pitchfork's dumb list and now I had an excuse) please don't argue this for everyone's sake!!!