FOR EXAMPLE i listened to fucking מתן ממן which is an israeli dude who does MONGOLIAN THROAT SINGING or some shit and although i didn't particularily LOVE IT i still thought it was cool and unique and something that's possible to listen to once in a while.
why does everyone do this. its like when indie kids listen to mastodon and like metal. it's always a specific supposedly obtuse example.
also, i don't see what's so evil about pulling up a pitchfork list of 2008 albums?? okay so i like a lot of the stuff they like, is that really such a crime? and to use it to refresh my memory, i don't see how that's so awful, either. seeing as how i liked a majority of their picks and its ALL CONVENIENTLY there (i don't know any sites that list all 2008 albums) it was the quicket resource. sorry.
you're the one saying "evil" and "crime". I said it's "bad", don't pin it on me as though I said it was anything worse or even implied it. and it is bad! pitchfork is both hilariously genre limited and as I pretty succesfully demonstrated isn't even being fair to their own reviewers or audience.
I also don't know if you're being serious that you don't know any other sites that list the 2008 albums. I mean, someone mentioned Rolling Stone in here, right?
http://www.rollingstone.com/news/story/24958695/albums_of_the_year/31http://www.metacritic.com/music/bests/2008.shtmlhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:2008_albumshttp://blog.allmusic.com/2008/12/05/allmusics-favorite-albums-of-2008/I linked the last.fm one earlier and mentioned the AV Club as well.
none of those are perfect (one puts Mellencamp in the top 10) but don't even play like this man, you're ignoring the more damning point; you went to Pitchfork first to remind yourself of what YOUR favorite albums were. you didn't look in your own library for this, you went STRAIGHT TO PFORK. what the hell man? why would you ever do this? how can you say "2008 was a great year for music" and
need a reminder to what came out? that doesn't make any sense at all. do you expect anyone to believe this:
a lot of the shit i listen to got horrible reviews on pfork and guess what, i still listen to them!!
i'm not one of those I LUV ALL MUSIC EXCEPT COUNTRY AND RAP. i listened to your hip-hop mixtape and i liked it. i really don't know how to justify OPEN-MINDED to you?? unless i list all my OBSCURE WEIRD ARTISTS and only then may i get Steel's Stamp of Approval.
when you couldn't remember a single artist that wasn't on Pitchfork's list? no one's asking for obscure, but there's a reason people keep saying "listened to the stuff in FP's list, man it's just the same indie shit we've been hearing for years", and it's not because they want my Stamp of Approval (if anything I'd get the feeling a GW member would take great glee in spearing me on some obscure musical point as I am probably the biggest nerd on this forum). it's because it is kind of boring and you ain't fooling anyone by claiming openmindedness.
being open minded has more to do with being readily available to listen to any kind of music more than actually liking music outside your safe genre.
Liking a broad array of genres, that's having a wide taste.
this is true and a good distinction but I also would find it suspect if someone said they were openminded and then proceeded to list like 12 albums all clearly designed for one type of person. even pfork threw some dumb DJ/rupture or something no one heard of so they didn't get this claim. the validity of an open mind is that you can also close it to awful concepts, but I find it hard to believe someone with an open mind would only have a single genre, or hell TYPE OF SOUND of music in their list.
And yeah 2007 is pretty much my favorite year in music.
is this a fake post.
I mean maybe I'm being dumb but as panda said look at 1977 dude there's no way Person Pitch or Sound of Silver can compete with Low or Exodus.