Apparently there is going to be a sequel to Donnie Darko.
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1231277/The movie follows Samantha, Donnie's little sister. I'd post the trailer, but all it shows are clips from the first movie and it's not really worth watching.
S. Darko takes place in the summer of 1995, seven years after the original film. It follows Donnie Darko's younger sister, Samantha (Daveigh Chase), who, in the wake of his death, has found herself at age 17 with a broken family, mired in feelings of insignificance. She and her best friend Corey (Evigan) set off on a road trip to Hollywood in a bid to 'make it big', but their journey is cut short when their car breaks down unexpectedly, leaving them stranded in a small desert town. When a meteorite happens to crash-land nearby, Samantha is plagued by bizarre visions telling of the universe's end and it appears that their breakdown was part of some grander plan. When she finds out she was actually adopted by the Darkos, and that she is in no way related to Donnie, she must face her own demons and, in doing so, save the world and herself.
Source:
http://io9.com/5145837/donnie-darko-sequel-will-see-the-light-of-dayIt's going to be a direct-to-DVD release, so it's not sounding very promising.
I'm kind of surprised there would be a sequel to Donnie Darko. I loved the movie when I saw it the first few times, but that was when I was 17. The last time I watched it was about a month ago and it was... dumb. It's really an incoherent mess of a movie, and it's no wonder Southland Tales was so awful.
Is Richard Kelly doomed to never have a wide theater release of his movies?