tbh marmot i'd never even heard the term until you started throwing it around like you tend to do with most things. im fond of the part where you say i didnt specify what i meant by assigning numbers to happiness when you wont shut up about it and i've only said that i don't think that's an appropriate assessment of what i'm saying. i don't know what utilitarianism is; i don't even care! despite you and ninjapirate's concerns about B....BUT WHAT IF A BABY NEEDS TO BE RAPED etc etc, i think this is an alright and minimally arbitrary (it's still arbitrary in that ya its my opinion that he probably shouldnt go hungry and there are no SPECIFIC NUMBERS that weigh into things but again, since this was initially comparing two methods of reaching a decision, degrees apply) way to figure out if you should be doing something that might be questionable. at least until you turn into a gigantic faggot and start wondering whether maybe........the homeless guy deserves to be hungry. go talk shit about how women shouldn't do science or something
i mean if you got a better way lets hear it brah but sorry climbtree im gonna keep doing this instead of just doing what the bible told me, thanks for the suggestion though
Last Edit: May 01, 2009, 07:05:01 am by headphonics