nobody is arguing that rpgmaker shit is dead mori we are arguing that gw doesn't have to just stagnate just because rpgmaker is dead, it doesn't even matter what gw is NOW it could be something totally different next month so you saying ACCEPT IT IT'S DEAD IT DIED WITH RPGMAKER doesn't mean shit
You're right, GW doesn't have to stagnate at all if it's becoming something else. And if it is, hey, good for it. It's not like I'm saying this site's doomed to death or something. The topic's called 'Why did this site die?', all I did was answer the very specific question that was asked. I wasn't even the first to answer it in the topic, but for some reason I'm getting a firestorm over it.
By all means GW can keep going on, and can become something else, perhaps something even bigger and better than before. But Gaming World, the site in its current state and as it has always been (Since that's what, you know, we are TALKING ABOUT, not the GW that it is apparently going to be that you all keep alluding to), has died for the simple reason I have gotten at.
It's like everyone's ignoring what the topic's even about. The dude asked why GW, AS IT IS AND WAS not as it magically WILL BE, died.
Why that OFFENDS you guys I have no fucking clue. Mateui and UPRC said the exact same things, decline of gamemaking and aging members yet nobody seems to have an issue.
p.s. gw 4 life and thx for the bday wish atari