really

i thought it meant what is pizza

That doesn't make any sense.

If you don't already know what a pizza is, then how do you know to shorten the phrase down to three letters? Even knowing that wip means "what is pizza" implies you already know what pizza is, meaning you never even had to use that phrase in the first place! It's a question you never have to ask again after getting the answer, making the whole idea of needing to shorten how you ask that particular question an entirely moot point.

wip is obviously supposed to mean when is pizza. That's a question everyone asks often enough that you pretty much have to shorten it to three letters. Or else the pizza is already going to be there before you even finish asking the question.

That doesn't make any sense.

If you don't already know what a pizza is, then how do you know to shorten the phrase down to three letters? Even knowing that wip means "what is pizza" implies you already know what pizza is, meaning you never even had to use that phrase in the first place! It's a question you never have to ask again after getting the answer, making the whole idea of needing to shorten how you ask that particular question an entirely moot point.

This isn't true at all.  It just means you know the WORD pizza.  It doesn't mean you know what the word means.  You could still validly ask that question and know the word.  Your logic is faulty as usual, sir.

the phrase has its origins in the now-famous season of jeopardy where "italian food" was introduced as a recurring category

This isn't true at all.  It just means you know the WORD pizza.  It doesn't mean you know what the word means.  You could still validly ask that question and know the word.  Your logic is faulty as usual, sir.

They would still only need to ask the question once. I wasn't pointing out that the question itself was invalid to ask, I was pointing out that universally shortening that particular question to "wip" would be pointless for a question you only ever need to ask once in your own lifetime.

Don't try to call someone on faulty logic unless you can accept that you also risk applying it yourself.

They would still only need to ask the question once. I wasn't pointing out that the question itself was invalid to ask, I was pointing out that universally shortening that particular question to "wip" would be pointless for a question you only ever need to ask once in your own lifetime.

Don't try to call someone on faulty logic unless you can accept that you also risk applying it yourself.

Is the question "what is the meaning of life?" the sort you only ask once?  Of course not.  There are some people who ask this question hundreds or thousands of times over their lifetime.  "What is pizza?" is also one of those questions.  Obviously you are simply trying to attack me rather than think your own arguments through, sir.

today, pizza is the kitchen in which vellfire gives edc another black eye. on the surface, the cheese is unperturbed. but underneath, the capsicum and tomato paste run red. the ham is shred and scattered. the question today is not "What is pizza?" It is "What has pizza BECOME?"

I still am really sure you attacked me first vell (and I still think we are trying to argue two different things here, just for the sake of each of our own egos), but I am also willing to accept the compromise Biggles has proposed, because he raises an excellent point.

Pizza was never ever meant to be discussed in this manner. Pizza is meant to know only good experiences. I think anyone can agree to that much. (Unless they aren't currently aware of what pizza is.)

What are you dweebs arguing about? get dweebier jk you couldn't possibly.

If you turkeys are done, make way cause ~REAL-ASS DUDES~ got to get their screenshot on



I've been making platformer tilesets for the past couple of weeks and compiled them all into a bunch of mockups to see how they'd look when I import them into my game. The houses aren't done; it's taking me a while to FIGURE OUT HOUSES because I can't find a lot of 2D games with houses in a head-on perspective to use as reference.